Abstract
In three experiments, we examined pigeons’ recognition of video images of human faces. In Experiment 1, pigeons were trained to discriminate between frontal views of human faces in a go/no-go discrimination procedure. They then showed substantial generalization to novel views, even though human faces change radically as viewpoint changes. In Experiment 2, the pigeons tested in Experiment 1 failed to transfer to the faces dynamically rotating in depth. In Experiment 3, the pigeons trained to discriminate the dynamic stimuli showed excellent transfer to the corresponding static views, but responses to the positive faces decreased at novel viewpoints outside the range spanned by the dynamic stimuli. These results suggest that pigeons are insensitive to the three-dimensional properties of video images. Consideration is given to the nature of the task, relating to the identification of three-dimensional objects and to perceptual classifications based on similarity judgments.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding.Psychological Review,94, 115–147.
Cabe, P. A. (1976). Transfer of discrimination from solid objects to pictures by pigeons: A test of theoretical models of pictorial perception.Perception & Psychophysics,19, 545–550.
Cerella, J. (1977). Absence of perspective processing in the pigeon.Pattern Recognition,9, 65–68.
Cerella, J. (1990a). Pigeon pattern perception: Limit on perspective invariance.Perception,19, 141–159.
Cerella, J. (1990b). Shape constancy in the pigeon: The perspective transformations decomposed. In M. L. Commons, R. J. Herrnstein, S. M. Kosslyn, & D. B. Mumford (Eds.),Quantitative analyses of behavior (Vol. 8, pp. 145–163), Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Cook, R. G., &Katz, J. S. (1999). Dynamic object perception by pigeons.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,25, 194–210.
Corballis, M. C. (1988). Recognition of disoriented shapes.Psychological Review,95, 115–123.
Delius, J. D. (1992). Categorical discrimination of objects and pictures by pigeons.Animal Learning & Behavior,20, 301–311.
Delius, J. D., Emmerton, J., Hörster, W., Jäger, R., &Ostheim, J. (1999). Picture-object recognition in pigeons.Current Psychology of Cognition,18, 621–656.
Edelman, S. (1999).Representation and recognition in vision. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Edelman, S., &Bülthoff, H. H. (1992). Orientation dependence in the recognition of familiar and novel views of 3D objects.Vision Research,32, 2385–2400.
Emmerton, J. (1983). Vision. In M. Abs (Ed.),Physiology and behavior of the pigeon (pp. 245–266). London: Academic Press.
Hendricks, J. (1966). Flicker threshold as determined by a modified conditioned suppression procedure.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,9, 501–506.
Herrnstein, R. J., &Loveland, D. H. (1964). Complex visual concept in the pigeon.Science,146, 549–551.
Honig, W. K., &Urcuioli, P. J. (1981). The legacy of Guttman and Kalish (1956): Twenty-five years of research on stimulus generalization.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,36, 405–445.
Huber, L. (2001). Visual categorization in pigeons. In R. G. Cook (Ed.),Avian visual cognition. Retrieved 2002 from http://www.pigeon.psy.tufts.edu/avc/huber/default.htm.
Huber, L., &Lenz, R. (1993). A test of the linear feature model of polymorphous concept discrimination with pigeons.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,46B, 1–18.
Huber, L., Troje, N. F., Loidolt, M., Aust, U., &Grass, D. (2000). Natural categorization through multiple feature learning in pigeons.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,53B, 341–357.
Jitsumori, M. (1993). Category discrimination of artificial polymorphous stimuli based on feature learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,19, 244–254.
Jitsumori, M., &Delius, J. D. (2001). Object recognition and object categorization in animals. In T. Matsuzawa (Ed.),Primate origins of human cognition and behavior (pp. 269–292). Tokyo: Springer-Verlag.
Jitsumori, M., Natori, M., &Okuyama, K. (1999). Recognition of moving video images of conspecifics by pigeons: Effects of individuals, static and dynamic motion cues, and movement.Animal Learning & Behavior,27, 303–315.
Jitsumori, M., &Yoshihara, M. (1997). Categorical discrimination of human facial expressions by pigeons: A test of the linear feature model.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,50B, 253–268.
Logothetis, N. K., Pauls, J., Bülthoff, H. H., &Poggio, T. (1994). View-dependent object recognition in monkeys.Current Biology,4, 401–414.
Logothetis, N. K., Pauls, J., Bülthoff, H. H., &Poggio, T. (1995). Shape representation in the inferior temporal cortex of monkeys.Current Biology,5, 552–563.
Marr, D., &Nishihara, H. K. (1978). Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: Series B,200, 269–294.
Medin, D. L., &Schaffer, M. M. (1978). Context theory of classification learning.Psychological Review,85, 207–238.
Moses, Y. (1993).Face recognition: Generalization to novel images. PhD thesis, Weizmann Institute of Science, Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Israel.
Moses, Y., Ullman, S., &Edelman, S. (1996). Generalization to novel images in upright and inverted faces.Perception,25, 443–461.
Nosofsky, R. M. (1991). Tests of an exemplar model for relating perceptual classification and recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,17, 3–27.
Peissig, J. J., Young, M. E., Wasserman, E. A., &Biederman, I. (1999). The pigeon’s perception of depth-rotated shapes.Current Psychology of Cognition,18, 657–690.
Peissig, J. J., Young, M. E., Wasserman, E. A., &Biederman, I. (2000). Seeing things from a different angle: The pigeon’s recognition of single geons rotated in depth.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,26, 115–132.
Phelps, M. T., &Roberts, W. A. (1994). Memory for pictures of upright and inverted primate faces in humans (Homo sapiens), squirrel monkeys (Saimili sciureus), and pigeons (Columba livia).Journal of Comparative Psychology,108, 114–125.
Powell, R. W. (1967). The pulse-to-cycle fraction as a determinant of critical flicker fusion in the pigeon.Psychological Record,17, 151–160.
Reid, S. L., &Spetch, M. L. (1998). Perception of pictorial depth cues by pigeons.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,5, 698–704.
Spetch, M. L., Friedman, A., &Reid, S. L. (2001). The effect of distinct parts on recognition of depth-rotated objects by pigeons (Columba livia) and humans.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,130, 238–255.
Spetch, M. L., Kelly, D. M., &Lechelt, D. P. (1998). Encoding of spatial information in images of an outdoor scene by pigeons and humans.Animal Learning & Behavior,26, 85–102.
Tarr, M. J., &Pinker, S. (1989). When does human object recognition use a viewer-centered reference frame?Psychological Science,1, 253–256.
Thompson, P. (1980). Margaret Thatcher: A new illusion.Perception,9, 483–484.
Troje, N. F., Huber, L., Loidolt, M., Aust, U., &Fieder, M. (1999). Categorical learning in pigeons: The role of texture and shape in complex static stimuli.Vision Research,39, 353–366.
Ullman, S. (1989). Aligning pictorial descriptions: An approach to object recognition.Cognition,32, 193–254.
Ullman, S. (1998). Three-dimensional object recognition based on the combination of views.Cognition,67, 21–44.
Valentine, T. (1988). Upside-down faces: A review of the effect of inversion upon face recognition.British Journal of Psychology,79, 471–491.
Vaughan, W., &Greene, S. L. (1984). Pigeon visual memory capacity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,10, 256–271.
Vetter, T., Hurlbert, A., &Poggio, T. (1995). View-based models of 3D object recognition: Invariance to imaging transformations.Cerebral Cortex,5, 262–269.
von Fersen, L., &Lea, S. E. G. (1990). Category discrimination by pigeons using five polymorphous features.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,54, 69–84.
Wasserman, E. A., Gagliardi, J. L., Cook, B. R., Kirkpatrick-Steger, K., Astley, S. L., &Biederman, I. (1996). The pigeon’s recognition of drawings of depth-rotated stimuli.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,22, 205–221.
Watanabe, S. (1993). Object-picture equivalence in the pigeon: An analysis with natural concept and pseudo-concept discriminations.Behavioural Processes,30, 225–232.
Watanabe, S., Lea, S. E. G., &Dittrich, W. H. (1993). What can we learn from experiments on pigeon concept discrimination? In H. P. Zeigler & H. J. Bischof (Eds.),Vision, brain, and behavior in birds (pp. 351–376). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by Grant 13610076 from the Ministry of Education, Science, and Culture to M.J. We thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions; Xingzxang Zhang, who prepared the stimuli and also carried out some of the phases of the present experiments; and Edward A. Wasserman, for his helpful suggestions on an earlier draft of this article.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jitsumori, M., Makino, H. Recognition of static and dynamic images of depth-rotated human faces by pigeons. Animal Learning & Behavior 32, 145–156 (2004). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196016
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196016