Abstract
Four experiments (totalN = 295) were conducted to determine whether within-modality changes in perceptual form between the study and the test phases of an experiment would moderate the role of the fluency heuristic in recognition memory. Experiment 1 showed that a change from pictures to words reduced the role of fluency in recognition memory. In Experiment 2, the same result was found using counterfeit study lists that supposedly consisted of pictures or words. Experiments 3 and 4 showed that changes in the font used to present the study and test words also attenuated the contribution of fluency to the recognition decision when font change was manipulated between subjects, but not within subjects. Results suggest that the fluency heuristic is subject to metacognitive control, since participants’ attributions of perceptual fluency depend on the perceived usefulness of fluency as a cue to recognition.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bernstein, I. H., &Welch, K. R. (1991). Awareness, false recognition, and the familiarity-priming effect.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,120, 324–328.
Clark, S. E. (1992). Word frequency effects in associative and item recognition.Memory & Cognition,20, 231–243.
Clarke, R., &Morton, J. (1983). Cross modality facilitation in tachistoscopic word recognition.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,35A, 79–96.
Craik, F. I. M., Moscovitch, M., &McDowd, J. M. (1994). Contributions of surface and conceptual information to performance on implicit and explicit memory tasks.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 864–875.
Dewhurst, S. A., &Conway, M. A. (1994). Pictures, images, and recollective experience.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 1088–1098.
Dodson, C. S., &Schacter, D. L. (2002). When false recognition meets metacognition: The distinctiveness heuristic.Journal of Memory & Language,46, 782–803.
Durso, F. T., &Johnson, M. K. (1979). Facilitation in naming and categorizing repeated pictures and words.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,5, 449–459.
Ellis, A. W. (1982). Modality-specific repletion priming of auditory word recognition.Current Psychological Research,2, 123–127.
Frigo, L. C., Reas, D. L., &LeCompte, D. C. (1999). Revelation without presentation: Counterfeit study list yields robust revelation effect.Memory & Cognition,27, 339–343.
Gellatly, A., Banton, P., &Woods, C. (1995). Salience and awareness in the familiarity-priming effect.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 1374–1379.
Goldinger, S. D., Kleider, H. M., &Shelley, E. (1999). The marriage of perception and memory: Creating two-way illusions with words and voices.Memory & Cognition,27, 328–338.
Higham, P. A., &Vokey, J. R. (2000). Judgment heuristics and recognition memory: Prime identification and target-processing fluency.Memory & Cognition,28, 574–584.
Hockley, W. E., &Consoli, A. (1999). Familiarity and recollection in item and associative recognition.Memory & Cognition,27, 657–664.
Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory.Journal of Memory & Language,30, 513–541.
Jacoby, L. L., &Dallas, M. (1981). On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,110, 306–340.
Jacoby, L. L., &Hayman, C. A. G. (1987). Specific visual transfer in visual word identification.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,13, 456–463.
Jacoby, L. L., &Whitehouse, K. (1989). An illusion of memory: False recognition influenced by unconscious perception.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,118, 126–135.
Jacoby, L. L., Woloshyn, V., &Kelley, C. (1989). Becoming famous without being recognized: Unconscious influences of memory produced by divided attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,118, 115–125.
Johnston, W., Hawley, K., &Elliott, J. (1991). Contribution of perceptual fluency to recognition judgments.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 210–223.
Kamas, E. N., &Reder, L. M. (1995). The role of familiarity in cognitive processing. In R. F. Lorch & E. J. O’Brien, (Eds.),Sources of coherence in reading (pp. 177–202). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kelley, C. M., &Rhodes, M. G. (2002). Making sense and nonsense of experience: Attributions in memory and judgment. In B. H. Ross (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 41, pp. 293–320). San Diego: Academic Press.
Koriat, A., &Levy-Sadot, R (2001). The combined contributions of the cue-familiarity and accessibility heuristics to feelings of knowing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,27, 34–53.
Kuçera, H., &Francis, W. N. (1967).Computational analysis of presentday American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
Lloyd, M. E., Westerman, D. L., &Miller, J. M. (2003). The fluency heuristic in recognition memory: The effect of repetition.Journal of Memory & Language,48, 603–614.
Mandler, G. (1980). Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence.Psychological Review,87, 252–271.
Masson, M., &Caldwell, J. (1998). Conceptually driven encoding episodes create perceptual misattributions.Acta Psychologica,98, 183–210.
Murrell, G. A., &Morton, J. (1974). Word recognition and morphemic structure.Journal of Experimental Psychology,102, 963–968.
Neisser, U. (1954). An experimental distinction between perceptual process and verbal response.Journal of Experimental Psychology,47, 399–402.
Rajaram, S. (1993). Remembering and knowing: Two means of access to the personal past.Memory & Cognition,21, 89–102.
Rajaram, S. (1996). Perceptual effects on remembering: Recollective processes in picture recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,22, 365–377.
Rajaram, S., &Roediger, H. L., III (1993). Direct comparison of four implicit memory tests.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 765–776.
Roediger, H. L., III, &Blaxton, T. A. (1987). Effects of varying modality, surface features, and retention interval on priming in word fragment completion.Memory & Cognition,15, 379–388.
Schacter, D. L., Israel, L., &Racine, C. (1999). Suppressing false recognition in younger and older adults: The distinctiveness heuristic.Journal of Memory & Language,40, 1–24.
Snodgrass, J. G., &Corwin, J. (1988). Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: Applications to dementia and amnesia.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,117, 34–50.
Snodgrass, J. G., &Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,6, 174–215.
Srinivas, K. (1993).Perceptual specif icity in nonverbal priming.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 582–602.
Tversky, A., &Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases.Science,185, 1124–1131.
Verfaellie, M., &Cermak, L. S. (1999). Perceptual fluency as a cue for recognition judgments in amnesia.Neuropsychology,13, 198–205.
Wagner, A. D., Gabrieli, J. D. E., &Verfaellie, M. (1997). Dissociations between familiarity processes in explicit recognition and implicit perceptual memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 305–323.
Weldon, M. S. (1991). Mechanisms underlying priming on perceptual tests.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 526–541.
Weldon, M. S., Roediger, H. L., III,Beitel, D. A., &Johnston, T.R. (1995). Perceptual and conceptual processes in implicit and explicit tests with picture fragment and word fragment cues.Journal of Memory & Language,34, 268–285.
Weldon, M. S., Roediger, H. L., III, &Challis, B. H. (1989). The properties of retrieval cues constrain the picture superiority effect.Memory & Cognition,17, 95–105.
Westerman, D. L. (2001). The role of familiarity in item recognition, associative recognition, and plurality recognition on self-paced and speeded tests.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,27, 723–732.
Westerman, D. L., Lloyd, M. L., &Miller, J. M. (2002). On the attribution of perceptual fluency in recognition memory: The role of expectation.Journal of Memory & Language,47, 607–617.
Whittlesea, B. W. A. (1993). Illusions of familiarity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 1235–1253.
Whittlesea, B. W. A., &Leboe, J. P. (2000). The heuristic basis of remembering and classification: Fluency, generation and resemblance.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,129, 84–106.
Whittlesea, B. W. A., &Price, J. R. (2001). Implicit /explicit memory versus analytic/nonanalytic processing: Rethinking the mere exposure effect.Memory & Cognition,29, 234–246.
Whittlesea, B. W. A., &Williams, L. D. (1998). Why do strangers feel familiar, but friends don’t? A discrepancy-attribution account of feelings of familiarity.Acta Psychologica,98, 141–165.
Whittlesea, B. W. A., &Williams, L. D. (2000). The source of feelings of familiarity: The discrepancy-attribution hypothesis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 547–565.
Whittlesea, B. W. A., &Williams, L. D. (2001). The discrepancyattribution hypothesis: I. The heuristic basis of feelings and familiarity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,27, 3–13.
Yonelinas, A. P. (1997). Recognition memory ROCs for item and associative information: The contribution of recollection and familiarity.Memory & Cognition,25, 747–763.
Yonelinas, A. P. (1999). The contribution of recollection and familiarity to recognition and source-memory judgments: A formal dualprocess model and an analysis of receiver operating characteristics.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,25, 1415–1434.
Yonelinas, A. P. (2002). The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research.Journal of Memory & Language,46, 441–517.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by Grant 1-R03-MH66156-01 from NIMH. We thank Vaibhav Bhatia, Laura Cavallari, Kristin Dust, Melissa Hardy, Tricia Leahey, and Kelly Vaccaro for assistance in testing participants.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Westerman, D.L., Miller, J.K. & Lloyd, M.E. Change in perceptual form attenuates the use of the fluency heuristic in recognition. Memory & Cognition 31, 619–629 (2003). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196102
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196102