Subjective reports of confidence are frequently used as a measure of awareness in a variety of fields, including artificial grammar learning. However, little is known about what information is used to make confidence judgments and whether there are any possible sources of information used to discriminate between items that are unrelated to confidence. The data reported here replicate an earlier experiment by Vokey and Brooks (1992) and show that grammaticality decisions are based on both the grammatical status of items and their similarity to study exemplars. The key finding is that confidence ratings made on a continuous scale (50%—100%) are closely related to grammaticality but are unrelated to all of the measures of similarity that were tested. By contrast, confidence ratings made on a binary scale (high vs. low) are related to both grammaticality and similarity. The data confirm an earlier finding (Tunney & Shanks, 2003) that binary confidence ratings are more sensitive to low levels of awareness than continuous ratings are and suggest that participants are conscious of all the information acquired in artificial grammar learning.
Chan, C. (1992).Implicit cognitive processes: Theoretical issues and applications in computer systems design. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Oxford.
Cheesman, J., &Merikle, P. M. (1984). Priming with and without awareness.Perception & Psychophysics,36, 387–395.
Dienes, Z. (1992). Connectionist and memory-array models of artificial grammar learning.Cognitive Science,16, 41–79.
Dienes, Z., &Altmann, G. T. M. (1997). Transfer of implicit knowledge across domains: How implicit and how abstract? In D. C. Berry (Ed.),How implicit is implicit learning? (pp. 107–123). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dienes, Z., Altmann, G. T. M., Kwan, L., &Goode, A. (1995). Unconscious knowledge of artificial grammars is applied strategically.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 1322–1338.
Dienes, Z., &Berry, D. (1997). Implicit learning: Below the subjective threshold.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,4, 3–23.
Dulany, D. E., Carlson, R. A., &Dewey, G. I. (1984). A case of syntactical learning and judgment: How conscious and how abstract?Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,113, 541–555.
Eriksen, C. W. (1960). Discrimination and learning without awareness: A methodological survey and evaluation.Psychological Review,67, 279–300.
Higham, P. A. (1997a). Chunks are not enough: The insufficiency of feature frequency-based explanations of artificial grammar learning.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology,51, 126–137.
Higham, P. A. (1997b). Dissociations of grammaticality and specific similarity effects in artificial grammar learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 1029–1045.
Higham, P. A., Vokey, J. R., &Pritchard, J. L. (2000). Beyond dissociation logic: Evidence for controlled and automatic processing in artificial grammar learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,129, 457–470.
Johnstone, T., &Shanks, D. R. (1999). Two mechanisms in implicit artificial grammar learning? Comment on Meulemans and Van der Linden (1997).Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,25, 524–531.
Johnstone, T., &Shanks, D. R. (2001). Abstractionist and processing accounts of implicit learning.Cognitive Psychology,42, 61–112.
Kinder, A., &Shanks, D. R. S. (2001). Amnesia and the declarative/ nondeclarative distinction: A recurrent network model of classification, recognition, and repetition priming.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,13, 648–669.
Knowlton, B. J., Ramus, S. J., &Squire, L. R. (1992). Intact artificial grammar learning in amnesia: Dissociation of classification learning and explicit memory for specific instances.Psychological Science,3, 172–179.
Knowlton, B. J., &Squire, L. R. (1994). The information acquired during artificial grammar learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 79–91.
Kunimoto, C., Miller, J., &Pashler, H. (2001). Confidence and accuracy of near-threshold discrimination responses.Consciousness & Cognition,10, 294–340.
McAndrews, M. P., &Moscovitch, M. (1985). Rule-based and exemplar-based classification in artificial grammar learning.Memory & Cognition,13, 469–475.
Meulemans, T., &Van der Linden, M. (1997). Associative chunk strength in artificial grammar learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 1007–1028.
Peirce, C. S., &Jastrow, J. (1884). On small differences of sensation.Memoirs of the National Academy of Sciences,3, 75–83.
Perruchet, P. (1994). Defining the knowledge units of a synthetic language: Comment on Vokey and Brooks (1992).Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 223–228.
Perruchet, P., &Pacteau, C. (1990). Synthetic grammar learning: Implicit rule abstraction or explicit fragmentary knowledge?Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,119, 264–275.
Pothos, E. M., &Bailey, T. M. (2000). The role of similarity in artificial grammar learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 847–862.
Reber, A. S. (1967). Implicit learning of artificial grammars.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,6, 855–863.
Shanks, D. R., & St.John, M. F. (1994). Characteristics of dissociable human learning systems.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,17, 367–447.
Tunney, R. J., &Altmann, G. T. M. (1999). The transfer effect in artificial grammar learning: Reappraising the evidence on the transfer of sequential dependencies.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,25, 1322–1333.
Tunney, R. J., &Shanks, D. R. (2003). Subjective measures of awareness and implicit cognition.Memory & Cognition,31, 1060–1071.
Vokey, J. R., &Brooks, L. R. (1992). Salience of item knowledge in learning artificial grammars.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 328–344.
Yonelinas, A. P. (1997). Recognition memory ROCs for item and associative information: The contribution of recollection and familiarity.Memory & Cognition,25, 747–763.
About this article
Cite this article
Tunney, R.J. Sources of confidence judgments in implicit cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 12, 367–373 (2005). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196386