Advertisement

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

, Volume 8, Issue 1, pp 155–161 | Cite as

“If I had said it I would have remembered it: Reducing false memories with a distinctiveness heuristic

  • Chad S. Dodson
  • Daniel L. Schacter
Brief Reports

Abstract

We examined the contributions of decision processes to the rejection of false memories. In two experiments, people studied lists of semantically related words and then completed a recognition test containing studied words, unrelated lure words, and related lure words. People who said words aloud at study were less likely to falsely recognize related lures on the test than were those who heard words at study. We suggest that people who said words at study employed a distinctiveness heuristic during the test whereby they demanded access to distinctive say information in order to judge an item as old. Even when retrieving say information is not perfectly diagnostic of prior study, as in Experiment 2, in which participants both said and heard words at study, people persist in using the distinctiveness heuristic to reduce false memories.

Keywords

Recognition Rate Recognition Test False Memory Study List Related Word 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Anderson, R. E. (1984). Did I do it or did I only imagine doing it?Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,113, 594–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arndt, J., &Hirshman, E. (1998). True and false recognition in MINERVA2: Explanations from a global matching perspective.Journal of Memory & Language,39, 371–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Conway, M. A., &Gathercole, S. E. (1987). Modality and long-term memory.Journal of Memory & Language,26, 341–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Deese, J. (1959). On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology,58, 17–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Dodson, C. S., &Johnson, M. K. (1993). Rate of false source attributions depends on how questions are asked.American Journal of Psychology,106, 541–557.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Dodson, C. S., &Johnson, M. K. (1996). Some problems with the process dissociation approach to memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,125, 181–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Donaldson, W. (1992). Measuring recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,121, 275–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Foley, M. A., Johnson, M. K., &Raye, C. L. (1983). Age-related changes in confusion between memories for thoughts and memories for speech.Child Development,54, 51–60.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Gillund, G., &Shiffrin, R. M. (1984). A retrieval model for both recognition and recall.Psychological Review,91, 1–67.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Hashtroudi, S., Johnson, M. K., &Chrosniak, L. D. (1989). Aging and source monitoring.Psychology & Aging,4, 106–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hicks, J. L., &Marsh, R. L. (1999). Attempts to reduce the incidence of false recall with source monitoring.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,25, 1195–1209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hintzman, D. L. (1988). Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model.Psychological Review,95, 528–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Israel, L., &Schacter, D. L. (1997). Pictorial encoding reduces false recognition of semantic associates.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,4, 577–581.Google Scholar
  14. Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., &Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring.Psychological Bulletin,114, 3–28.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Johnson, M. K., &Raye, C. L. (1981). Reality monitoring.Psychological Review,88, 67–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Johnson, M. K., Raye, C. L., Foley, H. J., &Foley, M. A. (1981). Cognitive operations and decision bias in reality monitoring.American Journal of Psychology,94, 37–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Koutstaal, W., &Schacter, D. L. (1997). Gist-based false recognition of pictures in older and younger adults.Journal of Memory & Language,37, 555–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lindsay, D. S., &Johnson, M. K. (1989). The eyewitness suggestibility effect and memory for source.Memory & Cognition,17, 349–358.Google Scholar
  19. Marsh, R. L., &Hicks, J. L. (1998). Test formats change sourcemonitoring decision processes.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 1137–1151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mather, M., Henkel, L. A., &Johnson, M. K. (1997). Evaluating characteristics of false memories: Remember/know judgments and memory characteristics questionnaire compared.Memory & Cognition,25, 826–837.Google Scholar
  21. Miller, M. B., &Wolford, G. L. (1999). The role of criterion shift in false memory.Psychological Review,106, 398–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Multhaup, K. S. (1995). Aging, source, and decision criteria: When false fame errors do and do not occur.Psychology & Aging,10, 492–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Norman, K. A., &Schacter, D. L. (1997). False recognition in younger and older adults: Exploring the characteristics of illusory memories.Memory & Cognition,25, 838–848.Google Scholar
  24. Payne, D. G., Elie, C. J., Blackwell, J. M., &Neuschatz, J. S. (1996). Memory illusions: Recalling, recognizing, and recollecting events that never occurred.Journal of Memory & Language,35, 261–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Roediger, H. L., III, &McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 803–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Roediger, H. L., III, &McDermott, K. B. (1999). False alarms about false memories.Psychological Review,106, 406–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rotello, C. M. (1999). Metacognition and memory for nonoccurrence.Memory,7, 43–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Schacter, D. L., Israel, L., &Racine, C. A. (1999). Suppressing false recognition in younger and older adults: The distinctiveness heuristic.Journal of Memory & Language,40, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schacter, D. L., Norman, K. A., &Koutstaal, W. (1998). The cognitive neuroscience of constructive memory.Annual Review of Psychology,49, 289–318.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Schacter, D. L., Verfaellie, M., Anes, M. D., &Racine, C. (1998). When true recognition suppresses false recognition: Evidence from amnesic patients.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,10, 668–679.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Schacter, D. L., Verfaellie, M., &Pradere, D. (1996). The neuropsychology of memory illusions: False recall and recognition in amnesic patients.Journal of Memory & Language,35, 319–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Seamon, J. G., Luo, C. R., &Gallo, D. A. (1998). Creating false memories of words with or without recognition of list items: Evidence for nonconscious processes.Psychological Science,9, 20–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Smith, R.E., &Hunt, R. R. (1998). Presentation modality affects false memory.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,5, 710–715.Google Scholar
  34. Snodgrass, J. G., &Corwin, J. (1988). Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: Applications to dementia and amnesia.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,117, 34–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Strack, F., &Bless, H. (1994). Memory for nonoccurrences: Metacognitive and presuppositional strategies.Journal of Memory & Language,33, 203–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wixted, J. T., &Stretch, V. (2000). The case against a criterion-shift account of false memory.Psychological Review,107, 368–376.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyHarvard UniversityCambridge

Personalised recommendations