Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
  • Log in
  1. Home
  2. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  3. Article
The Doppler effect is not what you think it is: Dramatic pitch change due to dynamic intensity change
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Brief Reports
  • Published: June 2002

The Doppler effect is not what you think it is: Dramatic pitch change due to dynamic intensity change

  • Michael K. Mcbeath1 &
  • John G. Neuhoff2 

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review volume 9, pages 306–313 (2002)Cite this article

  • 1045 Accesses

  • 27 Citations

  • Metrics details

Abstract

Historically, auditory pitch has been considered to be a function of acoustic frequency, with only a small effect being due to absolute intensity. Yet we found that when tones are Doppler shifted so that frequency drops, the pitch dramatically rises and falls, closely following the pattern of dynamic intensity change. We show that continuous intensity change can produce pitch variation comparable to a frequency change approaching an octave. This effect opposes and is an order of magnitude larger than the well-known effect of discrete intensity change in the frequency range employed. We propose that the perceptual interaction of continuous changes in pitch and loudness reflects a natural correlation between changes in frequency and intensity that is neurally encoded to facilitate the parsing and processing of meaningful acoustic patterns.

Download to read the full article text

Working on a manuscript?

Avoid the most common mistakes and prepare your manuscript for journal editors.

Learn more

References

  • Alain, C. (1993). The relation among fundamental frequency, intensity, and duration varies with accentuation.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,944, 2434–2436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ANSI (1994).Acoustical Terminology S1 No. American National Standards Institute.

  • Ashmead, D. H., Davis, D. L., &Northington, A. (1995). Contribution of listeners’ approaching motion to auditory distance perception.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,21, 239–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, J. (1993).Cranks, quarks, and the cosmos. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bismarck, G. von (1974). Timbre of steady state sounds: A factorial investigation of its verbal attributes.Acustica,30, 146–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boltz, M. G. (1998). Tempo discrimination of musical patterns: Effects due to pitch and rhythmic structure.Perception & Psychophysics,60, 1357–1373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bregman, A. (1994).Auditory scene analysis: Perceptual organization of sound. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, Bradford Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, M., Doherty, E. T., &Shipp, T. (1994). Speech measures indicating workload demand.Aviation, Space, & Environmental Medicine,651, 21–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutler, A., &Butterfield, S. (1991). Word boundary cues in clear speech: A supplementary report.Speech Communication,104, 335–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doppler, J. C. (1842). Über das farbige Licht der Doppelsterne und einiger anderer Gestirne des Himmels. InVersuch einer das Bradley’sche aberrations-theorem als integrirrenden Theil in sich schliessenden allgemeineren Theorie (p. 465). Prague: K. Böhm Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, C. S., Gaioni, S. J., &McBeath, M. K. (1985). A microcomputer system for the measurement of avian heart rate.Bird Behavior,6, 41–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, C., &Tokura, H. (1995). The given-new contract in speech to infants.Journal of Memory & Language,34, 287–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaioni, S. J., &Evans, C. S. (1989). Perception of the frequency characteristics of the distress calls by mallard ducklings.Behaviour,111, 13–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garner, W. R. (1974).The processing of information and structure. Potomac, MD: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, J. L. (1973). An optimum processor theory for the central formation of the pitch of complex tones.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,54, 1496–1516.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grau, J. W., &Kemler-Nelson, D. G. (1988). The distinction between integral and separable dimensions: Evidence for the integrality of pitch and loudness.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,117, 347–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grey, J. M. (1977). Multidimensional perceptual scaling of musical timbres.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,61, 1270–1277.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gulick, W. L. (1971).Hearing: Physiology and psychophysics. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, W. M. (1988). Pitch perception and the segregation and integration of auditory entities. In G.M. Edelman, W. E. Gall, & W. M. Cowan (Eds.),Auditory function (pp. 623–645). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, W. M. (1996). Pitch, periodicity and auditory organization.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,100, 3491–3502.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hassett, S. (1999).Just discriminable change of velocity of a simulated moving sound source. Unpublished undergraduate thesis, Ohio State University.

  • Helmholtz, H. L. F. von (1954). The sensations of tone as a physiological basis for the theory of music (2nd English ed.; A. J. Ellis, Trans.). New York: Dover. (Original work published 1855)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorasz, U., &Dooley, G. J. (1996). The perceptibility of the frequency drop caused by the Doppler effect for simulated sound source motion in the median plane.Archives of Acoustics,21, 149–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, D. N. (1990). Getting around with light or sound. In R. Warren & A.H. Wertheim (Eds.),Perception and control of self motion: Resources for ecological psychology (pp. 487–505). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, D. N., &Simmons, J. A. (1995). Steering by echolocation: A paradigm of ecological acoustics.Journal of Comparative Physiology A,176, 347–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, D. N., van der Weel, F.R., Hitchcock, T., Matejowsky, E., &Pettigrew, J. D. (1992). Common principle of guidance by echolocation and vision.Journal of Comparative Physiology,171, 563–571.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lipkin, R. (1995). Device measures speed of white light.Science News,148, 215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lufti, R. A., &Wang, W. (1999). Correlational analysis of acoustic cues for the discrimination of auditory motion.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,106, 919–928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melara, R. D., Marks, L. E., &Potts, B. C. (1993). Early-holistic processing or dimensional similarity?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,19, 1114–1120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neuhoff, J. G. (1998). A perceptual bias for rising tones.Nature.395, 123–124.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Neuhoff, J. G. (1999). Perception of changes in loudness: Reply to Canèvet et al.Nature,398, 673–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neuhoff, J. G. (2001) An adaptive bias in the perception of looming auditory motion.Ecological Psychology,13, 87–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neuhoff, J. G., &McBeath, M. K. (1996). The Doppler illusion: The influence of dynamic intensity on perceived pitch.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,22, 970–985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neuhoff, J. G. &McBeath, M. K. (1997). Overcoming naive mental models in explaining the Doppler shift: An illusion creates confusion.American Journal of Physics,65, 618–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neuhoff, J. G., McBeath, M. K., &Wanzie, W. C. (1999). Dynamic frequency change influences loudness perception: A central, analytic process.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,25, 1050–1059.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollack, I. (1968). Auditory pulsed Doppler discrimination.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,44, 592–598.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Repp, B. H. (1995). Detectability of duration and intensity increments in melody tones: A partial connection between music perception and performance.Perception & Psychophysics,57, 1217–1232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, W. L., &Bregman, A. S. (1998). Cumulation of the tendency to segregate auditory streams: Resetting by changes in location and loudness.Perception & Psychophysics,60, 1216–1277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblum, L. D., Carello, C., &Pastore, R. E. (1987). Relative effectiveness of three stimulus variables for locating a moving sound source.Perception,16, 175–186.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblum, L. D., Gordon, M. S., &Jarquin, L. (2000). Echolocating distance by moving and stationary listeners.Ecological Psychology,12, 181–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, M. K., &Turvey, M. T. (1999). Auditory perception of unimpeded passage.Ecological Psychology,11, 175–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saberi, K., &Hafter, E. R. (1995). A common neural code for frequency- and amplitude-modulated sounds.Nature,374, 537–539.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scharf, B., &Houtsma, A. J. M. (1986). Audition: II. Loudness, pitch, localization, aural distortion, pathology. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.),Handbook of perception and human performance (pp. 15-1 to 15-60). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharine, A. A., & McBeath, M. K. (2001, April).Evidence for a correlation between frequency and intensity. Paper presented at the 81st Annual Convention of the Western Psychological Association, Lahaina, Hawaii.

  • Schenkman, B. N., &Jansson, G. (1986). The detection and localization of objects by the blind with the aid of long-cane tapping sounds.Human Factors,28, 607–618.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, B. K., McGowan, R. S., &Turvey, M. T. (1991). An acoustic variable specifying time to contact.Ecological Psychology,3, 253–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snow, W. B. (1936). Changes of pitch with loudness at low frequencies.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,8, 14–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Speaks, C. E. (1992).Introduction to sound: Acoustics for the hearing and speech sciences. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, S. S. (1935). The relation of pitch to intensity.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,6, 150–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoffregen, T. A., &Pittenger, J. B. (1995). Human echolocation as a basic form of perception and action.Ecological Psychology,7, 181–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tekman, H. G. (1997). Interactions of perceived intensity, duration, and pitch in pure tone sequences.Music Perception,14, 281–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tekman, H. G. (1998). Effects of melodic accents on perception of intensity.Music Perception,15, 391–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terhardt, E. (1974). Pitch of pure tones: Its relation to intensity. In E. Zwicker & E. Terhardt (Eds.),Facts and models in hearing (pp. 353–360). Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tian, B., &Rauschecker, J. P. (1994). Processing frequency-modulated sounds in the cat’s anterior auditory field.Journal of Neurophysiology,71, 1959–1975.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Verschuure, J., &van Meeteren, A. A. (1975). The effect of intensity on pitch.Acustica,32, 33–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wightman, F. L., &Jenison, R. (1995). Auditory spatial layout. In W. Epstein & S. Rogers (Eds.),Perception of space and motion: Handbook of perception and cognition (pp. 365–400). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zelick, R., Rose, G., &Rand, A. S. (1991). Differential response to frequency modulation rate and direction by the neotropical frog, Physalaemus pustulosus.Animal Behaviour,42, 413–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona

    Michael K. Mcbeath

  2. Department of Psychology, College of Wooster, 44691, Wooster, OH

    John G. Neuhoff

Authors
  1. Michael K. Mcbeath
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. John G. Neuhoff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John G. Neuhoff.

Additional information

This work was supported in part by a grant from Interval Research Corporation to M.K.M., a grant from the National Science Foundation to J.G.N., and a faculty development grant from the College of Wooster.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mcbeath, M.K., Neuhoff, J.G. The Doppler effect is not what you think it is: Dramatic pitch change due to dynamic intensity change. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 9, 306–313 (2002). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196286

Download citation

  • Received: 04 December 2000

  • Accepted: 11 June 2001

  • Issue Date: June 2002

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196286

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Sound Source
  • Acoustical Society
  • Music Perception
  • Pitch Change
  • Pitch Perception
Download PDF

Working on a manuscript?

Avoid the most common mistakes and prepare your manuscript for journal editors.

Learn more

Advertisement

Over 10 million scientific documents at your fingertips

Switch Edition
  • Academic Edition
  • Corporate Edition
  • Home
  • Impressum
  • Legal information
  • Privacy statement
  • California Privacy Statement
  • How we use cookies
  • Manage cookies/Do not sell my data
  • Accessibility
  • FAQ
  • Contact us
  • Affiliate program

Not logged in - 185.186.9.21

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG. Part of Springer Nature.