Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us
Search
Cart
  1. Home
  2. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  3. Article
Backward associative strength determines source attributions given to false memories
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Brief Reports
  • Published: December 2002

Backward associative strength determines source attributions given to false memories

  • Jason L. Hicks2 &
  • Thomas W. Hancock1 

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review volume 9, pages 807–815 (2002)Cite this article

  • 1209 Accesses

  • 41 Citations

  • Metrics details

Abstract

Source attributions for falsely remembered material were investigated in two experiments. A male and a female speaker each presented either an entire word list or half of the items from each of multiple Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) lists commonly used in this paradigm. In the latter condition the tendency of each list half to activate a nonpresented, critical list theme item was manipulated. All of the list halves differed in backward associative strength (BAS), and each was presented by one or the other of the two speakers. In these correlated conditions, when critical items were falsely recognized (Experiments 1 and 2) or recalled (Experiment 2), source attributions were more frequently made to the speaker of the list items with the higher average BAS. This source attribution effect appears to result from the binding of list item source characteristics to activated critical items during encoding, as opposed to being the result of a biased retrieval process. The results are interpreted as consistent with an activation/monitoring account of false memory in the DRM paradigm.

Download to read the full article text

Working on a manuscript?

Avoid the common mistakes

References

  • Anisfeld, M., &Knapp, M. (1968). Association, synonymity, and directionality in false recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology,77, 171–179.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arndt, J., &Hirshman, E. (1998). True and false recognition in MINERVA2: Explanations from a global matching perspective.Journal of Memory & Language,39, 371–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bower, G. H., Black, J. B., &Turner, T. J. (1979). Scripts in memory for text.Cognitive Psychology,11, 177–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brainerd, C. J., Wright, R., Reyna, V. G., &Mojardin, A. H. (2001). Conjoint recognition and phantom recollection.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,27, 307–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deese, J. (1959). On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology,58, 17–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dodson, C. S., &Schacter, D. L. (2001). “If I had said it I would have remembered it”: Reducing false memories with a distinctiveness heuristic.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,8, 155–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallo, D. A., McDermott, K. B., Percer, J. M., &Roediger, H. L., III (2001). Modality effects in false recall and false recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,27, 339–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graesser, A. C., &Nakamura, G. V. (1982). The impact of a schema on comprehension and memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 16, pp. 59–109). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, J. L., &Marsh, R. L. (1999). Attempts to reduce the incidence of false recall with source monitoring.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,25, 1195–1209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, J. L., &Marsh, R. L. (2001). False recognition occurs more frequently during source identification than during old-new recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,27, 375–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Israel, L., &Schacter, D. L. (1997). Pictorial encoding reduces false recognition of semantic associates.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,4, 577–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. K., Foley, M. A., Suengas, A. G., &Raye, C. L. (1988). Phenomenal characteristics of memories for perceived and imagined autobiographical events.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,117, 371–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., &Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring.Psychological Bulletin,114, 3–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. K., &Raye, C. L. (1981). Reality monitoring.Psychological Review,88, 67–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. K., Raye, C. L., Foley, H. J., &Foley, M. A. (1981). Cognitive operations and decision bias in reality monitoring.American Journal of Psychology,94, 37–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lampinen, J. M., Neuschatz, J. S., &Payne, D. G. (1999). Source attributions and false memories: A test of the demand characteristics account.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,6, 130–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, R. L., &Hicks, J. L. (2001). Output monitoring tests reveal false memories of memories that never existed.Memory,9, 39–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mather, M., Henkel, L. A., &Johnson, M. K. (1997). Evaluating characteristics of false memories: Remember/know judgments and memory characteristics questionnaire compared.Memory & Cognition,25, 826–837.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, K. B. (1997). Priming on perceptual implicit memory tests can be achieved through presentation of associates.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,4, 582–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McEvoy, C. L., Nelson, D. L., &Komatsu, T. (1999). What’s the connection between true and false memories? The differential roles of interitem associations in recall and recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,25, 1177–1194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norman, K. A., &Schacter, D. L. (1997). False recognition in younger and older adults: Exploring the characteristics of illusory memories.Memory & Cognition,25, 838–848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne, D. G., Elie, C. J., Blackwell, J. M., &Neuschatz, J. S. (1996). Memory illusions: Recalling, recognizing, and recollecting events that never occurred.Journal of Memory & Language,35, 261–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Postman, L. J., &Keppel, G. (Eds.) (1970).Norms of word association. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reyna, V. F., &Brainerd, C. J. (1995). Fuzzy-trace theory: An interim synthesis.Learning & Individual Differences,7, 1–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, K. J., &Roediger, H. L., III (1997). Associative processes in false recall and false recognition.Psychological Science, 8, 231–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roediger, H. L., III,Balota, D. A., &Watson, J. M. (2001). Spreading activation and the arousal of false memories. In H. L. Roediger, III, J. S. Nairne, I. Neath, & A. M. Surprenant (Eds.),The nature of remembering: Essays in honor of Robert G. Crowder (pp. 95–115). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Roediger, H. L., III, &McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 803–814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roediger, H. L., III,Watson, J. M., McDermott, K. B., &Gallo, D.A. (2001). Factors that determine false recall: A multiple regression analysis.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,8, 385–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schacter, D. L., Israel, L., &Racine, C. (1999). Suppressing false recognition in younger and older adults: The distinctiveness heuristic.Journal of Memory & Language,40, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seamon, J. G., Luo, C. R., &Gallo, D. A. (1998). Creating false memories of words with or without recognition of list items: Evidence for nonconscious processes.Psychological Science,9, 20–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. M., Tindell, D. R., Pierce, B. H., Gilliland, T. R., &Gerkens, D. R. (2001). The use of source memory to identify one’s own episodic confusion errors.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,27, 362–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Underwood, B. J. (1965). False recognition produced by implicit verbal responses.Journal of Experimental Psychology,70, 122–129.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia

    Thomas W. Hancock

  2. Department of Psychology, Louisiana State University, 70803-5501, Baton Rouge, LA

    Jason L. Hicks

Authors
  1. Jason L. Hicks
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Thomas W. Hancock
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jason L. Hicks.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hicks, J.L., Hancock, T.W. Backward associative strength determines source attributions given to false memories. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 9, 807–815 (2002). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196339

Download citation

  • Received: 07 June 2001

  • Accepted: 17 December 2001

  • Issue Date: December 2002

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196339

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • List Item
  • Associative Strength
  • False Recognition
  • Critical Item
  • Source Memory
Download PDF

Working on a manuscript?

Avoid the common mistakes

Advertisement

Search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z

Publish with us

  • Publish your research
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our imprints

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support

95.216.99.153

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2023 Springer Nature