Social contagion of memory

Abstract

We report a new paradigm for studying false memories implanted by social influence, a process we call the social contagion of memory. A subject and confederate together saw six common household scenes (e.g., a kitchen) containing many objects, for either 15 or 60 sec. During a collaborative recall test, the 2 subjects each recalled six items from the scenes, but the confederate occasionally made mistakes by reporting items not from the scene. Some intrusions were highly consistent with the scene schema (e.g., a toaster) while others were less so (e.g., oven mitts). After a brief delay, the individual subject tried to recall as many items as possible from the six scenes. Recall of the erroneous items suggested by the confederate was greater than in a control condition (with no suggestion). Further, this social contagion effect was greater when the scenes were presented for less time (15 sec) and when the intruded item was more schema consistent (e.g., the toaster). As with other forms of social influence, false memories are contagious; one person’s memory can be infected by another person’s errors.

References

  1. Asch, S. E. (1952).Social psychology. New York: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Asch, S. E. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity: A minority of one against a unanimous majority.Psychological Monographs, 70 (Whole No. 416).

  3. Bartlett, F.C. (1932).Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Basden, B. H., Basden, D. R., Bryner, S., &Thomas, R. L., III (1997). A comparison of group and individual remembering: Does collaboration disrupt retrieval strategies?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 1176–1191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Basden, D.R., Reysen, M., & Basden, B. H. (1998, November). False memory in perceived groups. Poster presented at the 39th annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Dallas.

  6. Betz, A. L., Skowronski, J. J., &Ostrom, T.M. (1996). Shared realities: Social influence and stimulus memory.Social Cognition,14, 113–140.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Binet, A. (1900).La suggestibilité. Paris: Schleicher Frères.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bond, R., &Smith, P. (1996). Culture and conformity: A meta-analysis of studies using Asch’s (1952b, 1956) line judgment task.Psychological Bulletin,119, 111–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Brewer, W. F., &Treyens, J. C. (1981). Role of schemata in memory for places.Cognitive Psychology,13, 207–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dodd, D.H., &Bradshaw, J.M. (1980). Leading questions and memory: Pragmatic constraints.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,19, 695–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gardiner, J. M. (1988). Functional aspects of recollective experience.Memory & Cognition,16, 309–313.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jacoby, L. L, Hessels, S., &Bopp, K. (2001). Proactive and retroactive effects in memory performance. In H. L. Roediger III, J. S. Nairne, I. Neath, & A.M. Surprenant (Eds.),The nature of remembering: Essays in honor of Robert G. Crowder (pp. 35–54). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jacoby, L. L., Kelley, C. M., &Dywan, J. (1989). Memory attributions. In H. L. Roediger III, & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.),Varieties of memory and consciousness: Essays in honour of Endel Tulving (pp. 391–422). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jacoby, L. L., Yonelinas, A. P., &Jennings, J. M. (1997). The relation between conscious and unconscious (automatic) influences: A declaration of independence. In J. D. Cohen & J. W. Schooler (Eds.),Scientific approaches to consciousness (pp. 13–47). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., &Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring.Psychological Bulletin, 114, 3–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Johnson, M. K., &Raye, C. L. (1998). False memories and confabulation.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,2, 137–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lindsay, D. S., &Johnson, M. K. (1989). The eyewitness suggestibility effect and memory for source.Memory & Cognition,17, 349–358.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Loftus, E. F. (1979). Reactions to blatantly contradictory information.Memory & Cognition,7, 368–374.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Loftus, E. F. (1993). Made in memory: Distortions in memory after misleading communications. In D. L. Medin (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 30, pp. 187–215). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Loftus, E. F., Miller, D. G., &Burns, H. J. (1978). Semantic integration of verbal information into visual memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,4, 19–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Loftus, E. F., &Palmer, J. C. (1974). Reconstruction of automobile destruction: An example of the interaction between language and memory.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,13, 585–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mack, J. E. (1994).Alien abduction: Human encounters with aliens. New York: Scribner’s.

    Google Scholar 

  23. McDermott, K. B., & Watson, J. M. (in press). The rise and fall of false recall: The impact of presentation duration. Journal of Memory & Language.

  24. Meade, M. L., & Roediger, H. L., III (2000).Explorations in the social contagion of memory. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  25. Melton, A. W., &Irwin, J. M. (1940). The influence of interpolated learning on retroactive inhibition and the overt transfer of specific responses.American Journal of Psychology,53, 175–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Miller, M. B., &Gazzaniga, M. S. (1998). Creating false memories for visual scenes.Neuropsychologia,36, 513–520.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Multhaup, K. S. (1995). Aging, source, and decision criteria: When false fame errors do and do not occur.Psychology & Aging,10, 492–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ofshe, R., &Watters, E. (1994).Making monsters: False memories, psychotherapy, and sexual hysteria. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons/Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Pendergrast, M. (1996).Victims of memory: Sex abuse accusations and shattered lives. Hinesburg, VT: Upper Access.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Rajaram, S. (1993). Remembering and knowing: Two means of access to the personal past.Memory & Cognition,21, 89–102.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Roediger, H. L., III,Jacoby, D., &McDermott, K. B. (1996). Misinformation effects in recall: Creating false memories through repeated retrieval.Journal of Memory & Language,35, 300–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Roediger, H. L., III, &McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 803–814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Schneider, D. M., &Watkins, M. J. (1996). Response conformity in recognition testing.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,3, 481–485.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Smith, V. L., &Ellsworth, P. C. (1987). The social psychology of eyewitness accuracy: Misleading questions and communicator expertise.Journal of Applied Psychology,72, 294–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Tulving, E. (1985). Memory and consciousness.Canadian Psychologist,26, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Underwood, J., &Pezdek, K. (1998). Memory suggestibility as an example of the sleeper effect.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,5, 449–453.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Weldon, M. S. (2000). Remembering as a social process. In D. L. Medin (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 40, pp. 67–120). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Weldon, M. S., &Bellinger, K. D. (1997). Collective memory: Collaborative and individual processes in remembering.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 1160–1175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Weldon, M. S., Blair, C., &Huebsch, P. D. (2000). Group remembering: Does social loafing underlie collaborative inhibition?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 1568–1577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Wells, G. L., Lindsay, R. C. L., &Ferguson, T. J. (1979). Accuracy, confidence, and juror perceptions in eyewitness identification.Journal of Applied Psychology,64, 440–448.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Zaragoza, M. S., &Mitchell, K. J. (1996). Repeated exposure to suggestion and the creation of false memories.Psychological Science,7, 294–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Henry L. Roediger.

Additional information

This research was supported by the U.S. Office of Technical Services in a contract with H.L.R. The data reported were presented at the meeting of the Psychonomic Society in November 1999. We appreciate comments of David Balota, Larry Jacoby, Alan Lambert, Kathleen Mc-Dermott, and Mary Sue Weldon on this research.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roediger, H.L., Meade, M.L. & Bergman, E.T. Social contagion of memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 8, 365–371 (2001). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196174

Download citation

Keywords

  • Social Influence
  • False Memory
  • Recall Test
  • Contagion Item
  • Social Contagion