Abstract
When two masked targets (T1 and T2), both requiring attention, are presented within half a second of each other, report of the second target is poor, demonstrating an attentional blink (AB). Potter, Chun, Banks, and Muckenhoupt (1998) argued that all previous demonstrations of an AB occurring when one or more targets were presented outside the visual modality did not represent true AB but were, instead, artifactual, resulting from switching of task set. In the present experiments, T1 and T2 modalities were independent and varied randomly from trial to trial, allowing no useful preparatory task-set switching from T1 to T2. However, reliable ABs were observed when both targets were visual, when both targets were auditory, and cross-modally when T2s were visual. Furthermore, the ABs observed for crossmodality visual T2s showed the characteristic U-shaped pattern often found in AB experiments in which two visual targets are used—a pattern that should not be observed under task-set switching conditions. These results provide evidence that cross-modality AB can be found under conditions that do not allow useful preparatory task-set switching.
Article PDF
References
Allport, D. A., Styles, E. A., &Hsieh, S. (1994). Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Eds.),Attention and Performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (pp. 421–452). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Arnell, K. M., &Duncan, J. (2002). Separate and shared sources of dual-task cost in stimulus identification and response selection.Cognitive Psychology,44, 105–147.
Arnell, K. M., &Jolicoeur, P. (1999). The attentional blink across stimulus modalities: Evidence for central processing limitations.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,25, 630–648.
Broadbent, D. E., &Broadbent, M. H. P. (1987). From detection to identification: Response to multiple targets in rapid serial visual presentation.Perception & Psychophysics,42, 105–113.
Chun, M. M., &Potter, M. C. (1995). A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,21, 109–127.
Cohen, J., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., &Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers.Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,25, 257–271.
Duncan, J., Martens, S., &Ward, R. (1997). Restricted attentional capacity within but not between sensory modalities.Nature,387, 808–810.
Duncan, J., Ward, R., &Shapiro, K. L. (1994). Direct measurement of attentional dwell time in human vision.Nature,369, 313–315.
Jolicoeur, P. (1999). Restricted attentional capacity between sensory modalities.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,6, 87–92.
Kanwisher, N. G. (1987). Repetition blindness: Type recognition without token individuation.Cognition,27, 117–143.
Miller, M. D., &MacKay, D. G. (1994). Repetition deafness: Repeated words in computer-compressed speech are difficult to encode and recall.Psychological Science,5, 47–51.
Mondor, T. A. (1998). A transient processing deficit following selection of an auditory target.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,5, 305–311.
Potter, M. C., Chun, M. M., Banks, B. S., &Muckenhoupt, M. (1998). Two attentional deficits in serial target search: The visual attentional blink and an amodal task-switch operation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 979–992.
Raymond, J. E., Shapiro, K. L., &Arnell, K. M. (1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,18, 849–860.
Raymond, J. E., Shapiro, K. L., &Arnell, K. M. (1995). Similarity determines the attentional blink.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,21, 653–662.
Rogers, R. D., &Monsell, S. (1995). Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,124, 207–231.
Shapiro, K. L., Raymond, J. E., &Arnell, K. M. (1994). Attention to visual pattern information produces the attentional blink in rapid serial visual presentation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 357–371.
Shulman, H., & Hsieh, V. (1995, November).The attention blink in mixed modality streams. Paper presented at the 36th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Los Angeles.
Soto-Faraco, S., Spence, C., Fairbank, K., Kingstone, A., Hillstrom, A. P., & Shapiro, K. L. (in press). A crossmodal attentional blink between vision and touch.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.
Visser, T. A. W., Bischof, W. F., &Di Lollo, V. (1999). Attentional switching in spatial and nonspatial domains: Evidence from the attentional blink.Psychological Bulletin,125, 458–469.
Ward, R., Duncan, J., &Shapiro, K. L. (1996). The slow time-course of visual attention.Cognitive Psychology,30, 79–109.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Portions of this work were presented at the November 1999 Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society in Los Angeles. This project was funded by an EPSCoR start-up grant provided to the first author.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Arnell, K.M., Larson, J.M. Cross-modality attentional blinks without preparatory task-set switching. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 9, 497–506 (2002). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196305
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196305