Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

, Volume 8, Issue 3, pp 385–407 | Cite as

Factors that determine false recall: A multiple regression analysis

  • Henry L. RoedigerEmail author
  • Jason M. Watson
  • Kathleen B. McDermott
  • David A. Gallo


In the Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) paradigm, subjects study lists of words that are designed to elicit the recall of an associatively related critical item. The 55 lists we have developed provide levels of false recall ranging from .01 to .65, and understanding this variability should provide a key to understanding this memory illusion. Using a simultaneous multiple regression analysis, we assessed the contribution of seven factors in creating false recall of critical items in the DRM paradigm. This analysis accounted for approximately 68% of the variance in false recall, with two main predictors: associative connections from the study words to the critical item (r+.73; semipartialr+.60) and recallability of the lists (r+.43; semipartialr-.34). Taken together, the variance in false recall captured by these predictors accounted for 84% of the variance that can be explained, given the reliability of the false recall measures (r=.90). Therefore, the results of this analysis strongly constrain theories of false memory in this paradigm, suggesting that at least two factors determine the propensity of DRM lists to elicit false recall. The results fit well within the theoretical framework postulating that both semantic activation of the critical item and strategic monitoring processes influence the probability of false recall and false recognition in this paradigm.


False Memory List Item Associative Strength False Recognition Critical Item 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Anderson, J. R. (1972). FRAN: A simulation model of free recall. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 5, pp. 315–378). New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, J. R. (1983).The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, J. R., &Pirolli, P. L. (1984). Spread of activation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,10, 791–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Balota, D. A., Cortese, M. J., Duchek, J. M., Adams, D., Roediger, H. L., III,McDermott, K. B., &Yerys, B. E. (1999). Veridical and false memories in healthy older adults and in dementia of the Alzheimers type.Cognitive Neuropsychology,16, 361–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Balota, D. A., Dolan, P. O., &Duchek, J. M. (2000). Memory changes in healthy older adults. In E. Tulving & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.),The Oxford handbook of memory (pp. 395–409). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Balota, D. A., &Duchek, J. M. (1988). Age-related differences in lexical access, spreading activation, and simple pronunciation.Psychology and Aging,3, 84–93.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Balota, D. A. &Duchek, J. (1991). Semantic priming effects, lexical repetition effects, and contextual disambiguation effects in healthy aged individuals and individuals with senile dementia of the Alzheimer type.Brain & Language,40, 181–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bartlett, F. C. (1932).Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Brainerd, C. J., Wright, R., Reyna, V. F., &Mojardin, A. H. (2001). Conjoint recognition and phantom recollection.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,27, 307–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bruce, D., &Winograd, E. (1998). Remembering Deese’s 1959 articles: The Zeitgeist, the sociology of science, and false memories.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,5, 615–624.Google Scholar
  11. Bruner, J. S. (1957). On perceptual readiness.Psychological Review,64, 123–152.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Budson, A. E., Daffner, K. R., Desikan, R., &Schacter, D. L. (2000). When false recognition is unopposed by true recognition: Gist-based memory distortion in Alzheimer’s disease.Neuropsychology,14, 277–287.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Collins, A. M., &Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic memory.Psychological Review,82, 407–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J. T., &Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dormic (Ed.),Attention and performance VI (pp. 535–555). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  15. Deese, J. (1959a). Influence of interitem associative strength upon immediate free recall.Psychological Reports,5, 235–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Deese, J. (1959b). On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology,58, 17–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Deese, J. (1961). Associative structure and the serial reproduction experiment.Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology,63, 95–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Deese, J. (1965).The structure of associations in language and thought. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Gallo, D. A., McDermott, K. B., Percer, J. M., &Roediger, H. L., III. (2001). Modality effects in false recall and false recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,27, 339–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gallo, D. A., Roberts, M. J., &Seamon, J. G. (1997). Remembering words not presented in lists: Can we avoid creating false memories?Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,4, 271–276.Google Scholar
  21. Gallo, D. A., & Roediger, H. L., III (2001).Variability among word lists in evoking associative memory illusions. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  22. Gallo, D. A., Roediger, H. L., III, &McDermott, K. B. (2001). Associative false recognition occurs without strategic criterion shifts.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,8, 579–586.Google Scholar
  23. Hicks, J. L., &Marsh, R. L. (2001). False recognition occurs more frequently during source identification than during old-new recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,27, 375–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hunt, R. R., &Einstein, G. O. (1981). Relational and item-specific information in memory.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,19, 497–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hunt, R. R., &McDaniel, M. A. (1993). The enigma of organization and distinctiveness.Journal of Memory & Language,32, 421–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Israel, L., &Schacter, D. L. (1997). Pictorial encoding reduces false recognition of semantic associates.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,4, 577–581.Google Scholar
  27. Jacoby, L. L., Kelley, C. M., &Dywan, J. (1989). Memory attributions. In H. L. Roediger III & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.),Varieties of memory and consciousness: Essays in honour of Endel Tulving (pp. 391–422). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  28. Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., &Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring.Psychological Bulletin,114, 3–28.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Johnson, M. K., &Raye, C. L. (1981). Reality monitoring.Psychological Review,88, 67–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kellogg, R.T. (2001). Presentation modality and mode of recall in verbal false memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,27, 913–919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kirkpatrick, E. A. (1894). An experimental study of memory.Psychological Review,1, 602–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kučcera, H., &Francis, W. (1967).Computational analysis of presentday American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Marsh, E. J., McDermott, K. B., & Roediger, H. L., III (2001). Do retrieval factors play a role in the creation of of falsememories? Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  34. Mather, M., Henkel, L. A., &Johnson, M. J. (1997). Evaluating characteristics of false memories: Remember/know judgments and memory characteristics questionnaire compared.Memory & Cognition,25, 826–837.Google Scholar
  35. McDermott, K. B. (1996). The persistence of false memories in list recall.Journal of Memory & Language,35, 212–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. McDermott, K. B. (1997). Priming on perceptual implicit memory tests can be achieved through presentation of associates.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,4, 582–586.Google Scholar
  37. McDermott, K. B., &Roediger, H. L., III (1998). Attempting to avoid illusory memories: Robust false recognition of associates persists under conditions of explicit warnings and immediate testing.Journal of Memory & Language,39, 508–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McDermott, K. B., &Watson, J. M. (2001). The rise and fall of false recall: The impact of presentation duration.Journal of Memory & Language,45, 160–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. McEvoy, C. L., Nelson, D. L., &Komatsu, T. (1999). What is the connection between true and false memories? The differential roles of interitem associations in recall and recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,25, 1177–1194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Meyer, D. E., &Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1971). Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: Evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations.Journal of Experimental Psychology,90, 227–234.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Miller, M. B., &Wolford, G. L. (1999). Theoretical commentary: The role of criterion shift in false memory.Psychological Review,106, 398–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Neely, J. H. (1977). Semantic priming and retrieval from semantic memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limitedcapacity attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,106, 226–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L., &Schreiber, T. A. (1999).The University of South Florida word association, rhyme, and word fragment norms. Unpublished manuscript, University of South Florida, Tampa.Google Scholar
  44. Nelson, D. L., Schreiber, T.A., &McEvoy, C. L. (1992). Processing implicit and explicit representations.Psychological Review,99, 322–348.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Norman, K. A., &Schacter, D. L. (1997). False recognition in younger and older adults: Exploring the characteristics of illusory memories.Memory & Cognition,25, 838–848.Google Scholar
  46. Paivio, A., Yuille, J. C., & Madigan, S. A. (1968). Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns.Journal of Experimental Psychology Monographs76 (1, Pt. 2).Google Scholar
  47. Payne, D. G., Elie, C. J., Blackwell, J. M., &Neuschatz, J. S. (1996). Memory illusions: Recalling, recognizing, and recollecting events that never occurred.Journal of Memory & Language,35, 261–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Reyna, V. F., &Brainerd, C. J. (1995). Fuzzy-trace theory: An interim synthesis.Learning & Individual Differences,7, 1–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Roediger, H. L., III,Balota, D. A., &Watson, J. M. (2001). Spreading activation and the arousal of false memories. In H. L. Roediger III, J. S. Nairne, I. Neath, & A. M. Surprenant (Eds.),The nature of remembering: Essays in honor of Robert G. Crowder (pp. 95–115). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Roediger, H. L., III, &McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 803–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Roediger, H. L., III, &McDermott, K. B. (1999). False alarms about false memories.Psychological Review,106, 406–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Roediger, H. L., III, &McDermott, K. B. (2000). Tricks of memory.Current Directions in Psychological Science,9, 123–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Roediger, H. L., III, McDermott, K. B., & Pisoni, D. B. (2001).Recollection of illusory voices. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  54. Roediger, H. L., III,McDermott, K. B., &Robinson, K. J. (1998). The role of associative processes in creating false memories. In M. A. Conway, S. E. Gathercole, & C. Cornoldi (Eds.),Theories of memory II (pp. 187–245). Hove, U.K.: Psychological Press.Google Scholar
  55. Russell, W. A., &Jenkins, J. J. (1954).The complete Minnesota norms for responses to 100 words from the Kent-Rosanoff Word Association Test (Tech. Rep. No. 11, Contract N8 ONR 66216, Office of Naval Research). University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
  56. Schacter, D. L., Israel, L., &Racine, C. (1999). Suppressing false recognition in younger and older adults: The distinctiveness heuristic.Journal of Memory & Language,40, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Schacter, D. L., Verfaellie, M., &Pradere, D. (1996). The neuropsychology of memory illusions: False recall and recognition in amnesic patients.Journal of Memory & Language,35, 319–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Seamon, J. G., Luo, C. R., &Gallo, D. A. (1998). Creating false memories of words with or without recognition of list items: Evidence for nonconscious processes.Psychological Science,9, 20–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Smith, R. E., &Hunt, R. R. (1998). Presentation modality affects false memory.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,5, 710–715.Google Scholar
  60. Stadler, M. A., Roediger, H. L., III, &McDermott, K. B. (1999). Norms for word lists that create false memories.Memory & Cognition,27, 494–500.Google Scholar
  61. Thapar, A., &McDermott, K. B. (2001). False recall and false recognition induced by presentation of associated words: Effects of retention interval and level of processing.Memory & Cognition,29, 424–432.Google Scholar
  62. Toglia, M. P., &Battig, W. F. (1978).Handbook of semantic word norms. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  63. Toglia, M. P., Neuschatz, J. S., &Goodwin, K. A. (1999). Recall accuracy and illusory memories: When more is less.Memory,7, 233–256.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Tulving, E. (1974). Cue-dependent forgetting.American Scientist,62, 74–82.Google Scholar
  65. Tulving, E. (1979). Relation between encoding specificity and levels of processing. In L. S. Cermak & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.),Levels of processing in human memory (pp. 405–428). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  66. Tulving, E. (1985). Memory and consciousness.Canadian Psychologist,26, 1–12.Google Scholar
  67. Tun, P. A., Wingfield, A., Rosen, M. J., &Blanchard, L. (1998). Response latencies for false memories: Gist-based processes in normal aging.Psychology & Aging,13, 230–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Underwood, B. J. (1965). False recognition produced by implicit verbal responses.Journal of Experimental Psychology,70, 122–129.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Weldon, M. S. (1991). Mechanisms underlying priming on perceptual tests.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 526–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Wickens, T. D., &Hirshman, E. (2000). False memories and statistical decision theory: Comment on Miller and Wolford (1999) and Roediger and McDermott (1999).Psychological Review,107, 377–383.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Wixted, J. T., &Stretch, V. (2000). The case against a criterion-shift account of false memory.Psychological Review,107, 368–376.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Zechmeister, E. B. (1969). Orthographic distinctiveness.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,8, 754–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Henry L. Roediger
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jason M. Watson
    • 1
  • Kathleen B. McDermott
    • 1
  • David A. Gallo
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyWashington UniversitySt. Louis

Personalised recommendations