Constraints on definite article alternation in speech production: To “thee” or not to “thee”?
A recent study showed that the pronunciation of the definite article in English (as either a reduced “thuh” or an unreduced “thee”) depends on a number of different factors, including the pronunciation, spelling, and stress assignment of the following word (Raymond, Fisher, & Healy, 2002). However, it is not clear from previous research whether these factors influenced performance implicitly in normal speech production or whether explicit knowledge of the object of the experiment was relied on. In Experiment 1, we examined implicit performance on pronunciation of the definite article and found more systematic behavior than had previously been observed but, again, an influence of the pronunciation, spelling, and stress assignment of the following word. In Experiment 2, we tested the influence of the following word on definite article production during language development for two groups of children 8 and 10 years of age. This experiment showed increasing use of the unreduced form during development and a further influence of orthography. We interpret these results in terms of an interaction between perception and production in which the production system makes use of generalizations on the basis of both phonological and orthographic representations generated in perception.
- Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & van Rijn, H. (1993). The CELEX lexical database [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Linguistic Data Consortium.Google Scholar
- Bell, A., Jurafsky, D., Fosler -Lussier, E., Girand, C., & Gildea, D. (1999). Forms of English function words: Effects of disfluencies, turn position, age and sex, and predictability. InProceedings of the XIV International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 395–398). Berkeley: University of California, Linguistics Department.Google Scholar
- Godfrey, J., Holliman, E., & McDaniel, J. (1992). SWITCHBOARD: Telephone speech corpus for research and development. InIEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, & Signal Processing ’92 (pp. 517–520). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Press.Google Scholar
- Goswami, U., & Bryant, P. E. (1990).Phonological skills and learning to read. Hove, U. K.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Jakobson, R., Fant, G., & Halle, M. (1952).Preliminaries to speech analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Jurafsky, D., Bell, A., Fosle-Lussier, E., Girand, C., & Raymond, W. (1998). Reduction of English function words in Switchboard. In R. H. Mannell & J. Robert-Ribes (Eds.),Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (pp. 3111–3114). Sydney: Australian Speech Science and Technology Association.Google Scholar
- Kuÿcera, H., & Francis, W. N. (1967).Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.Google Scholar
- Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,22, 1–38.Google Scholar
- Selkirk, E. (1984).Phonology and syntax: The relation between sound and structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Serwatka, M., & Healy, A. F. (1998). On the status of the count-mass distinction in the mental grammar. In A. F. Healy & L. E. Bourne, Jr. (Eds.),Foreign language learning: Psycholinguistic studies on training and retention (pp. 113–158). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Todaka, Y. (1992). Phonetic variants of the determiner “the”.UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics,81, 39–47.Google Scholar