Environmental context-dependent memory: A review and meta-analysis

Abstract

To address questions about human memory’s dependence on the coincidental environmental contexts in which events occur, we review studies of incidental environmental context-dependent memory in humans and report a meta-analysis. Our theoretical approach to the issue stems from Glenberg’s (1997) contention that introspective thought (e.g., remembering, conceptualizing) requires cognitive resources normally used to represent the immediate environment. We propose that if tasks encourage processing of noncontextual information (i.e., introspective thought) at input and/or at test, then both learning and memory will be less dependent on the ambient environmental contexts in which those activities occur. The meta-analysis showed that across all studies, environmental context effects were reliable, and furthermore, that the use of noncontextual cues during learning (overshadowing) and at test (outshining), as well as mental reinstatement of appropriate context cues at test, all reduce the effect of environmental manipulations. We conclude that environmental context-dependent memory effects are less likely to occur under conditions in which the immediate environment is likely to be suppressed.

References

  1. Balsam, P. D., &Tomie, A. (Eds.) (1985).Context and learning. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bilodeau, I. M., &Schlosberg, H. (1951). Similarity in stimulating conditions as a variable in retroactive inhibition.Journal of Experimental Psychology,41, 199–204.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bjork, R. A., &Richardson-Klavehn, A. (1988). On the puzzling relationship between environmental context and human memory. In C. Izawa (Ed.),Current issues in cognitive processes: The Tulane Flowerree Symposium on Cognition (pp. 313–344). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Blaney, P. H. (1986). Affect and memory: A review.Psychological Bulletin,99, 229–246.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Blaxton, T. A. (1989). Investigating dissociations among memory measures: Support for a transfer-appropriate processing framework.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 657–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Block, R. A. (1982). Temporal judgments and contextual change.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,8, 530–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bower, G. H. (1972). Stimulus-sampling theory of encoding variability. In A. W. Melton & E. Martin (Eds.),Coding processes in human memory (pp. 85–123). Washington, DC: Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bower, G. H., &Cohen, P. R. (1982). Emotional influences in memory and thinking: Data and theory. In M. S. Clark & S. T. Fiske (Eds.),Affect and cognition (pp. 263–289). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cann, A., &Ross, D. A. (1989). Olfactory stimuli as context cues in human memory.American Journal of Psychology,102, 91–102.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Carr, H. A. (1925).A study of mental activity. New York: Longmans, Green.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chalfonte, B. L., &Johnson, M. K. (1996). Feature memory and binding in young and older adults.Memory & Cognition,24, 403–416.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chappell, M., &Humphreys, M. S. (1994). An auto-associative neural network for sparse representations: Analysis and application to models of recognition and cued recall.Psychological Review,101, 103–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cohen, J. (1977).Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cousins, R., &Hanley, R. (1996). The effect of environmental context on recall and category clustering scores following relational and individual item processing: A test of the outshining hypothesis.Memory,4, 79–90.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dallett, K., &Wilcox, S. G. (1968). Contextual stimuli and proactive inhibition.Journal of Experimental Psychology,78, 475–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dalton, P. (1993). The role of stimulus familiarity in context-dependent recognition.Memory & Cognition,21, 223–234.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dulsky, S. G. (1935). The effect of a change of background on recall and relearning.Journal of Experimental Psychology,18, 725–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Eckert, E., Kanak, N. J., &Stevens, R. (1984). Memory for fre quency as a function of environmental context.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,22, 507–510.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Eich, [J.] E. (1985). Context, memory, and integrated item/context imagery.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,11, 764–770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Eich, [J.] E. (1989). Theoretical issues in state dependent memory. In H. L. Roediger III and F. I. M. Craik (Eds.),Varieties of memory and consciousness: Essays in honour of Endel Tulving (pp. 331–354). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Eich, [J.] E. (1995). Mood as a mediator of place dependent memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,124, 293–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Eich, J. M. (1982). A composite holographic associative recall model.Psychological Review,89, 627–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Farnsworth, P. R. (1934). Examinations in familiar and unfamiliar surroundings.Journal of Social Psychology,5, 128–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Fernandez, A., &Glenberg, A. M. (1985). Changing environmental context does not reliably affect memory.Memory & Cognition,13, 333–345.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Geiselman, R. E., &Bjork, R. A. (1980). Primary versus secondary rehearsal in imagined voices: Differential effects on recognition.Cognitive Psychology,12, 188–205.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Geiselman, R. E., &Glenny, J. (1977). Effects of imagining speakers’ voices on the retention of words presented visually.Memory & Cognition,5, 499–504.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Glenberg, A. M. (1979). Component-levels theory of the effects of spacing of repetitions on recall and recognition.Memory & Cognition,7, 95–112.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Glenberg, A. M. (1997). What memory is for.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,20, 1–55.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Glenberg, A. M., Schroeder, J. L., &Robertson, D. A. (1998). Averting the gaze disengages the environment and facilitates remembering.Memory & Cognition,26, 651–658.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Godden, D. R., &Baddeley, A. D. (1975). Context-dependent memory in two natural environments: Land and underwater.British Journal of Psychology,66, 325–331.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Godden, D. R., &Baddeley, A. D. (1980). When does context influence recognition memory?British Journal of Psychology,71, 99–104.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Greenspoon, J., &Ranyard, R. (1957). Stimulus conditions and retroactive inhibition.Journal of Experimental Psychology,53, 55–59.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Hedges, L. V., &Olkin, I. (1985).Statistical methods for meta-analysis. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Hintzman, D. L. (1988). Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model.Psychological Review,95, 528–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Humphreys, M. S., Bain, J. D., &Pike, R. (1989). Different ways to cue a coherent memory system: A theory for episodic, semantic, and procedural tasks.Psychological Review,96, 208–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Jacoby, L. L. (1983). Perceptual enhancement: Persistent effects of an experience.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,9, 21–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., &Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring.Psychological Bulletin,114, 3–28.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Kolers, P. A., &Roediger, H. L., III (1984). Procedures of mind.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,23, 425–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Krafka, C., &Penrod, S. (1985). Reinstatement of context in a field experiment on eyewitness identification.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,49, 58–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Malpass, R. S., &Devine, P. G. (1981). Guided memory in eyewitness identification.Journal of Applied Psychology,66, 343–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Matzel, L. D., Schachtman, T. R., &Miller, R. R. (1985). Recovery of an overshadowed association achieved by extinction of the overshadowing stimulus.Learning & Motivation,16, 398–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Mazur, J. E. (1986).Learning and behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  43. McGeoch, J. A. (1942).The psychology of human learning. New York: Longmans.

    Google Scholar 

  44. McSpadden, M., Schooler, J. W., &Loftus, E. F. (1988). Here today, gone tomorrow: The appearance and disappearance of context effects. In D. M. Thomson & G. M. Davies (Eds.),Memory in context: Context in memory (pp. 215–230). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Morris, C. D., Bransford, J. D., &Franks, J. J. (1977). Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,16, 519–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Murdock, B. B. (1997). Context and mediators in a theory of distributed associative memory (TODAM2).Psychological Review,104, 839–862.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Murnane, K., &Phelps, M. P. (1993). A global activation approach to the effect of changes in environmental context on recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 882–894.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Murnane, K., &Phelps, M. P. (1994). When does a different environmental context make a difference in recognition? A global activation model.Memory & Cognition,22, 584–590.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Murnane, K., &Phelps, M. P. (1995). Effects of changes in relative cue strength on context-dependent recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 158–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Pan, S. (1926). The influence of contextual conditions upon learning and recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology,9, 468–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Pessin, J. (1932). The effect of similar and dissimilar conditions upon learning and relearning.Journal of Experimental Psychology,15, 427–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Raaijmakers, J. G., &Shiffrin, R. M. (1981). Search of associative memory.Psychological Review,88, 93–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Rand, G., &Wapner, S. (1967). Postural status as a factor in memory.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,6, 268–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Reed, H. J. (1931). The influence of a change of conditions upon the amount recalled.Journal of Experimental Psychology,14, 632–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Saufley, W. H., Jr.,Otaka, S. R., &Bavaresco, J. L. (1985). Context effects: Classroom tests and contextual independence.Memory & Cognition,13, 522–528.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Smith, S. M. (1979). Remembering in and out of context.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,5, 460–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Smith, S. M. (1982). Enhancement of recall using multiple environmental contexts during learning.Memory & Cognition,10, 405–412.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Smith, S. M. (1984). A comparison of two techniques for reducing context-dependent forgetting.Memory & Cognition,12, 477–482.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Smith, S. M. (1985). Environmental context and recognition memory reconsidered.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,23, 173–176.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Smith, S. M. (1986). Environmental context-dependent recognition memory using a short-term memory task for input.Memory & Cognition,14, 347–354.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Smith, S. M. (1988). Environmental context-dependent memory. In D. M. Thomson & G. M. Davies (Eds.),Memory in context: Context in memory (pp. 13–34). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Smith, S. M. (1994). Theoretical principles of context-dependent memory. In P. Morris & M. Gruneberg (Eds.),Theoretical aspects of memory (Aspects of Memory, 2nd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 168–195). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Smith, S. M. (1995). Mood is a component of mental context: Comment on Eich (1995).Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,124, 309–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Smith, S. M., Glenberg, A. [M.], &Bjork, R.A. (1978). Environmental context and human memory.Memory & Cognition,6, 342–353.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Smith, S. M., Heath, F. R., &Vela, E. (1990). Environmental context-dependent homophone spelling.American Journal of Psychology,103, 229–242.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Smith, S. M., &Sinha, A. K. (1987).Effect of brief immersion in a flotation tank on memory and cognition (Tech. Rep. No. CSCS-004). College Station, TX: Texas A&M University, Committee for the Study of Cognitive Science.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Smith, S. M., & Vela, E. (1986, November).Outshining: The relative effectiveness of cues. Paper presented at the 27th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, New Orleans.

  68. Smith, S. M., &Vela, E. (1992). Environmental context-dependent eyewitness recognition.Applied Cognitive Psychology,6, 125–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Smith, S. M., Vela, E., &Williamson, J. E. (1988). Shallow input processing does not induce environmental context-dependent recognition.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,26, 537–540.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Strand, B. Z. (1970). Change of context and retroactive inhibition.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,9, 202–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Tulving, E. (1983).Elements of episodic memory. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Tulving, E., &Thomson, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory.Psychological Review,80, 359–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Ucros, C. G. (1989). Mood state-dependent memory: A meta-analysis.Cognition & Emotion,3, 139–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Weiss, W., &Margolius, G. (1954). The effect of context stimuli on learning and retention.Journal of Experimental Psychology,48, 318–322.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Wright, D. L., &Shea, C. H. (1991). Contextual dependencies in motor skills.Memory & Cognition,19, 361–370.

    Google Scholar 

References for the meta-analysis

  1. Bell, P. A., Hess, S., Hill, E., Kukas, S. L., Richards, R.W., &Sargent, D. (1984). Noise and context-dependent memory.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,22, 99–100.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bilodeau, I. M., &Schlosberg, H. (1951). Similarity in stimulating conditions as a variable in retroactive inhibition.Journal of Experimental Psychology,41, 199–204.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Canas, J. J., &Nelson, D. L. (1986). Recognition and environmental context: The effect of testing by phone.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,24, 407–409.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cohen, R. L., Peterson, M., Mantini-Atkinson, T. (1987). Inter-event differences in event memory: Why are some events more recallable than others?Memory & Cognition,15, 109–118.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cousins, R., &Hanley, R. (1996). The effect of environmental context on recall and category clustering scores following relational and individual item processing: A test of the outshining hypothesis.Memory,4, 79–90.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cutler, B. L., Penrod, S. D., &Martens, T. K. (1987). Improving the reliability of eyewitness identification: Putting context into context.Journal of Applied Psychology,72, 629–637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dallett, K., &Wilcox, S. G. (1968). Contextual stimuli and proactive inhibition.Journal of Experimental Psychology,78, 475–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dalton, P. (1993). The role of stimulus familiarity in context-dependent recognition.Memory & Cognition,21, 223–234.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Devane, J. R., &Parkman, R. A. (1978). Effects of imagery instructions when the context is changed.Perceptual & Motor Skills,46, 716–718.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dolinsky, R., &Zabrucky, K. (1983). Effects of environmental context changes on memory.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,21, 423–426.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Eich, [J.] E. (1985). Context, memory, and integrated item/context imagery.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,11, 764–770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Eich, [J.] E. (1995). Mood as a mediator of place dependent memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,124, 293–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Emmerson, P. G. (1986). Effects of environmental context on recognition in an unusual environment.Perceptual & Motor Skills,63, 1047–1050.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fernandez, A., &Glenberg, A. M. (1985). Changing environmental context does not reliably affect memory.Memory & Cognition,13, 333–345.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fisher, R. P., Geiselman, R. E., MacKinnon, D. P., &Holland, H. L. (1984). Hypnotic and cognitive interviews to enhance the memory of eyewitnesses to crime.International Journal of Investigative & Forensic Hypnosis,7, 28–31.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Glenberg, A. M. (1979). Component-levels theory of the effects of spacing of repetitions on recall and recognition.Memory & Cognition,7, 95–112.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Godden, D. R., &Baddeley, A. D. (1975). Context-dependent memory in two natural environments: Land and underwater.British Journal of Psychology,66, 325–331.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Godden, D. R., &Baddeley, A. D. (1980). When does context influence recognition memory?British Journal of Psychology,71, 99–104.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Greenspoon, J., &Ranyard, R. (1957). Stimulus conditions and retroactive inhibition.Journal of Experimental Psychology,53, 55–59.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Humphreys, M. S., Pike, R., Bain, J. D., &Tehan, G. (1988). Using multilist designs to test for contextual reinstatement effects in recognition.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,26, 200–202.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jacoby, L. L. (1983). Perceptual enhancement: Persistent effects of an experience.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,9, 21–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jensen, L. [C.], Dibble, J., &Anderson, D. C. (1971). Effects of a contextual change upon retroactive inhibition.Psychological Reports,29, 39–46.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Jensen, L. C., Harris, K., &Anderson, D. C. (1971). Retention following a change in ambient contextual stimuli for six age groups.Developmental Psychology,4, 394–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Krafka, C., &Penrod, S. (1985). Reinstatement of context in a field experiment on eyewitness identification.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,49, 58–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Malpass, R. S., &Devine, P. G. (1981). Guided memory in eyewitness identification.Journal of Applied Psychology,66, 343–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. McDaniel, M. A., &Anderson, C. D., Einstein, G. O., &O’Halloran, C. M. (1988). Modulation of environmental reinstatement effects through encoding strategies.American Journal of Psychology,102, 523–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. McSpadden, M., Schooler, J. W., &Loftus, E. F. (1988). Here today, gone tomorrow: The appearance and disappearance of context effects. In D. M. Thomson & G. M. Davies (Eds.),Memory in context: Context in memory (pp. 215–230). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Nagge, J. W. (1935). An experimental test of the theory of associative interference.Journal of Experimental Psychology,18, 663–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Nixon, S. J., &Kanak, N. J. (1981). The interactive effects of instructional set and environmental context changes on the serial position effect.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,18, 237–240.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Sanders, G. L. (1984). Effects of context cues on eyewitness identification responses.Journal of Applied Social Psychology,14, 386–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Smith, S. M. (1979). Remembering in and out of context.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,5, 460–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Smith, S. M. (1982). Enhancement of recall using multiple environmental contexts during learning.Memory & Cognition,10, 405–412.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Smith, S. M. (1984). A comparison of two techniques for reducing context-dependent forgetting.Memory & Cognition,12, 477–482.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Smith, S. M. (1985a). Effects of number of study environments and learning instructions on free-recall clustering and accuracy.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,23, 440–442.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Smith, S. M. (1985b). Environmental context and recognition memory reconsidered.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,23, 173–176.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Smith, S. M. (1986). Environmental context-dependent recognition memory using a short-term memory task for input.Memory & Cognition,14, 347–354.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Smith, S. M., &Glenberg, A. [M.], &Bjork, R. A. (1978). Environmental context and human memory.Memory & Cognition,6, 342–353.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Smith, S. M., &Vela, E. (1992). Environmental context-dependent eyewitness recognition.Applied Cognitive Psychology,6, 125–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Smith, S. M., Vela, E., &Williamson, J. E. (1988). Shallow input processing does not induce environmental context-dependent recognition.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,26, 537–540.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Strand, B. Z. (1970). Change of context and retroactive inhibition.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,9, 202–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Wilhite, S. C. (1991). Evidence of a negative environmental reinstatement effect.British Journal of Psychology,82, 325–342.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven M. Smith.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smith, S.M., Vela, E. Environmental context-dependent memory: A review and meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 8, 203–220 (2001). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196157

Download citation

Keywords

  • Retention Interval
  • Context Effect
  • Memory Trace
  • Environmental Context
  • Eyewitness Identification