The emerging viewpoint of embodied cognition holds that cognitive processes are deeply rooted in the body’s interactions with the world. This position actually houses a number of distinct claims, some of which are more controversial than others. This paper distinguishes and evaluates the following six claims: (1) cognition is situated; (2) cognition is time-pressured; (3) we off-load cognitive work onto the environment; (4) the environment is part of the cognitive system; (5) cognition is for action; (6) offline cognition is body based. Of these, the first three and the fifth appear to be at least partially true, and their usefulness is best evaluated in terms of the range of their applicability. The fourth claim, I argue, is deeply problematic. The sixth claim has received the least attention in the literature on embodied cognition, but it may in fact be the best documented and most powerful of the six claims.
Agre, P. E. (1993). The symbolic worldview: Reply to Vera and Simon.Cognitive Science,17, 61–69.
Baddeley, A. (1986).Working memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Baddeley, A., &Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 18, pp. 647–667). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Ballard, D. H. (1996). On the function of visual representation. In K. A. Akins (Ed.),Perception (pp. 111–131). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ballard, D. H., Hayhoe, M. M., Pook, P. K., &Rao, R. P. N. (1997). Deictic codes for the embodiment of cognition.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,20, 723–767.
Barsalou, L. W. (1999a). Language comprehension: Archival memory or preparation for situated action?Discourse Processes,28, 61–80.
Barsalou, L. W. (1999b). Perceptual symbol systems.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,22, 577–660.
Beer, R. D. (1995). A dynamical systems perspective on agent- environment interaction.Artificial Intelligence,72, 173–215.
Beer, R. D. (2000). Dynamical approaches to cognitive science.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,4, 91–99.
Brooks, R. (1986). A robust layered control system for a mobile robot.Journal of Robotics & Automation,2, 14–23.
Brooks, R. (1991a). Intelligence without representation.Artificial Intelligence Journal,47, 139–160.
Brooks, R. (1991b). New approaches to robotics.Science,253, 1227–1232.
Brooks, R. (1999). Cambrian intelligence:The early history of the new AI. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chiel, H., &Beer, R. (1997). The brain has a body: Adaptive behavior emerges from interactions of nervous system, body, and environment.Trends in Neurosciences,20, 553–557.
Churchland, P. S., Ramachandran, V. S., &Sjenowski, T. J. (1994). A critique of pure vision. In C. Koch & J. L. Davis (Eds.),Large-scale neuronal theories of the brain (pp. 23–60). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Clark, A. (1997).Being there: Putting brain, body, and world together again. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Clark, A. (1998). Embodied, situated, and distributed cognition. In W. Bechtel & G. Graham (Eds.),A companion to cognitive science (pp. 506–517). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Clark, A., &Grush, R. (1999). Towards a cognitive robotics.Adaptive Behavior,7, 5–16.
Cohen, N. J., Eichenbaum, H., Deacedo, B. S., &Corkin, S. (1985). Different memory systems underlying acquisition of procedural and declarative knowledge. In D. S. Olton, E. Gamzu, & S. Corkin (Eds.),Memory dysfunctions: An integration of animal and human research from preclinical and clinical perspectives (Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 444, pp. 54–71). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
Craighero, L., Fadiga, L., Umiltà, C. A., &Rizzolatti, G. (1996). Evidence for visuomotor priming effect.NeuroReport,8, 347–349.
Dennett, D. (1995).Darwin’s dangerous idea. New York: Simon & Schuster.
de Waal, F. B. M. (2001).The ape and the sushi master: Cultural reflections by a primatologist. New York: Basic Books.
Epelboim, J. (1997). Deictic codes, embodiment of cognition, and the real world.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,20, 746.
Farah, M. J. (1995). The neural bases of mental imagery. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.),The cognitive neurosciences (pp. 963–975). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Fodor, J. A. (1983).The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Franklin, S. (1995).Artificial minds. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gibbs, R. W., Bogdanovich, J. M., Sykes, J. R., &Barr, D. J. (1997). Metaphor in idiom comprehension.Journal of Memory & Language,37, 141–154.
Glenberg, A. M. (1997). What memory is for.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,20, 1–55.
Glenberg, A. M., &Robertson, D. A. (1999). Indexical understanding of instructions.Discourse Processes,28, 1–26.
Glenberg, A. M., &Robertson, D. A. (2000). Symbol grounding and meaning: A comparison of high-dimensional and embodied theories of meaning.Journal of Memory & Language,43, 379–401.
Goodale, M. A., &Milner, A. D. (1992). Separate visual pathways for perception and action.Trends in Neurosciences,15, 20–25.
Goodwin, C. J. (1999).A history of modern psychology. New York: Wiley.
Grafton, S. T., Fadiga, L., Arbib, M. A., &Rizzolatti, G. (1997). Premotor cortex activation during observation and naming of familiar tools.NeuroImage,6, 231–236.
Greeno, J. G., &Moore, J. L. (1993). Situativity and symbols: Response to Vera and Simon.Cognitive Science,17, 49–59.
Grush, R. (1996).Emulation and cognition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, San Diego.
Grush, R. (1997). Yet another design for a brain? Review of Port and van Gelder (Eds.),Mind as motion. Philosophical Psychology,10, 233–242.
Grush, R. (1998).Perception, imagery, and the sensorimotor loop. www.pitt.edu/~grush/papers/%21papers.html. English translation of: Wahrnehmung, Vorstellung und die sensomotorische Schleife. In F. Esken & H.-D. Heckmann (Eds.),Bewuβtsein und Repräsentation. Paderborn, Germany: Ferdinand Schöningh.
Hutchins, E. (1995).Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Iverson, J. M., &Goldin-Meadow, S. (1998). Why people gesture when they speak.Nature,396, 228.
Jeannerod, M. (1997).The cognitive neuroscience of action. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
Johnston, W. A., Dark, V. J., &Jacoby, L. L. (1985). Perceptual fluency and recognition judgments.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,11, 3–11.
Juarrero, A. (1999).Dynamics in action: Intentional behavior as a complex system. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kaschak, M. P., &Glenberg, A. M. (2000). Constructing meaning: The role of affordances and grammatical constructions in sentence comprehension.Journal of Memory & Language,43, 508–529.
Keil, F. C. (1989).Concepts, kinds, and cognitive development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kirsh, D., &Maglio, P. (1994). On distinguishing epistemic from pragmatic action.Cognitive Science,18, 513–549.
Kosslyn, S. M. (1994).Image and brain: The resolution of the imagery debate. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kosslyn, S. M., Pascual-Leone, A., Felician, O., &Camposano, S. (1999). The role of area 17 in visual imagery: Convergent evidence from PET and rTMS.Science,284, 167–170.
Krauss, R. M. (1998). Why do we gesture when we speak?Current Directions in Psychological Science,7, 54–60.
Lakoff, G., &Johnson, M. (1980).Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G., &Johnson, M. (1999).Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.
Langacker, R. (1987, 1991).Foundations of cognitive grammar (2 vols.). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Leakey, R. (1994).The origin of humankind. New York: Basic Books.
Markman, A. B., &Dietrich, E. (2000). In defense of representation.Cognitive Psychology,40, 138–171.
Mataric, M. (1991). Navigating with a rat brain: A neurobiologically inspired model for robot spatial representation. In J.-A. Meyer & S. Wilson (Eds.),From animals to animats (pp.169–175). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Murata, A., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., Raos, V., &Rizzolatti, G. (1997). Object representation in the ventral premotor cortex (area F5) of the monkey.Journal of Neurophysiology,78, 2226–2230.
Ohlsson, S. (1999). Anchoring language in reality: Observations on reference and representation.Discourse Processes,28, 93–105.
O’Regan, J. K. (1992). Solving the “real” mysteries of visual perception: The world as an outside memory.Canadian Journal of Psychology,46, 461–488.
Parsons, L. M., Fox, P. T., Downs, J. H., Glass, T., Hirsch, T. B., Martin, C. C., Jerabek, P. A., &Lancaster, J. L. (1995). Use of implicit motor imagery for visual shape discrimination as revealed by PET.Nature,375, 54–58.
Pessoa, L., Thompson, E., &Noë, A. (1998). Finding out about fillingin: A guide to perceptual completion for visual science and the philosophy of perception.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,21, 723–802.
Pfeifer, R., &Scheier, C. (1999).Understanding intelligence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Port, R. F., &van Gelder, T. (1995).Mind as motion: Explorations in the dynamics of cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Prinz, W. (1987). Ideo-motor action. In H. Heuer & A. F. Sanders (Eds.),Perspectives on perception and action (pp. 47–76). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Putnam, H. (1970). Is semantics possible? In H. E. Kiefer & M. K. Munitz (Eds.),Language, belief and metaphysics (pp.50–63). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Quinn, R., &Espenschied, K. (1993). Control of a hexapod robot using a biologically inspired neural network. In R. Beer, R. Ritzman, & T. McKenna (Eds.),Biological neural networks in invertebrate neuroethology and robotics (pp. 365–381). San Diego: Academic Press.
Reisberg, D. (Ed.) (1992). Auditory imagery. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Rips, L. (1989). Similarity, typicality, and categorization. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.),Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 21–59). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Saito, F., &Fukuda, T. (1994). Two link robot brachiation with connectionist Q-learning. In D. Cliff (Ed.),From animals to animats 3 (pp.309–314). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Schneider, W., &Shiffrin, R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention.Psychological Review,84, 1–66.
Shiffrin, R. M., &Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory.Psychological Review,84, 127–190.
Simons, D. J., &Levin, D. T. (1997). Change blindness.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,1, 261–267.
Slater, C. (1997). Conceptualizing a sunset ≠ using a sunset as a discriminative stimulus.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,20, 37–38.
Steels, L., &Brooks, R. (1995).The artificial life route to artificial intelligence: Building embodied, situated agents. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Stein, L. (1994). Imagination and situated cognition.Journal of Experimental Theoretical Artificial Intelligence,6, 393–407.
Talmy, L. (2000).Toward a cognitive semantics: Vol. I. Conceptual structuring systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Thelen, E., &Smith, L. B. (1994).A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Tomasello, M. (1998). Cognitive linguistics. In W. Bechtel & G. Graham (Eds.),A companion to cognitive science (pp. 477–487). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Tucker, M., &Ellis, R. (1998). On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 830–846.
Uexküll, J. von (1934). A stroll through the worlds of animals and men. In C. H. Schiller (Ed.),Instinctive behavior: The development of modern concept (pp. 5–80). New York: International Universities Press.
Uleman, J., &Bargh, J. (Eds.) (1989).Unintended thought. New York: Guilford.
van Gelder, T., &Port, R. (1995). It’s about time: An overview of the dynamical approach to cognition. In R. Port & T. van Gelder (Eds.),Mind as motion: Explorations in the dynamics of cognition(pp. 1–43). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Vera, A. H., &Simon, H. A. (1993). Situated action: A symbolic interpretation.Cognitive Science,17, 7–48.
Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mediated action. In W. Bechtel & G. Graham (Eds.),A companion to cognitive science (pp. 518–525). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Wiles, J., &Dartnall, T. (1999).Perspectives on cognitive science: Theories, experiments, and foundations. Stamford, CT: Ablex.
Wilson, M. (2001a). The case for sensorimotor coding in working memory.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,8, 44–57.
Wilson, M. (2001b). Perceiving imitatible stimuli: Consequences of isomorphism between input and output.Psychological Bulletin,127, 543–553.
Wilson, M., &Emmorey, K. (1997). A visuospatial “phonological loop” in working memory: Evidence from American Sign Language.Memory & Cognition,25, 313–320.
Wilson, M., &Emmorey, K. (1998). A “word length effect” for sign language: Further evidence for the role of language in structuring working memory.Memory & Cognition,26, 584–590.
Zwaan, R. A. (1999). Embodied cognition, perceptual symbols, and situation models.Discourse Processes,28, 81–88.
About this article
Cite this article
Wilson, M. Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 9, 625–636 (2002). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196322
- Time Pressure
- Implicit Memory
- Cognitive Architecture
- Early Human
- Situate Cognition