Factors that determine false recall: A multiple regression analysis

Abstract

In the Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) paradigm, subjects study lists of words that are designed to elicit the recall of an associatively related critical item. The 55 lists we have developed provide levels of false recall ranging from .01 to .65, and understanding this variability should provide a key to understanding this memory illusion. Using a simultaneous multiple regression analysis, we assessed the contribution of seven factors in creating false recall of critical items in the DRM paradigm. This analysis accounted for approximately 68% of the variance in false recall, with two main predictors: associative connections from the study words to the critical item (r+.73; semipartialr+.60) and recallability of the lists (r+.43; semipartialr-.34). Taken together, the variance in false recall captured by these predictors accounted for 84% of the variance that can be explained, given the reliability of the false recall measures (r=.90). Therefore, the results of this analysis strongly constrain theories of false memory in this paradigm, suggesting that at least two factors determine the propensity of DRM lists to elicit false recall. The results fit well within the theoretical framework postulating that both semantic activation of the critical item and strategic monitoring processes influence the probability of false recall and false recognition in this paradigm.

References

  1. Anderson, J. R. (1972). FRAN: A simulation model of free recall. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 5, pp. 315–378). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson, J. R. (1983).The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Anderson, J. R., &Pirolli, P. L. (1984). Spread of activation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,10, 791–798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Balota, D. A., Cortese, M. J., Duchek, J. M., Adams, D., Roediger, H. L., III,McDermott, K. B., &Yerys, B. E. (1999). Veridical and false memories in healthy older adults and in dementia of the Alzheimers type.Cognitive Neuropsychology,16, 361–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Balota, D. A., Dolan, P. O., &Duchek, J. M. (2000). Memory changes in healthy older adults. In E. Tulving & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.),The Oxford handbook of memory (pp. 395–409). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Balota, D. A., &Duchek, J. M. (1988). Age-related differences in lexical access, spreading activation, and simple pronunciation.Psychology and Aging,3, 84–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Balota, D. A. &Duchek, J. (1991). Semantic priming effects, lexical repetition effects, and contextual disambiguation effects in healthy aged individuals and individuals with senile dementia of the Alzheimer type.Brain & Language,40, 181–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bartlett, F. C. (1932).Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Brainerd, C. J., Wright, R., Reyna, V. F., &Mojardin, A. H. (2001). Conjoint recognition and phantom recollection.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,27, 307–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bruce, D., &Winograd, E. (1998). Remembering Deese’s 1959 articles: The Zeitgeist, the sociology of science, and false memories.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,5, 615–624.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bruner, J. S. (1957). On perceptual readiness.Psychological Review,64, 123–152.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Budson, A. E., Daffner, K. R., Desikan, R., &Schacter, D. L. (2000). When false recognition is unopposed by true recognition: Gist-based memory distortion in Alzheimer’s disease.Neuropsychology,14, 277–287.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Collins, A. M., &Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic memory.Psychological Review,82, 407–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J. T., &Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dormic (Ed.),Attention and performance VI (pp. 535–555). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Deese, J. (1959a). Influence of interitem associative strength upon immediate free recall.Psychological Reports,5, 235–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Deese, J. (1959b). On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology,58, 17–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Deese, J. (1961). Associative structure and the serial reproduction experiment.Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology,63, 95–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Deese, J. (1965).The structure of associations in language and thought. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gallo, D. A., McDermott, K. B., Percer, J. M., &Roediger, H. L., III. (2001). Modality effects in false recall and false recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,27, 339–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gallo, D. A., Roberts, M. J., &Seamon, J. G. (1997). Remembering words not presented in lists: Can we avoid creating false memories?Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,4, 271–276.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gallo, D. A., & Roediger, H. L., III (2001).Variability among word lists in evoking associative memory illusions. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  22. Gallo, D. A., Roediger, H. L., III, &McDermott, K. B. (2001). Associative false recognition occurs without strategic criterion shifts.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,8, 579–586.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hicks, J. L., &Marsh, R. L. (2001). False recognition occurs more frequently during source identification than during old-new recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,27, 375–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hunt, R. R., &Einstein, G. O. (1981). Relational and item-specific information in memory.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,19, 497–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hunt, R. R., &McDaniel, M. A. (1993). The enigma of organization and distinctiveness.Journal of Memory & Language,32, 421–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Israel, L., &Schacter, D. L. (1997). Pictorial encoding reduces false recognition of semantic associates.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,4, 577–581.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Jacoby, L. L., Kelley, C. M., &Dywan, J. (1989). Memory attributions. In H. L. Roediger III & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.),Varieties of memory and consciousness: Essays in honour of Endel Tulving (pp. 391–422). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., &Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring.Psychological Bulletin,114, 3–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Johnson, M. K., &Raye, C. L. (1981). Reality monitoring.Psychological Review,88, 67–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kellogg, R.T. (2001). Presentation modality and mode of recall in verbal false memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,27, 913–919.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kirkpatrick, E. A. (1894). An experimental study of memory.Psychological Review,1, 602–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kučcera, H., &Francis, W. (1967).Computational analysis of presentday American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Marsh, E. J., McDermott, K. B., & Roediger, H. L., III (2001). Do retrieval factors play a role in the creation of of falsememories? Manuscript submitted for publication.

  34. Mather, M., Henkel, L. A., &Johnson, M. J. (1997). Evaluating characteristics of false memories: Remember/know judgments and memory characteristics questionnaire compared.Memory & Cognition,25, 826–837.

    Google Scholar 

  35. McDermott, K. B. (1996). The persistence of false memories in list recall.Journal of Memory & Language,35, 212–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. McDermott, K. B. (1997). Priming on perceptual implicit memory tests can be achieved through presentation of associates.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,4, 582–586.

    Google Scholar 

  37. McDermott, K. B., &Roediger, H. L., III (1998). Attempting to avoid illusory memories: Robust false recognition of associates persists under conditions of explicit warnings and immediate testing.Journal of Memory & Language,39, 508–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. McDermott, K. B., &Watson, J. M. (2001). The rise and fall of false recall: The impact of presentation duration.Journal of Memory & Language,45, 160–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. McEvoy, C. L., Nelson, D. L., &Komatsu, T. (1999). What is the connection between true and false memories? The differential roles of interitem associations in recall and recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,25, 1177–1194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Meyer, D. E., &Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1971). Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: Evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations.Journal of Experimental Psychology,90, 227–234.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Miller, M. B., &Wolford, G. L. (1999). Theoretical commentary: The role of criterion shift in false memory.Psychological Review,106, 398–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Neely, J. H. (1977). Semantic priming and retrieval from semantic memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limitedcapacity attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,106, 226–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L., &Schreiber, T. A. (1999).The University of South Florida word association, rhyme, and word fragment norms. Unpublished manuscript, University of South Florida, Tampa.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Nelson, D. L., Schreiber, T.A., &McEvoy, C. L. (1992). Processing implicit and explicit representations.Psychological Review,99, 322–348.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Norman, K. A., &Schacter, D. L. (1997). False recognition in younger and older adults: Exploring the characteristics of illusory memories.Memory & Cognition,25, 838–848.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Paivio, A., Yuille, J. C., & Madigan, S. A. (1968). Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns.Journal of Experimental Psychology Monographs76 (1, Pt. 2).

  47. Payne, D. G., Elie, C. J., Blackwell, J. M., &Neuschatz, J. S. (1996). Memory illusions: Recalling, recognizing, and recollecting events that never occurred.Journal of Memory & Language,35, 261–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Reyna, V. F., &Brainerd, C. J. (1995). Fuzzy-trace theory: An interim synthesis.Learning & Individual Differences,7, 1–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Roediger, H. L., III,Balota, D. A., &Watson, J. M. (2001). Spreading activation and the arousal of false memories. In H. L. Roediger III, J. S. Nairne, I. Neath, & A. M. Surprenant (Eds.),The nature of remembering: Essays in honor of Robert G. Crowder (pp. 95–115). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Roediger, H. L., III, &McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 803–814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Roediger, H. L., III, &McDermott, K. B. (1999). False alarms about false memories.Psychological Review,106, 406–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Roediger, H. L., III, &McDermott, K. B. (2000). Tricks of memory.Current Directions in Psychological Science,9, 123–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Roediger, H. L., III, McDermott, K. B., & Pisoni, D. B. (2001).Recollection of illusory voices. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  54. Roediger, H. L., III,McDermott, K. B., &Robinson, K. J. (1998). The role of associative processes in creating false memories. In M. A. Conway, S. E. Gathercole, & C. Cornoldi (Eds.),Theories of memory II (pp. 187–245). Hove, U.K.: Psychological Press.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Russell, W. A., &Jenkins, J. J. (1954).The complete Minnesota norms for responses to 100 words from the Kent-Rosanoff Word Association Test (Tech. Rep. No. 11, Contract N8 ONR 66216, Office of Naval Research). University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Schacter, D. L., Israel, L., &Racine, C. (1999). Suppressing false recognition in younger and older adults: The distinctiveness heuristic.Journal of Memory & Language,40, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Schacter, D. L., Verfaellie, M., &Pradere, D. (1996). The neuropsychology of memory illusions: False recall and recognition in amnesic patients.Journal of Memory & Language,35, 319–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Seamon, J. G., Luo, C. R., &Gallo, D. A. (1998). Creating false memories of words with or without recognition of list items: Evidence for nonconscious processes.Psychological Science,9, 20–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Smith, R. E., &Hunt, R. R. (1998). Presentation modality affects false memory.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,5, 710–715.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Stadler, M. A., Roediger, H. L., III, &McDermott, K. B. (1999). Norms for word lists that create false memories.Memory & Cognition,27, 494–500.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Thapar, A., &McDermott, K. B. (2001). False recall and false recognition induced by presentation of associated words: Effects of retention interval and level of processing.Memory & Cognition,29, 424–432.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Toglia, M. P., &Battig, W. F. (1978).Handbook of semantic word norms. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Toglia, M. P., Neuschatz, J. S., &Goodwin, K. A. (1999). Recall accuracy and illusory memories: When more is less.Memory,7, 233–256.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Tulving, E. (1974). Cue-dependent forgetting.American Scientist,62, 74–82.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Tulving, E. (1979). Relation between encoding specificity and levels of processing. In L. S. Cermak & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.),Levels of processing in human memory (pp. 405–428). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Tulving, E. (1985). Memory and consciousness.Canadian Psychologist,26, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Tun, P. A., Wingfield, A., Rosen, M. J., &Blanchard, L. (1998). Response latencies for false memories: Gist-based processes in normal aging.Psychology & Aging,13, 230–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Underwood, B. J. (1965). False recognition produced by implicit verbal responses.Journal of Experimental Psychology,70, 122–129.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Weldon, M. S. (1991). Mechanisms underlying priming on perceptual tests.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 526–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Wickens, T. D., &Hirshman, E. (2000). False memories and statistical decision theory: Comment on Miller and Wolford (1999) and Roediger and McDermott (1999).Psychological Review,107, 377–383.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Wixted, J. T., &Stretch, V. (2000). The case against a criterion-shift account of false memory.Psychological Review,107, 368–376.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Zechmeister, E. B. (1969). Orthographic distinctiveness.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,8, 754–761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Henry L. Roediger.

Additional information

This research was supported by a contract from the U.S. Office of Technical Services to H.L.R. and K.B.M., as well as NIMH Grant 1RO3 MH59034-01 to K.B.M.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roediger, H.L., Watson, J.M., McDermott, K.B. et al. Factors that determine false recall: A multiple regression analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 8, 385–407 (2001). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196177

Download citation

Keywords

  • False Memory
  • List Item
  • Associative Strength
  • False Recognition
  • Critical Item