Abstract
Ten-year-old children performed a fragment completion task. Target fragments (e.g., T_ _N) were preceded by four types of study conditions. The identity condition consisted of the target (TURN). The morphological condition included a related form (TURNED). The orthographic condition consisted of morphologically unrelated words (e.g., TURNIP). Finally, no similar word was presented in the study phase of the no-prime condition. Morphological relatives included orthographically transparent (TURNED- TURN) and orthographically opaque (RIDDEN-RIDE) forms. The results indicated that performance of child readers on the fragment completion task was sensitive to morphological relationships. Completion rates following opaque, as well as transparent, morphological relatives were significantly greater than those following orthographically similar forms. In sum, the fragment completion task provides a viable new tool for examining morphological processing in children and for differentiating morphological effects from effects of similar form.
Article PDF
References
Bentin, S., &Feldman, L. B. (1990). The contribution of morphological and semantic relatedness to repetition priming at short and long lags: Evidence from Hebrew.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,42A, 693–711.
Berko, J. (1958). The child's learning of English morphology.Word,14, 150–177.
Bradley, L., &Bryant, P. E. (1983). Categorizing sounds and learning to read: A causal connection.Nature,301, 419–421.
Britain, M. (1970). Inflectional performance and early reading achievement.Reading Research Quarterly,6, 34–38.
Bryant, P., &Bradley, L. (1985).Children's reading problems. Oxford: Blackwell.
Burani, C., &Laudanna, A. (1992). Units of representation for derived words in the lexicon. In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.),Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (Advances in psychology, Vol. 94, pp. 27–44). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Carlisle, J. F. (1987). The use of morphological knowledge in spelling derived forms by learning disabled and normal students.Annals of Dyslexia, 37, 90–108.
Carlisle, J. F. (1988). Knowledge of derivational morphology and spelling ability in fourth, sixth, and eighth graders.Applied Psycholinguistics,9, 247–266.
Carlisle, J. F. (1995). Morphological awareness and early reading achievement. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.),Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 189–209). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Drews, E., &Zwitserlood, P. (1995). Morphological and orthographic similarity in visual word recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,21, 1098–1116.
Elbro, C. (1989). Morphological awareness in dyslexia. In C. von Euler (Ed.),Brain and reading (Wenner-Gren international symposium series, Vol. 54). Basingstoke, U.K.: Macmillan.
Feldman, L. B. (2000). Are morphological effects distinguishable from the effects of shared meaning and shared form?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 1431–1444.
Feldman, L. B., &Moskovljevi 'c, J. (1987). Repetition priming is not purely episodic in origin.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,13, 573–581.
Fowler, A., Feldman. L. B., Andjelkovi'c, D., & Oney, B. (in press). Morphological and phonological analysis by beginning readers: Evidence from Serbo-Croatian and Turkish. In E. Assink & D. Sandra (Eds.),Reading complex words: Neuropsychology and cognition. Amsterdam: Kluwer.
Fowler, A., &Liberman, I. (1995). Morphological awareness as related to early reading and spelling ability. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.),Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 157–188). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Fox, B., &Routh, D. K. (1976). Phonemic analysis and synthesis as word attack skills.Journal of Educational Psychology,68, 70–74.
Frost, R., Forster, K., &Deutsch, A. (1997). What can we learn from the morphology of Hebrew? A masked priming investigation of morphological representation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 829–856.
Gonnerman, L. M., Andersen, J. T., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1999).Graded semantic and phonological effects in priming: Evidence for a distributed connectionist approach. Manuscript submitted for publication.Harris, A. J., & Jacobson, M. D. (1982).Basic reading vocabularies. New York: Macmillan.
Komatsu, S. I., Naito, M., &Fuke, T. (1996). Age-related and intelligence-related differences in implicit memory: Effects of generation on a word-fragment completion test.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,62, 151–172.
Liberman, I. Y., Shankweiler, D., &Liberman, A. M. (1989). The alphabetic principle and learning to read. In D. Shankweiler & I. Y. Liberman (Eds.),Phonology and reading disability (pp. 1–33). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Marslen-Wilson, W., Tyler, L. K., Waksler, R., &Older, L. (1994). Morphology and meaning in the English lexicon.Psychological Review,101, 3–33.
Naito, M. (1990). Repetition priming in children and adults: Age-related dissociation between implicit and explicit memory.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,50, 462–484.
Napps, S. E. (1989). Morphemic relationships in the lexicon: Are they distinct from semantic and formal relationships?Memory & Cognition,17, 729–739.
Pinker, S. (1991). Rules of language.Science,153, 530–535.
Pinker, S., &Prince, A. (1988). On language and connectionism: Analysis of a parallel distributed processing model of language acquisition.Cognition,28, 73–193.
Raveh, M., &Rueckl, J. (2000). Equivalent effects of inflected and derived primes: Long-term morphological priming in fragment completion and lexical decision.Journal of Memory & Language,42, 103–119.
Rubin, H. (1988). Morphological knowledge and early writing ability.Language & Speech,31, 337–355.
Rueckl, J. G., Mikolinski, M., Raveh, M., Miner, C. S., &Mars, F. (1997). Morphological priming, connectionist networks, and masked fragment completion.Journal of Memory & Language,36, 382–405.
Stanners, R. F., Neiser, J. J., Hernon, W. P., &Hall, R. (1979). Memory representation for morphologically related words.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,18, 399–412.
Stolz, J. A., &Feldman, L. B. (1995). The role of orthographic and semantic transparency of the base morpheme in morphological processing. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.),Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 109–130). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Tunmer, W. (1988). Metalinguistic abilities and beginning reading.Reading Research Quarterly,23, 134–158.
Yopp, H. K. (1988). The validity and reliability of phonemic awareness tests.Reading Research Quarterly,23, 159–177.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The research reported here was supported by funds from National Institute of Child Health and Development Grant HD-01994 to Haskins Laboratories
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Feldman, L.B., Rueckl, J., Diliberto, K. et al. Morphological analysis by child readers as revealed by the fragment completion task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 9, 529–535 (2002). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196309
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196309