Animal Learning & Behavior

, Volume 32, Issue 1, pp 105–113 | Cite as

Influences of social learning on mate-choice decisions



Evidence from both field and laboratory is consistent with the hypothesis that animals can acquire mate preferences by observing the mating behavior of others. It is difficult, however, to distinguish social learning about mates from a host of other social effects on mating that do not produce changes in preferences. Examples are drawn from laboratory studies on mate choice in female and male Japanese quail that illustrate ways in which social cues influence mating decisions. Quail of both sexes use social cues to modify their mate choices, but the sexes use the information to serve different purposes. Female quail gain preferences for males seen mating with other females, whereas males avoid females that they had observed mating with other males. This sex difference in social learning provides an example of how costs and benefits of sexual behavior can shape decision-making processes. Implications of the influence of social learning on sexual selection are briefly discussed.


  1. Agrawal, A. F. (2001). The evolutionary consequences of copying male traits.Behavioral Ecology & Sociobiology,51, 33–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akins, C. K., Levens, N., &Bakondy, H. (2002). The role of static features of males in the mate choice behavior of female Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica).Behavioural Processes,58, 97–103.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alatalo, R. V., Lundberg, A., &Glynn, C. (1986). Female pied flycatchers choose territory quality and not male characteristics.Nature,323, 152–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andersson, M., &Iwasa, Y. (1996). Sexual selection.Trends in Ecology & Evolution,11, 53–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Badyaev, A. V., &Martin, T. E. (2000). Sexual dimorphism in relation to current selection in the house finch.Evolution,54, 987–997.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Baptista, L. F., &Trail, P. W. (1992). The role of song in the evolution of passerine diversity.Systematic Biology,41, 242–247.Google Scholar
  7. Bateson, P. (1978). Sexual imprinting and optimal outbreeding.Nature,273, 659–660.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bateson, P. (1983).Mate choice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Birkhead, T. R., &Biggins, J. D. (1997). Sperm competition mechanisms in birds: Models and data.Behavioral Ecology,9, 253–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Birkhead, T. R., Wishart, G. J., &Biggins, J. D. (1995). Sperm precedence in the domestic fowl.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: Series B,261, 285–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Blackwell, P. R.Y., &Passmore, N. I. (1996). Time constraints and multiple choice criteria in the sampling behavior and mate choice of the fiddler crab,Uca annupiles.Behavioral Ecology & Sociobiology,38, 407–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bradbury, J. W., &Gibson, R. M. (1983). Leks and mate choice. In P. Bateson (Ed.),Mate choice (pp. 109–140). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Bradbury, J. W., Vehrencamp, S. L., &Gibson, R. M. (1985). Leks and the unanimity of female choice. In P. J. Greenwood, P.H. Harvey, & M. Slatkin (Eds.),Evolution: Essays in honour of John Maynard Smith (pp. 301–314). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Briggs, S. E., Godin, J.-G. J., &Dugatkin, L. A. (1996). Mate-choice copying under predation risk in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata).Behavioral Ecology,7, 151–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brooks, R. (1996). Copying and the repeatability of mate choice.Behavioral Ecology & Sociobiology,39, 323–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Brooks, R. (1998). The importance of mate copying and cultural inheritance of mating preferences.Trends in Ecology & Evolution,13, 45–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Brooks, R. (1999). Mate choice copying in guppies: Females avoid the place where they saw courtship.Behaviour,136, 411–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cheng, K. M., &Kimura, M. (1990). Mutations and major variants in Japanese quail. In R. D. Crawford (Ed.),Poultry breeding and genetics: Developments in animal and veterinary sciences (pp. 333–362). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  19. Clutton-Brock, T. H., Hiraiwa-Hasegawa, M., &Robertson, A. (1989). Mate choice on fallow deer leks.Nature,340, 463–465.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Collins, S. A., Hubbard, C., &Houtman, A. M. (1994). Female mate choice in zebra finches: The effect of male beak color and male song.Behavioral Ecology & Sociobiology,35, 21–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Crews, D., &Moore, M. C. (1986). Evolution of mechanisms controlling mating behavior.Science,231, 121–125.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Deutsch, J. C., &Nefdt, R. J. C. (1992). Olfactory cues influence female choice in two lek-breeding antelopes.Nature,356, 596–598.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Domjan, M., &Hall, S. (1986a). Determinants of social proximity in Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica): Male behavior.Journal of Comparative Psychology,100, 59–67.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Domjan, M., &Hall, S. (1986b). Sexual dimorphism in the social proximity behavior of Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica).Journal of Comparative Psychology,100, 68–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dugatkin, L. A. (1992). Sexual selection and imitation: Females copy the mate choice of others.American Naturalist,139, 1384–1389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dugatkin, L. A. (1996). Copying and mate choice. In C. M. Heyes & B. G. Galef, Jr. (Eds.),Social learning in animals: The roots of culture (pp. 85–106). San Diego: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Dugatkin, L. A. (1998). A comment on Lafleur et al.’s re-evaluation of mate-choice copying in guppies.Animal Behaviour,56, 513–514.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dugatkin, L. A., &Godin, J.-G. J. (1992). Reversal of female mate choice by copying in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata).Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: Series B,249, 179–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Dugatkin, L. A., &Godin, J.-G. J. (1993). Female mate copying in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata): Age-dependent effects.Behavioral Ecology,4, 289–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Dugatkin, L. A., &Godin, J.-G. J. (1998). Effects of hunger on matechoice copying in the guppy.American Naturalist,104, 194–202.Google Scholar
  31. Dugatkin, L. A., &Hšglund, J. (1995). Delayed breeding and the evolution of mate copying in lekking species.Journal of Theoretical Biology,174, 261–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Endler, J. A. (1991). Variation in the appearance of guppy color patterns to guppies and their predators under different visual conditions.Vision Research,31, 587–608.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Erickson, C. J., &Zenone, P. G. (1976). Courtship differences in male ring doves: Avoidance of cuckoldry?Science,192, 1353–1354.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Freeberg, T.M. (2000). Culture and courtship in vertebrates: A review of social learning and transmission of courtship systems and mating patterns.Behavioural Processes,51, 177–192.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Freeberg, T. M. (2004). Social transmission of courtship behavior and mating preferences in brown-headed cowbirds,Molothrus ater.Learning & Behavior,32, 122–130.Google Scholar
  36. Freeberg, T. M., Duncan, S. D., Kast, T. L., &Enstrom, D. A. (1999). Cultural influences on female mate choice: An experimental test in cowbirds,Molothrus ater.Animal Behaviour,57, 421–426.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Galef, B. G., Jr., &White, D. J. (1998). Mate-choice copying in Japanese quail,Coturnix coturnix japonica.Animal Behaviour,55, 545–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Galef, B. G., Jr., &White, D. J. (2000). Evidence of social effects on mate choice in vertebrates.Behavioural Processes,51, 167–175.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gallagher, J. E. (1976). Sexual imprinting: Effects of various regimens of social experience on mate preference in Japanese quail,Coturnix coturnix japonica.Behaviour,57, 91–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Gibson, R. M. (1992). Lek formation in sage grouse: The effect of female choice on male territory settlement.Animal Behaviour,43, 443–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Gibson, R. M., &Bachman, G. C. (1992). The costs of female choice in a lekking bird.Behavioral Ecology,3, 300–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Gibson, R. M., Bradbury, J. W., &Vehrencamp, S. L. (1991). Mate choice in lekking sage grouse revisited: The roles of vocal display, female site fidelity, and copying.Behavioral Ecology,2, 165–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Gibson, R. M., &Hšglund, J. (1992). Copying and sexual selection.Trends in Ecology & Evolution,7, 229–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Gibson, R. M., &Langen, T. A. (1996). How do animals choose their mates?Trends in Ecology & Evolution,11, 468–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Godin, J.-G. J., &Briggs, S. E. (1996). Female mate choice under predation risk in the guppy.Animal Behaviour,51, 117–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Goldschmidt, T., Bakker, T. C., &Feuth-de Bruijn, E. (1993). Selective copying in mate choice of female sticklebacks.Animal Behaviour,45, 541–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Gong, A., &Gibson, R. M. (1996). Reversal of a female preference after visual exposure to a predator in the guppy,Poecilia reticulata.Animal Behaviour,52, 1007–1015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Gould, J. L., &Gould, C. G. (1997).Sexual selection: Mate choice and courtship in nature. New York: American Scientific Library.Google Scholar
  49. Grant, J. W. A., &Green, L. D. (1996). Mate copying versus preference for actively courting males by female Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes).Behavioral Ecology,7, 165–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Heindl, M., &Winkler, H. (2003). Female canaries (Serinus canaria) associate more with males that contrast strongly against the background.Ethology,109, 259–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Hess, E. H., Petrovich, S. B., &Goodwin, E. B. (1976). Induction of parental behavior in Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica).Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology,90, 244–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Hšglund, J., Alatalo, R. V. (1995).Leks. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Horne, T. J., &Ylšnen, H. (1996). Female bank voles (Clethrionomys glareolus) prefer dominant males; but what if there is no choice?Behavioral Ecology & Sociobiology,38, 401–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Houde, A. E. (1997).Sex, color, and mate choice in guppies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Janetos, A. C. (1980). Strategies of female mate choice: A theoretical analysis.Behavioral Ecology & Sociobiology,7, 107–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Jennions, M. D., Blackwell, P. Y., &Passmore, N. I. (1995). Repeatability of mate choice: The effect of size in the African painted reed frog,Hyperolius marmoratus.Animal Behaviour,49, 181–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Jennions, M. D., &Petrie, M. (1997). Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: A review of causes and consequences.American Naturalist,72, 283–327.Google Scholar
  58. Kiester, R. (1979). Conspecifics as cues: A mechanism for habitat selection in the Panamanian grass anole (Anolis auratus).Behavioral Ecology & Sociobiology,5, 323–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Kirkpatrick, M., &Dugatkin, L. A. (1994). Sexual selection and the evolutionary effects of copying mate choice.Behavioral Ecology & Sociobiology,34, 443–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Kodric-Brown, A., &Nicoletto, P. F. (2001). Age and experience affect female choice in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata).American Naturalist,157, 316–323.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Kraak, S. B. M. (1996). “Copying mate choice”: Which phenomena deserve this term?Behavioural Processes,36, 99–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Lafleur, D. L., Lozano, G. A., &Sclafani, M. (1997). Female matechoice copying in guppies,Poecilia reticulata: A re-evaluation.Animal Behaviour,54, 579–586.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Laland, K. N. (1994). Sexual selection with a culturally transmitted mating preference.Theoretical Population Biology,45, 1–15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Lill, A. (1974). Sexual behavior of the lek-forming white-bearded manakin (Manacus manacus trinitatis Hartert).Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie,36, 1–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Losey, G. S., Stanton, F. G., Telecky, T.M., Tyler, W. A., III, & the Zoology 691 Graduate Seminar (1986). Copying others, an evolutionarily stable strategy for mate choice: A model.American Naturalist,128, 653–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Magnhagen, C. (1991). Predation risk as a cost of reproduction.Trends in Ecology & Evolution,6, 183–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. McComb, K., &Clutton-Brock, T. H. (1999). Is mate choice copying or aggregation responsible for skewed distributions of females on leks?Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: Series B,255, 13–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Mennill, D. J., Ratcliffe, L. M., &Boag, P. T. (2002). Female eavesdropping on male song contests in songbirds.Science,296, 873.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Mills, A. D., Crawford, L. L., Domjan, M., &Faure, J. M. (1997). The behavior of the Japanese or domestic quailCoturnix japonica.Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews,21, 261–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Nichols, C. R. (1991).A comparison of the reproductive and behave ioral differences in feral and domestic Japanese quail. Vancouver: University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
  71. Nordell, S. E., &Valone, T. J. (1998). Mate choice copying as public information.Ecology Letters,1, 74–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Ophir, A., &Galef, B. G., Jr. (2003a). Female Japanese quail affiliate with live males that they have seen mate on video.Animal Behaviour,66, 369–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Ophir, A., &Galef, B. G., Jr. (2003b). Female Japanese quail that “eavesdrop” on fighting males prefer losers to winners.Animal Behaviour,66, 399–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Otter, K., McGregor, P. K., Terry, A. M. R., Burford, F. R. L., Peake, T.M., &Dabelsteen, T. (1999). Do female great tits (Parus major) assess males by eavesdropping? A field study using interactive song playback.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: Series B,266, 1305–1309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Penn, D. J. (2002). The scent of genetic compatibility: Sexual selection and the MHC.Ethology,108, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Persaud, K. N., &Galef, B. G., Jr. (2003). Female Japanese quail aggregate to avoid sexual harassment by conspecific males: A possible cause of conspecific cueing.Animal Behaviour,65, 89–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Pruett-Jones, S. (1992). Independent versus nonindependent mate choice: Do females copy each other?American Naturalist,140, 1000–1009.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Real, L. (1991). Search theory and mate choice. II. Mutual interaction, assortative mating, and equilibrium variation in male and female fitness.American Naturalist,138, 901–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Reynolds, J. D., Gross, M. R., &Coombs, M. J. (1993). Environmental conditions and male morphology determine alternative mating behaviour in Trinidadian guppies.Animal Behaviour,45, 145–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Riebel, K. (2000). Early exposure leads to repeatable preferences for male song in female zebra finches.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: Series B,267, 2553–2558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Roitberg, B. D., Sircom, J., Roitberg, C. A., Van Alphen, J. J. M., &Mangel, M. (1983). Life expectancy and reproduction.Nature,364, 108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Ruscio, M. G., &Adkins-Regan, E. (2003). Effect of female brooding on male mate choice in Japanese quail,Coturnix japonica.Animal Behaviour,65, 397–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Schlupp, I.,Marler, C., &Ryan, M. J. (1994). Benefit to male sailfin mollies of mating with heterospecific females.Science. 373–374.Google Scholar
  84. Schwagmeyer, P. L., &Mock, D. W. (2003). How consistently are good parents good parents? Repeatability of parental care in the house sparrow,Passer domesticus.Ethology,109, 303–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Servedio, M.R., &Kirkpatrick, M. (1996). The evolution of mate choice copying by indirect selection.American Naturalist,148, 848–867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Shuster, S.M., &Wade, M. J. (1991). Female copying and sexual selection in a marine isopod crustaceanParacerceis sculpta.Animal Behaviour,41, 1071–1078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Sirot, E. (2001). Mate-choice copying by females: The advantages of a prudent strategy.Journal of Evolutionary Biology,14, 418–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Slagsvold, T., Hansen, B. T., Johannessen, L. E., &Lifjeld, J. T. (2002). Mate choice and imprinting in birds studied by cross-fostering in the wild.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: Series B,269, 1449–1455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Slagsvold, T., &Viljugrein, H. (1999). Mate choice copying versus preference for actively displaying males by female pied flycatchers.Animal Behaviour,57, 679–686.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Stšhr, S. (1998). Evolution of mate choice copying: A dynamic model.Animal Behaviour,55, 893–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Sullivan, M. S. (1994). Mate choice as an information gathering process under a time constraint: Implications for behavior and signal design.Animal Behaviour,47, 141–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Thornhill, R. (1976). Sexual selection and nuptial feeding behavior inBittacus apicalis (Insecta: Mecoptera).American Naturalist,110, 529–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.),Sexual selection and the descent of man 1871–1971 (pp. 136–179). Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  94. Vinnedge, B., &Verrell, P. (1998). Variance in male mating success and female choice for persuasive courtship displays.Animal Behaviour,56, 443–448.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Wade, M. J., &Pruett-Jones, S. G. (1990). Female copying increases the variance in male mating success.Proceedings of the National Academy of Science,87, 5749–5753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Wagner, R. H., &Danchin, E. (2003). Conspecific copying: A general mechanism of social aggregation.Animal Behaviour,65, 405–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Wagner, W. E., Jr. (1998). Measuring female mating preferences.Animal Behaviour,55, 1029–1042.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. West, M. J., &King, A. P. (1988). Female visual displays affect the development of male song in the cowbird.Nature,334, 244–246.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. West-Eberhard, M. J. (1983). Sexual selection, social competition, and speciation.Quarterly Review of Biology,58, 155–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Westneat, D. F., Walters, A., McCarthy, T. M., Hatch, M. I., &Hein, W. K. (2000). Alternative mechanisms of nonindependent mate choice.Animal Behaviour,59, 467–476.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. White, D. J., &Galef, B. G., Jr. (1999a). Affiliative preferences are stable and predict mate choices in both sexes of Japanese quail,Coturnix japonica.Animal Behaviour,58, 865–871.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. White, D. J., &Galef, B. G., Jr. (1999b). Mate-choice copying and conspecific cueing in Japanese quail,Coturnix coturnix japonica.Animal Behaviour,57, 465–473.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. White, D. J., &Galef, B. G., Jr. (1999c). Social effects on mate choices of male Japanese quail,Coturnix japonica.Animal Behaviour,57, 1005–1012.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. White, D. J., &Galef, B. G., Jr. (2000a). Culture in quail: Social influences on mate choices of femaleCoturnix japonica.Animal Behaviour,59, 975–979.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. White, D. J., &Galef, B. G., Jr. (2000b). Differences between the sexes in the direction and duration of response to seeing a potential sex partner mate with another.Animal Behaviour,59, 1235–1240.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. White, D. J., King, A. P., &West, M. J. (2002). Facultative development of courtship and communication skills in juvenile male cowbirds,Molothrus ater.Behavioral Ecology,23, 487–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Wiegman, D. D., Real, L. A., Capone, T. A., &Ellner, S. (1996). Some distinguishing features of models of search behavior and mate choice.American Naturalist,147, 188–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Witte, K., &Ryan, M. [J.] (1998). Male body length influences matechoice copying in the sailf in mollyPoecilia latipinna.Behavioral Ecology,9, 534–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Indiana UniversityBloomington

Personalised recommendations