Wood and Cowan (1995) replicated and extended Moray’s (1959) investigation of thecocktail party phenomenon, which refers to a situation in which one can attend to only part of a noisy environment, yet highly pertinent stimuli such as one’s own name can suddenly capture attention. Both of these previous investigations have shown that approximately 33% of subjects report hearing their own name in an unattended, irrelevant message. Here we show that subjects who detect their name in the irrelevant message have relatively low working-memory capacities, suggesting that they have difficulty blocking out, or inhibiting, distracting information.
Baddeley, A. D., &Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 8, pp. 47–89). New York: Academic Press.
Broadbent, D. E. (1958).Perception and communication. New York: Pergamon.
Cherry, E. C. (1953). Some experiments on the recognition of speech, with one and with two ears.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,25, 975–979.
Conway, A. R. A., Cowan, N., Bunting, M. F., Therriault, D. J., & Minkoff, S. R. B. (in press). A latent variable analysis of working memory capacity, short-term memory capacity, processing speed, and general fluid intelligence.Intelligence.
Csconway, A. R. A., &Engle, R. W. (1994). Working memory and retrieval: A resource-dependent inhibition model.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,123, 354–373.
Conway, A. R. A., Tuholski, S. W., Shisler, R. J., &Engle, R. W. (1999). The effect of memory load on negative priming: An individual differences investigation.Memory & Cognition,27, 1042–1050.
Daneman, M., &Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,19, 450–466.
Daneman, M., &Merikle, P. M. (1996). Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,3, 422–433.
Dempster, F. N. (1991). Inhibitory processes: A neglected dimension of intelligence.Intelligence,15, 157–173.
Engle, R. W., Tuholski, S. W., Laughlin, J. E., &Conway, A. R. A. (1999). Working memory, short-term memory and general fluid intelligence: A latent variable approach.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,128, 309–331.
Gernsbacher, M. A. (1993). Less skilled readers have less efficient suppression mechanisms.Psychological Science,4, 294–298.
Gilhooly, K. J., Logie, R. H., Wetherick, N. E., &Wynn, V. (1993). Working memory and strategies in syllogistic-reasoning tasks.Memory & Cognition,21, 115–124.
Hasher, L., &Zacks, R. T. (1988). Working memory, comprehension, and aging: A review and a new view. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 22, pp. 193–225). San Diego: Academic Press.
Kane, M. J., &Engle, R. W. (2000). Working-memory capacity, proactive interference, and divided attention: Limits on long-term memory retrieval.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 336–358.
Kyllonen, P. C. (1996). Is working memory capacity Spearman’s g? In I. Dennis & P. Tapsfield (Eds.),Human abilities: Their nature and measurement (pp. 49–75). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Lachman, R., Lachman, J. L., &Butterfield, E. C. (1979).Cognitive psychology and information processing: An introduction. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Miyake, A., &Shah, P. (1999).Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Moray, N. (1959). Attention in dichotic listening: Affective cues and the influence of instructions.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,11, 56–60.
Rosen, V. M., &Engle, R. W. (1997). The role of working memory capacity in retrieval.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,126, 211–227.
Rosen, V. M., &Engle, R. W. (1998). Working memory capacity and suppression.Journal of Memory & Language,39, 418–436.
Toms, M., Morris, N., &Ward, D. (1993). Working memory and conditional reasoning.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,46A, 679–699.
Turner, M. L., &Engle, R. W. (1989). Is working memory capacity task dependent?Journal of Memory & Language,28, 127–154.
Wood, N. L., &Cowan, N. (1995). The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: Attention and memory in the classic selective listening procedure of Cherry (1953).Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 255–260.
This work was supported by NIH Grant R01 HD-21338.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Conway, A.R.A., Cowan, N. & Bunting, M.F. The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: The importance of working memory capacity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 8, 331–335 (2001). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196169
- Work Memory Capacity
- Negative Priming
- Dichotic Listening
- Cocktail Party
- Selective Attention Task