Abstract
Numbers can be represented as number words or as digits, but are the two notations processed differently? Two experiments in which a flanker paradigm with a naming task was used were conducted, with digits and number words as targets and flankers. Reaction times were shortest when the flanker denoted the same numerical value as the target. The numerical distance between the target and a numerically different flanker modulated reaction times in all conditions, except for number word targets with digit flankers. The direction of this effect—targets were named faster when the flanker was numerically close than when it was far—indicates that the numerical magnitude representations of numbers are associatively connected. When the target and the flanker were presented in the same format, no difference was observed in the distance effects for the two formats. This indicates that number words activate the abstract representation of their numerical value in a way that is very similar to that for digits.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Algom, D., Dekel, A., &Pansky, A. (1996). The perception of number from the separability of the stimulus: The Stroop effect revisited.Memory & Cognition,24, 557–572.
Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., &van Rijn, H. (1993).The Celex lexical database [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Linguistic Data Consortium.
Banks, W. P., Fujii, M., &Kayra-Stuart, F. (1976). Semantic congruity effects in comparative judgments of magnitudes of digits.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,2, 435–447.
Besner, D., &Coltheart, M. (1979). Ideographic and alphabetic processing in skilled reading of English.Neuropsychologia,17, 467–472.
Blankenberger, S., &Vorberg, D. (1997). The single-format assump tion in arithmetic fact retrieval.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 721–738.
Campbell, J. I. D. (1994). Architectures for numerical cognition.Cognition,53, 1–44.
Campbell, J. I. D., &Clark, J. M. (1992). Cognitive number processing: An encoding-complex perspective. In J. I. D. Campbell (Ed.),The nature and origins of mathematical skills (pp. 457–491). Amsterdam: Elsevier, North-Holland.
Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Atkins, P., &Haller, M. (1993). Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches.Psychological Review,100, 589–608.
Dallas, M., &Merikle, P. (1976). Semantic processing of non-attended visual information.Canadian Journal of Psychology,30, 15–21.
Dehaene, S. (1989). The psychophysics of numerical comparison: A reexamination of apparently incompatible data.Perception & Psychophysics,45, 557–566.
Dehaene, S. (1992). Varieties of numerical abilities.Cognition,44, 1–42.
Dehaene, S. (1996). The organization of brain activations in number comparison: Event-related potentials and the additive factors method.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,8, 47–68.
Dehaene, S., &Akhavein, R. (1995). Attention, automaticity, and levels of representation in number processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 314–326.
Dehaene, S., Bossini, S., &Giraux, P. (1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,122, 371–396.
Dehaene, S., Dupoux, E., &Mehler, J. (1990). Is numerical comparison digital? Analogueical and symbolic effects in two-digit number comparison.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 626–641.
den Heyer, K., &Briand, K. (1986). Priming single digit numbers: Automatic spreading activation dissipates as a function of semantic distance.American Journal of Psychology,99, 315–340.
Dunbar, K., &MacLeod, C. M. (1984). A horse race of a different color: Stroop interference patterns with transformed words.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,10, 622–639.
Duncan, E. M., &McFarland, C. E., Jr. (1980). Isolating the effects of symbolic distance and semantic congruity in comparative judgments: An additive-factors analysis.Memory & Cognition,8, 612–622.
Dyer, F. N. (1973). The Stroop phenomenon and its use in the study of perceptual, cognitive, and response processes.Memory & Cognition,1, 106–120.
Eriksen, B. A., &Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task.Perception & Psychophysics,16, 143–149.
Ferrand, L. (1999). Why naming takes longer than reading?The special case of Arabic numbers. Acta Psychologica,100, 253–266.
Fias, W., Reynvoet, B., &Brysbaert, M. (2001). Are Arabic numerals processed as pictures in a Stroop interference task?Psychological Research,65, 242–249.
Flowers, J. H., Nelson, S. M., Carson, D., &Larsen, L. (1984). Automatic and expectancy-based priming effects in a digit naming task.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,10, 65–74.
Foltz, G. S., Poltrock, S. E., &Potts, G. R. (1984). Mental comparison of size and magnitude.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,10, 442–453.
Fox, L. A., Shor, R. E., &Steinman, R. J. (1971). Semantic gradients and interference in naming color, spatial direction and numerosity.Journal of Experimental Psychology,91, 59–65.
Henik, A., &Tzelgov, J. (1982). Is three greater than five: The relation between physical and semantic size in comparison tasks.Memory & Cognition,10, 389–395.
Holender, D., &Peereman, R. (1987). Differential processing of phonographic and logographic single-digit numbers by the two hemispheres. In G. Deloche & X. Seron (Eds.),Mathematical disabilities (pp. 43–85). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Klein, G. S. (1964). Semantic power measured through the interference of words with color-naming.American Journal of Psychology,77, 576–588.
Koechlin, E., Naccache, L., Block, E., &Dehaene, S. (1999). Primed numbers: Exploring the modularity of numerical representations with masked and unmasked semantic priming.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,25, 1882–1905.
Luce, R. D. (1986).Reaction times: Their role in inferring elementary mental organization. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lupker, S. J. (1979). The semantic nature of response competition in the picture-word interference task.Memory & Cognition,7, 485–495.
MacDonald, P. A., &Joordens, S. (2000). Investigating a memorybased account of negative priming: Support for selection-feature mismatch.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,26, 1478–1496.
MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review.Psychological Bulletin,109, 163–203.
MacLeod, C. M., &Dunbar, K. (1988). Training and Stroop-like interference: Evidence for a continuum of automaticity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,14, 126–135.
Marcel, T., &Forrin, B. (1974). Naming latency and the repetition of stimulus categories.Journal of Experimental Psychology,103, 450–460.
McCloskey, M. (1992). Cognitive mechanisms in numerical processing: Evidence from acquired dyscalculia.Cognition,44, 107–157.
Moyer, R. S., &Bayer, R. H. (1976). Mental comparison and the symbolic distance effect.Cognitive Psychology,8, 228–246.
Moyer, R. S., &Landauer, T. K. (1967). Time required for judgments of numerical inequality.Nature,215, 1519–1520.
Noël, M.-P. (1991). Influence des systèmes de notation des nombres sur les méchanismes d’encodage et de traitement numériques [Notational systems for numbers: Impact on the encoding mechanisms and numerical processes].L’Année Psychologique,91, 581–607.
Palef, S. R., &Olson, D. R. (1975). Spatial and verbal rivalry in a Strooplike task.Canadian Journal of Psychology,29, 201–209.
Paquet, L., &Lortie, C. (1990). Evidence for early selection: Precuing target location reduces interference from same-category distractors.Perception & Psychophysics,48, 382–388.
Pavese, A., &Umiltà, C. (1998). Symbolic distance between numerosity and identity modulates Stroop interference.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 1535–1545.
Pavese, A., &Umiltà, C. (1999). Further evidence on the effects of symbolic distance on Stroop-like interference.Psychological Research,62, 62–71.
Peereman, R., &Holender, D. (1985). Visual field differences for a number—non-number classification of alphabtic and ideographic stimuli.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,36A, 197–216.
Reynvoet, B., &Brysbaert, M. (1999). Single-digit and two-digit Arabic numerals address the same semantic number line.Cognition,72, 191–201.
Rosinski, R. R. (1977). Picture—word interference is semantically based.Child Development,48, 643–647.
Schwarz, W., &Ischebeck, A. (2000). Sequential effects in number comparison.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,26, 1606–1621.
Schwarz, W., & Ischebeck, A. (in press). On the relative speed account of number size interference in comparative judgments of numerals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance.
Smith, M. C., &Magee, L. E. (1980). Tracing the time course of picture— word processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,109, 373–392.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ischebeck, A. Differences between digit naming and number word reading in a flanker task. Memory & Cognition 31, 529–537 (2003). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196094
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196094