A check detection task in a 5 × 5 section of the chessboard, containing a King and one or two potential checking pieces was employed. The checking status (i.e., the presence or absence of a check) and the number of attackers (one or two) were manipulated. It was found that the reaction time cost for adding a distractor was differentially greater inno trials thanyes trials for novice, but not for expert, chess players. In addition, we contrasted standard check detection trials with trials in which one of two attackers was cued (colored red) and the task was to determine the checking status of the cued attacker while ignoring the other attacker. We documented a Stroop-like interference effect on trials in which a cued nonchecking attacker appeared together with an attacker that was checking (i.e., incongruent). These findings suggest automatic and parallel encoding procedures for chess relations in experts.
Bachmann, T., &Oit, M. (1992). Stroop-like interference in chess players’ imagery: An unexplored possibility to be revealed by the adapted moving-spot task.Psychological Research,54, 27–31.
Baron, J. (1978). The word-superiority effect: Perceptual learning from reading. In W. K. Estes (Ed.),Handbook of learning and cognitive processes (Vol. 6, pp. 131–166). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Besner, D., &Stolz, J. A. (1999a). Unconsciously controlled processing: The Stroop effect reconsidered.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,6, 449–455.
Besner, D., &Stolz, J. A. (1999b). What kind of attention modulates the Stroop effect?Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,6, 99–104.
Besner, D., Stolz, J. A., &Boutilier, C. (1997). The Stroop effect and the myth of automaticity.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,4, 221–225.
Biederman, I. (1972). Perceiving real world scenes.Science,177, 77–80.
Biederman, I. (1981). On the semantics of a glance at a scene. In M. Kubovy & J. R. Pomerantz (Eds.),Perceptual organization (pp. 213–253). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Biederman, I., Glass, A. L., &Stacey, E. W., Jr. (1973). Scanning for objects in real world scenes.Journal of Experimental Psychology,97, 22–27.
Chase, W. G., &Simon, H. A. (1973a). The mind’s eye in chess. In W.G. Chase (Ed.),Visual information processing (pp. 215–281). New York: Academic Press.
Chase, W. G., &Simon, H. A. (1973b). Perception in chess.Cognitive Psychology,4, 55–81.
Church, R. M., &Church, K. W. (1983). Plans, goals, and search strategies for the selection of a move in chess. In P. W. Frey (Ed.),Chess skill in man and machine (2nd ed., pp. 131–156). New York: Springer-Verlag.
de Groot, A. D. (1978).Thought and choice in chess. (2nd ed.). The Hague: Mouton.
de Groot, A. D., &Gobet, F. (1996).Perception and memory in chess. Assen, The Netherlands: Van Gorcum.
Ellis, S. H. (1973). Structure and experience in the matching and reproduction of chess patterns.Dissertation Abstracts International, 34, 5B (University Microfilms No. AAG73-26954).
Frensch, P. A., &Sternberg, R. J. (1989). Expertise and intelligent thinking: When is it worse to know better? In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.),Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (Vol. 5, pp. 157–188). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Gobet, F., &Simon, H. A. (1996a). Recall of random and distorted chess positions: Implications for the theory of expertise.Memory & Cognition,24, 493–503.
Gobet, F., &Simon, H. A. (1996b). Templates in chess memory: A mechanism for recalling several boards.Cognitive Psychology,31, 1–40.
Gobet, F., &Simon, H. A. (2000). Five seconds or sixty? Presentation time in expert memory.Cognitive Science,24, 651–682.
Gyoba, J., Arimura, M., &Maruyama, K. (1980). Visual identification of line segments embedded in human face patterns.Tohoku Psychologica Folia,39, 113–120.
Homa, D., Haver, B., &Schwartz, T. (1976). Perceptibility of schematic face stimuli: Evidence for a perceptual Gestalt.Memory & Cognition,4, 176–185.
Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory.Journal of Memory & Language,30, 513–541.
Jacoby, L. L., Ste-Marie, D., &Toth, J. T. (1993). Redefining automaticity: Unconscious influences, awareness and control. In A. D. Baddeley & L. Weiskrantz (Eds.),Attention, selection, awareness and control: A tribute to Donald Broadbent (pp. 261–282). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Johnston, J. C. (1981). Understanding word perception: Clues from studying the word-superiority effect. In O. J. L. Tzeng & H. Singer (Eds.),Perception of print: Reading research in experimental psychology (pp. 65–84). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Jongman, R. W. (1968).Het oog van de meester [The eye of the master]. Assen, The Netherlands: Van Gorcum.
Krueger, L. E. (1975). Familiarity effects in visual information processing.Psychological Bulletin,82, 949–974.
MacLeod, C. M. (1992). The Stroop task: The “gold standard” of attentional measures.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,121, 12–14.
McClelland, J. L. (1979). On the time relations of mental processes: A framework for analyzing processes in cascade.Psychological Review,86, 287–330.
McConkie, G. W., &Rayner, K. (1975). The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading.Perception & Psychophysics,17, 578–586.
Milojkovic, J. D. (1982). Chess imagery in novice and master.Journal of Mental Imagery,6, 125–144.
Palmer, S. E. (1975). The effects of contextual scenes on the identification of objects.Memory & Cognition,3, 519–526.
Purcell, D. G., &Stewart, A. L. (1986). The face-detection effect.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,24, 118–120.
Purcell, D. G., &Stewart, A. L. (1988). The face-detection effect: Configuration enhances detection.Perception & Psychophysics,43, 355–366.
Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research.Psychological Bulletin,124, 372–422.
Reingold, E. M. (1995). Facilitation and interference in indirect/implicit memory tests and in the process dissociation paradigm: The letter insertion and the letter deletion tasks.Consciousness & Cognition,4, 459–482.
Reingold, E. M., Charness, N., Pomplun, M., &Stampe, D. M. (2001). Visual span in expert chess players: Evidence from eye movements.Psychological Science,12, 49–56.
Reingold, E. M., &Jolicoeur, P. (1993). Perceptual versus postperceptual mediation of visual context effects: Evidence from the lettersuperiority effect.Perception & Psychophysics,53, 166–178.
Reingold, E. M., &Toth, J. P. (1996). Process dissociations versus task dissociations: A controversy in progress. In G. Underwood (Ed.),Implicit cognition (pp. 159–202). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rensink, R. A., O’Regan, J. K., &Clark, J. J. (1997). To see or not to see: The need for attention to perceive changes in scenes.Psychological Science,8, 368–373.
Saariluoma, P. (1984).Coding problem spaces in chess. (Commentationes Scientiarum Socialium, Vol. 23). Turku: Societas Scientiarum Fennica.
Saariluoma, P. (1985). Chess players’ intake of task-relevant cues.Memory & Cognition,13, 385–391.
Saariluoma, P. (1990). Apperception and restructuring in chess players’ problem solving. In K. J. Gilhooly, M. T. G. Keane, R. H. Logie, & G. Erdos (Eds.),Lines of thought: Reflections on the psychology of thinking (pp. 41–57). London: Wiley.
Saariluoma, P. (1994). Location coding in chess.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,47A, 607–630.
Schendel, J. D., &Shaw, P. (1976). A test of the generality of the word-context effect.Perception & Psychophysics,19, 383–393.
Simon, H. A., &Barenfeld, M. (1969). Information-processing analysis of perceptual processes in problem solving.Psychological Review,76, 473–483.
Simon, H. A., &Gilmartin, K. (1973). A simulation of memory for chess positions.Cognitive Psychology,5, 29–46.
Simons, D. J., &Levin, D. T. (1997). Change blindness.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,1, 261–267.
Stolz, J. A., &Besner, D. (1996). Role of set in visual word recognition: Activation and activation blocking as nonautomatic processes.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,22,1166–11777.
Stolz, J. A., &Besner, D. (1999). On the myth of automatic semantic activation in reading.Current Directions in Psychological Science,8, 61–65.
Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions.Journal of Experimental Psychology,18, 643–661.
Tikhomirov, O. K., &Poznyanskaya, E. (1966). An investigation of visual search as a means of analyzing heuristics.Soviet Psychology,5, 2–15.
Toth, J. P., Reingold, E. M., &Jacoby, L. L. (1994). Toward a redefinition of implicit memory: Process dissociations following elaborative processing and self-generation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 290–303.
Treisman, A., &Gelade, G. (1980). A feature integration theory of attention.Cognitive Psychology,12, 97–136.
van Santen, J. P. H., &Jonides, J. (1978). A replication of the facesuperiority effect.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,12, 378–380.
Winikoff, A. W. (1967).Eye movements as an aid to protocol analysis of problem solving behavior. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh.
Wolfe, J. M. (1998). Visual search. In H. Pashler (Ed.),Attention (pp. 13–73). Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press/Erlbaum.
Preparation of this paper was supported by a grant to E.M.R. from the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada and by NIA Grant 5R01 AG13969 to N.C.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Reingold, E.M., Charness, N., Schultetus, R.S. et al. Perceptual automaticity in expert chess players: Parallel encoding of chess relations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 8, 504–510 (2001). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196185
- Stroop Effect
- Congruent Condition
- Check Status
- Skilled Player
- Reaction Time Cost