Abstract
Empirical tests were conducted on theelevated-attention hypothesis that low-frequency (LF) words are better recognized than high-frequency (HF) words because LF words attract more attention than do HF words (e.g., Glanzer & Adams, 1990). The elevated-attention hypothesis predicts that the hit rate advantage for LF words should be reduced by increases in attentional strain at study. We first tested this prediction in two experiments by varying the amount of experimenter-controlled study time (on the basis of the assumption that a decrease in study time would reduce the amount of resources available for studying a word). The elevated-attention hypothesis was confirmed, but only when words were studied for relatively short durations. This finding led us to formulate anearly-phase elevated-attention hypothesis that proposes that more attentional resources are allocated to LF words than to HF words only during the early phase of encoding (which produces the LF hit rate advantage in subsequent recognition) and that the allocation of attentional resources during the late phase of encoding is not greater for LF words than for HF words. An additional empirical test of this revised hypothesis was conducted: Experimenter-controlled study time and the composition of the to-be-remembered pairs of words were varied orthogonally. The results confirmed the early-phase elevated-attention hypothesis.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Atkinson, R. C., &Juola, J. F. (1974). Search and decision processes in recognition memory. In D. H. Krantz, R. C. Atkinson, R. D. Luce, & P. Suppes (Eds.),Contemporary developments in mathematical psychology: Vol. 1. Learning, memory, and thinking (pp. 243–293). San Francisco: Freeman.
Atkinson, R. C., &Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In K. W. Spence & J. T. Spence (Eds.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 2, pp. 89–195). New York: Academic Press.
Besner, D., &McCann, R. S. (1987). Word frequency and pattern distortion in visual word identification and production: An examination of four classes of models. In M. Coltheart (Ed.),Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 201–219). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Clark, S. E., &Shiffrin, R. M. (1992). Cuing effects and associative information in recognition memory.Memory & Cognition,20, 580–598.
Craik, F. I. M., &Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,11, 671–684.
Gillund, G., &Shiffrin, R. M. (1984). A retrieval model for both recognition and recall.Psychological Review,91, 1–67.
Glanzer, M., &Adams, J. K. (1985). The mirror effect in recognition memory.Memory & Cognition,3, 8–20.
Glanzer, M., &Adams, J. K. (1990). The mirror effect in recognition memory: Data and theory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 5–16.
Gorman, A. M. (1961). Recognition memory for nouns as a function of abstractness and frequency.Journal of Experimental Psychology,61, 23–29.
Herdman, C. M. (1992). Attentional resource demands of visual word recognition in naming and lexical decisions.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,18, 460–470.
Hintzman, D. L., &Curran, T. (1995). When encoding fails: Instructions, feedback, and registration without learning.Memory & Cognition,23, 213–226.
Hintzman, D. L., Curran, T., &Oppy, B. (1992). Effects of similarity and repetition on memory: Registration without learning?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 667–680.
Hirshman, E., &Arndt, J. (1997). Discriminating alternative conceptions of false recognition: The cases of word concreteness and word frequency.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 1306–1323.
Hirshman, E., &Palij, M. (1992). Rehearsal and the WFE in recognition memory.Journal of Memory & Language,31, 477–484.
Hockley, W. E. (1994). Reflections of the mirror effect for item and associative recognition.Memory & Cognition,22, 713–722.
Hoshino, Y. (1991). A bias in favor of the positive response to highfrequency words in recognition memory.Memory & Cognition,19, 607–616.
Howes, D. H., &Solomon, R. L. (1951). Visual duration threshold as a function of word probability.Journal of Experimental Psychology,41, 401–410.
Inhoff, A. W., &Rayner, K. (1986). Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading: Effects of word frequency.Perception & Psychophysics,40, 431–439.
Johnston, W. A., &Hawley, K. J. (1994). Perceptual inhibition of expected inputs: The key that opens closed minds.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,1, 56–72.
Joordens, S., &Hockley, W. E. (2000). Recollection and familiarity through the looking glass: When old does not mirror new.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, memory, and Cognition,26, 1534–1555.
Kim, K., &Glanzer, M. (1993). Speed versus accuracy instructions, study time, and the mirror effect.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, memory, and Cognition,19, 638–652.
Kučera, H., &Francis, W. (1983).Computational analysis of presentday American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
LaBerge, D., &Brown, V. (1989). Theory of attentional operations in shape identification.Psychological Review,96, 101–124.
Maddox, W. T., &Estes, W. K. (1997). Direct and indirect stimulusfrequency effects in recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 539–559.
Malmberg, K. J., &Murnane, K. (2002). List composition and the word-frequency effect for recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,28, 630–644.
Malmberg, K. J., Steyvers, M., Stephens, J. D., &Shiffrin, R. M. (2002). Feature frequency effects in recognition memory.Memory & Cognition,30, 607–613.
Malmberg, K. J., Zeelenberg, R., & Shiffrin, R. M. (in press). Modeling the effects of midazolam on the hippocampus and recognition memory. In S. Becker, S. Thrun, & K. Obermeyer (Eds.),Advances in neural information processing systems 15.
Mandler, G. (1980). Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence.Psychological Review,87, 252–271.
Nelson, T. O., &Narens, L. (1990). Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 26, pp. 125–173). San Diego: Academic Press.
Norman, D. A., &Bobrow, D. G. (1975). On data-limited and resourcelimited processes.Cognitive Psychology,7, 44–65.
Paap, K. R., McDonald, J. E., Schvaneveldt, R. W., &Noel, R. W. (1987). Frequency and pronounceability in visually presented naming and lexical decision tasks: Word frequency and pattern distortion in visual word identification. In M. Coltheart (Ed.),Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 221–243). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Rao, K. V., &Proctor, R. W. (1984). Study-phase processing and the word frequency effect in recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,10, 386–394.
Reder, L. M., Nhouyvanisvong, A., Schunn, C. D., Ayers, M. S., Angstadt, P., &Hiraki, K. (2000). A mechanistic account of the mirror effect for word frequency: A computational model of remember— know judgments in a continuous recognition paradigm.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 294–320.
Rundus, D. (1971). Analysis of rehearsal processes in free recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology,89, 63–77.
Schulman, A. I. (1967). Word length and rarity in recognition memory.Psychonomic Science,9, 211–212.
Shaughnessy, J. J., Zimmerman, J., &Underwood, B. J. (1972). Further evidence on the MP—DP effect in free-recall learning.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,11, 1–12.
Shepard, R. N. (1967). Recognition memory for words, sentences, and pictures.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,6, 156–163.
Shiffrin, R. M., &Steyvers, M. (1997). A model for recognition memory: REM—retrieving effectively from memory.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,4, 145–166.
Tan, L., &Ward, G. (2000). A recency-based account of the primacy effect in free recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 1589–1625.
Townsend, J. T., &Ashby, F. G. (1984). Measurement scales and statistics: The misconception misconceived.Psychological Bulletin,96, 394–401.
Ward, G., & Woodward, G., Stevens, A., & Stinson, C. (in press). Using overt rehearsals to explain the word frequency effect in free recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition.
Wixted, J. T. (1992). Subjective memorability and the mirror effect.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 681–690.
Zechmeister, E. B., Curt, C., &Sebastian, J. A. (1978). Errors in a recognition memory task are a U-shaped function of word frequency.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,11, 371–373.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
This research was supported by NIMH NRSA Postdoctoral Fellowship MH12643 to K.J.M. and NIMH Grant K05-MH1075 to T.O.N.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Malmberg, K.J., Nelson, T.O. The word frequency effect for recognition memory and the elevated-attention hypothesis. Memory & Cognition 31, 35–43 (2003). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196080
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196080