Abstract
The artificial grammar (AG) learning literature (see, e. g., Mathews et al., 1989; Reber, 1967) has relied heavily on a single measure of implicitly acquired knowledge. Recent work comparing this measure (string classification) with a more indirect measure in which participants makeliking ratings of novel stimuli (e. g., Manza & Bornstein, 1995; Newell & Bright, 2001) has shown that string classification (which we argue can be thought of as an explicit, rather than an implicit, measure of memory) gives rise to more explicit knowledge of the grammatical structure in learning strings and is more resilient to changes in surface features and processing between encoding and retrieval. We report data from two experiments that extend these findings. In Experiment 1, we showed that a divided attention manipulation (at retrieval) interfered with explicit retrieval of AG knowledge but did not interfere with implicit retrieval. In Experiment 2, we showed that forcing participants to respond within a very tight deadline resulted in the same asymmetric interference pattern between the tasks. In both experiments, we also showed that the type of information being retrieved influenced whether interference was observed. The results are discussed in terms of the relatively automatic nature of implicit retrieval and also with respect to the differences between analytic and nonanalytic processing (Whittlesea & Price, 2001).
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Baddeley, A., Lewis, V., Eldridge, M., & Thomson, N. (1984). Attention and retrieval from long term memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,113, 518–540.
Berry, D. C., Banbury, S., & Henry, L. (1997). Transfer across form and modality in implicit and explicit memory.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,50A, 1–24.
Bornstein, R. F. (1989). Exposure and affect: Overview and metaanalysis of research, 1968-1987.Psychological Bulletin,106, 265–289.
Bornstein, R. F., & D’Agostino, P. R. (1992). Stimulus recognition and the mere exposure effect.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,63, 545–552.
Butler, L. T., & Berry, D. C. (2001). Implicit memory: Intention and awareness revisited.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,5, 192–197.
Cleeremans, A., Destrebecqz, A., & Boyer, M. (1998). Implicit learning: News from the front.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,2, 406–416.
Craik, F. I. M., Govoni, R., Naveh-Benjamin, M., & Anderson, N. D. (1996). The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,125, 159–180.
Dienes, Z., & Altmann, G. T. M. (1997). Transfer of implicit knowledge across domains: How implicit and how abstract? In D. C. Berry (Ed.),How implicit is implicit learning? (pp. 107–123). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dienes, Z., Altmann, G. T. M., Kwan, L., & Goode, A. (1995). Unconscious knowledge of artificial grammars is applied strategically.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 1322–1338.
Dienes, Z., & Berry, D. [C.] (1997). Implicit learning: Below the subjective threshold.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,4, 3–23.
Dienes, Z., Broadbent, D. E., & Berry, D. C. (1991). Implicit and explicit knowledge bases in artificial grammar learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 875–887.
Dulany, D. E., Carlson, R. A., & Dewey, G. I. (1984). A case of syntactical learning and judgement: How conscious and how abstract?Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,113, 541–551.
Gomez, R. L., Gerken, L., & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (2000). The basis of transfer in artificial grammar learning.Memory & Cognition,28, 253–263.
Gordon, P. C., & Holyoak, K. J. (1983). Implicit learning and the generalization of the mere exposure effect.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,45, 492–500.
Graf, P., & Schacter, D. L. (1985). Implicit and explicit memory for new associations in normal and amnesic subjects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,11, 501–518.
Helman, S. (2000).The knowledge and processing underlying the structural mere exposure effect. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Reading.
Higham, P. A., Vokey, J. R., & Pritchard, J. L. (2000). Beyond dissociation logic: Evidence for controlled and automatic influences in artificial grammar learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,129, 457–470.
Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory.Journal of Memory & Language,30, 513–541.
Jacoby, L. L., & Dallas, M. (1981). On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,110, 306–340.
Jacoby, L. L., Woloshyn, V., & Kelley, C. (1989). Becoming famous without being recognized: Unconscious influences of memory produced by dividing attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,118, 115–125.
Kinder, A., & Assmann, A. (2000). Learning artificial grammars: No evidence for the acquisition of rules.Memory & Cognition,28, 1321–1332.
Kunst-Wilson, W. R., & Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Affective discrimination of stimuli that cannot be recognized.Science,207(1), 557–558.
Manza, L., & Bornstein, R. F. (1995). Affective discrimination and the implicit learning process.Consciousness & Cognition,4, 399–409.
Manza, L., Hallman, C., McCoy, A., Shumway, E., Ruczhak, M., Laepple, K., & Dangler, R. (1999, April).Structural mere exposure: The influence of instructional set and stimulus complexity on implicit learning. Paper presented at the Meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, Providence, RI.
Manza, L., Zizak, D., & Reber, A. S. (1998). Artificial grammar learning and the mere exposure effect. In M. A. Stadler & P. A. Frensch (Eds.),Handbook of implicit learning (pp. 201–222). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Mathews, R. C., Buss, R. R., Stanley, W. B., Blanchard-Fields, F., Cho, J. R., & Druhan, B. (1989). The role of implicit and explicit processes in learning from examples: A synergistic effect.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 1083–1100.
Merikle, P. M., & Reingold, E. M. (1991). Comparing direct (explicit) and indirect (implicit) measures to study unconscious memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 224–233.
Meulemans, T., & VanderLinden, M. (1997). Associative chunk strength in artificial grammar learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 1007–1028.
Mulligan, N. W. (1997). Attention and implicit memory tests: The effects of varying attentional load on conceptual priming.Memory & Cognition,25, 11–17.
Naveh-Benjamin, M., Craik, F. I. M., Gavrilescu, D., & Anderson, N. D. (2000). Asymmetry between encoding and retrieval processes: Evidence from divided attention and a calibration analysis.Memory & Cognition,28, 965–976.
Newell, B. R., & Bright, J. E. H. (2001). The relationship between the structural mere exposure effect and the implicit learning process.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,54A, 1087–1104.
Parkin, A. J., & Russo, R. (1990). Implicit and explicit memory and the automatic/effortful distinction.European Journal of Cognitive Psychology,2, 71–80.
Perruchet, P., & Pacteau, C. (1990). Synthetic grammar learning: Implicit rule abstraction or explicit fragmentary knowledge.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,119, 264–275.
Pothos, E. M., & Bailey, T. M. (2000). The role of similarity in artificial grammar learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 847–862.
Reber, A. S. (1967). Implicit learning of artificial grammars.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,6, 855–863.
Reber, A. S., Allen, R., & Regan, S. (1985). Syntactical learning and judgement, still unconscious and still abstract: Comment on Dulany, Carlson and Dewey.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,114, 17–24.
Reingold, E. M., & Toth, J. P. (1996). Process dissociations versus task dissociations: A controversy in progress. In G. Underwood (Ed.),Implicit cognition (pp. 159–202). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Roediger, H. L., III, & McDermott, K. B. (1993). Implicit memory in normal human subjects. In F. Boller & J. Grafman (Eds.), Handbook of neuropsychology (Vol. 8, pp. 63–130). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Schacter, D. L., Bowers, J., & Booker, J. (1989). Intention, awareness and implicit memory: The retrieval intentionality criterion. In S. Lewandowsky, J. C. Dunn, & K. Kirsner (Eds. ),Implicit memory: Theoretical issues (pp. 47–65). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Shanks, D. R., & St. John, M. F. (1994). Characteristics of dissociable human learning systems.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,17, 367–447.
Towse, J. N., & Neil, D. (1998). Analyzing human random generation behavior: A review of methods used and a computer program for describing performance.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,30, 583–591.
Turner, C. W., & Fischler, I. S. (1993). Speeded tests of implicit knowledge.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 1165–1177.
Whittlesea, B. W. A., & Price, J. R. (2001). Implicit /explicit memory versus analytic/nonanalytic processing: Rethinking the mere exposure effect.Memory & Cognition,29, 234–246.
Whittlesea, B. W. A., & Wright, R. L. (1997). Implicit (and explicit) learning: Acting adaptively without knowing the consequences.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 181–200.
Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,9(2, Pt. 2), 1–27.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The experiments reported in this article form part of the first author’s PhD thesis, which was supported by the Medical Research Council.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Helman, S., Berry, D.C. Effects of divided attention and speeded responding on implicit and explicit retrieval of artificial grammar knowledge. Memory & Cognition 31, 703–714 (2003). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196109
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196109