Abstract
In three experiments with pigeons, the similarity of unreinforced test stimuli to a reinforced stimulus and the frequency of reinforcement associated with a stimulus were varied. The stimulus on each trial was a small spot that appeared in different hues or, in Experiment 3, different forms. Differential response frequency and reaction time (RT) patterns emerged: Changes in similarity affected the percentage of stimuli responded to but left the shape of RT distributions about the same, whereas changes in reinforcement shifted RT distributions but had little effect on the percentage of responses. When the similarity and reinforcement variables were applied to the same stimuli (Experiment 2), their effects were largely independent. A generalization procedure (Experiment 3) replicated the similarity effects of the initial discrimination procedure. The RT distributions were modeled by a diffusion process, and implications for a memory-instance model were suggested.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Blough, D. S. (1967). Stimulus generalization as signal detection in pigeons.Science,158, 940–941.
Blough, D. S. (1978). Reaction times of pigeons on a wavelength discrimination task.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,30, 133–137.
Blough, D. S. (1988). Quantitative relations between visual search speed and target-distractor similarity.Perception & Psychophysics,43, 57–71.
Blough, D. S. (1989). Contrast as seen in visual search reaction times.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,52, 199–211.
Blough, D. S. (1992). Effects of stimulus frequency and reinforcement variables on reaction time.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,57, 47–50.
Blough, D. S. (1996). Error factors in pigeon discrimination and delayed matching.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,22, 118–131.
Blough, D. S. (1998). Context reinforcement degrades discriminative control: A memory approach.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,24, 185–199.
Blough, D. S. (2000). Effects of priming, discriminability, and reinforcement on reaction-time components of pigeon visual search.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,26, 50–63.
Blough, D. S. (2001). Some contributions of signal detection theory to the analysis of stimulus control in animals.Behavioural Processes,54, 127–136.
Blough, D. S. (2002). Measuring the search image: Expectation, detection, and recognition in pigeon visual search.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,28, 397–405.
Chase, S., &Heinemann, E. G. (1991). Memory limitations in human and animal signal detection. In M. L. Commons, J. A. Nevin, & M. C. Davison (Eds.),Signal detection: Mechanisms, models, and applications (pp. 121–138). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Church, R. (2002). Temporal learning. In H. Pashler & J. Wixted (Eds.),Steven’s handbook of experimental psychology: Vol. 3. Learning, motivation and emotion (3rd ed., pp. 365–393). New York: Wiley.
Davison, M., &Nevin, J. A. (1999). Stimuli, reinforcers, and behavior: An integration.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,71, 439–482.
Ennis, D. M. (1988). Confusable and discriminable stimuli: Comment on Nosofsky (1986) and Shepard (1986).Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,177, 408–411.
Espinoza-Varas, B., &Watson, C. S. (1994). Effects of decision criterion on response latencies of binary decisions.Perception & Psychophysics,55, 190–203.
Gibbon, J. (1995). Dynamics of time matching: Arousal makes better seem worse.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,2, 208–215.
Gibbon, J., &Allan, J. G. (Eds.) (1984).Timing and time perception. New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
Gibbon, J., &Church, R. M. (1984). Sources of variance in an information processing theory of timing. In H. L. Roitblat, T. G. Bever, & H. S. Terrace (Eds.),Animal cognition (pp. 465–488). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Green, D. M., &Swets, J. A. (1966).Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley.
Heinemann, E. G. (1983). A memory model for decision processes in pigeons. In M. L. Commons, R. J. Herrnstein, & A. R. Wagner (Eds.),Quantitative analyses of behavior: Discriminative processes (Vol. 4, pp. 3–19). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
Killeen, P. R., &Hall, S. S. (2001). The principal components of response strength.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,75, 111–134.
Killeen, P. R., Hall, S. S., Reilly, M. P., &Kettle, L. C. (2002). Molecular analyses of the principal components of response strength.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,78, 127–160.
Luce, R. D. (1986).Response times: Their role in inferring elementary mental organization. New York: Oxford University Press.
Mackintosh, N. J. (1983).Conditioning and associative learning. New York: Oxford University Press.
Macmillan, N. A. (2002). Signal detection theory. In H. Pashler & J. Wixted (Eds.),Stevens’ handbook of experimental psychology: Vol. 4. Methodology in experimental psychology (3rd ed., pp. 43–90). New York: Wiley.
Nevin, J. A. (1965). Decision theory in studies of discrimination in animals.Science,150, 1057.
Ratcliff, R. (1978). A theory of memory retrieval.Psychological Review,85, 59–108.
Ratcliff, R. (1988). Continuous versus discrete information processing: Modeling the accumulation of partial information.Psychological Review,95, 238–255.
Ratcliff, R., &Rouder, J. N. (1998). Modeling response times for two-choice decisions.Psychological Science,9, 347–356.
Ratcliff, R., &Tuerlinckx, F. (2002). Estimating parameters of the diffusion model: Approaches to dealing with contaminant reaction times and parameter variability.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,9, 438–481.
Roberts, S. (1987). Evidence for distinct serial processes in animals: The multiplicative-factors method.Animal Learning & Behavior,15, 135–173.
Roberts, S., &Pashler, H. (2000). How persuasive is a good fit? A comment on theory testing.Psychological Review,107, 358–367.
Shepard, R. N. (1988). Time and distance in generalization and discrimination: Reply to Ennis (1988).Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,117, 415–416.
Smith, P. L. (1995). Psychophysically principled models of visual simple reaction time.Psychological Review,102, 567–591.
Sternberg, S. (1998). Discovering mental processing stages: The method of additive factors. In D. Scarborough & S. Sternberg (Eds.),Invitation to cognitive science: Vol. 4. Methods, models, and conceptual issues (pp. 703–863). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, Bradford Books.
Spence, K. (1937). The differential response in animals to stimuli varying within a single dimension.Psychological Review,44, 430–444.
Van Zandt, T. (2002). Analysis of response time distributions. In H. Pashler & J. Wixted (Eds.),Stevens’ handbook of experimental psychology: Vol. 4. Methodology in experimental psychology (3rd ed., pp. 461–516). New York: Wiley.
Van Zandt, T., &Ratcliff, R. (1995). Statistical mimicking of reaction time data: Single-process models, parameter variability, and mixtures.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,2, 20–54.
Wagner, A. R. (1981). SOP: A model of automatic memory processing in animal behavior. In N. E. Spear & R. R. Miller (Eds.),Information processing in animals: Memory mechanisms (pp. 5–47). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Wagner, A. R., &Brandon, S. E. (2001). A componential theory of Pavlovian conditioning. In R. R. Mowrer & S. B. Klein (Eds.),Handbook of contemporary learning theories (pp. 23–64). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported in part by Grant MH61782 from the National Institutes of Health.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Blough, D.S. Reaction time signatures of discriminative processes: Differential effects of stimulus similarity and incentive. Animal Learning & Behavior 32, 157–172 (2004). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196017
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196017