Abstract
The termsconditioned taste avoidance andconditioned taste aversion are often used interchangeably in the literature; however, considerable evidence indicates that they may represent different processes. Conditioned taste avoidance is measured by the amount that a rat consumes in a consumption test that includes both appetitive phases and consummatory phases of responding. However, conditioned taste aversion is more directly assessed with the taste reactivity test, which includes only the consummatory phase of responding. Rats display a conditioned taste aversion as conditioned rejection reactions (gapes, chin rubs, and paw treads) during an intraoral infusion of a nausea-paired flavored solution. Treatments that produce nausea are not necessary for the establishment of taste avoidance, but they are necessary for the establishment of taste aversion. Furthermore, treatments that alleviate nausea modulate neither the establishment nor the expression of taste avoidance, but they interfere with both the establishment and the expression of taste aversion. Considerable evidence exists indicating that these two measures are independent of one another. Taste avoidance may be motivated by conditioned fear rather than conditioned nausea, but taste aversion (as reflected by rejection reactions) may be motivated by conditioned nausea.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Balleine, B. W., Garner, C., &Dickinson, A. (1995). Instrumental outcome devaluation is attenuated by the anti-emetic ondansetron.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,48B, 235–251.
Barr, G. A., Paredes, W., &Bridger, W. H. (1985). Place conditioning with morphine and phencyclidine: Dose dependent effects.Life Sciences,36, 363–368.
Beach, H. D. (1957). Morphine addiction in rats.Canadian Journal of Psychology,11, 105–112.
Berger, B. D. (1972). Conditioning of food aversions by injections of psychoactive drugs.Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology,81, 21–26.
Berridge, K. C., Grill, H. J., &Norgren, R. (1981). Relation of consummatory responses and preabsorptive insulin release to palatability and learned taste aversions.Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology,95, 363–382.
Best, M., Best, P., &Mickley, G. (1973). Conditioned aversion to distinct environmental stimuli resulting from gastrointestinal distress.Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology,85, 250–257.
Bisogno, T., Hanus, L., De Petrocellis, L., Tchilibon, S., Ponde, D. E., Brandi, I., Moriello, A. S., Davis, J. B., Mechoulam, R., &Di Marzo, V. (2001). Molecular targets for cannabidiol and its synthetic analogues: Effect on vanilloid VR1 receptors and on the cellular uptake and enzymatic hydrolysis of anandamide.British Journal of Pharmacology,134, 845–852.
Blackshaw, L. A., &Grundy, D. (1993). Effects of 5-hydroxytryptamine on discharge of vagal mucosal afferent fibres from the upper gastrointestinal tract of the ferret.Journal of the Autonomic Nervous System,45, 41–50.
Bossert, J. M., &Franklin, K. B. (2001). Pentobarbital-induced place preference in rats is blocked by GABA, dopamine and opioid antagonists.Psychopharmacology,157, 115–122.
Coil, J. D., Hankins, W. G., Jenden, D. J., &Garcia, J. (1978). The attenuation of a specific cue-to-consequence association by antiemetic agents.Psychopharmacology,56, 21–25.
Cordick, N., Parker, L. A., &Ossenkopp, K. P. (1999). Rotation-induced conditioned rejection in the taste reactivity test.NeuroReport,10, 1157–1159.
Costello, N. L., Carlson, J. N., Glick, S. D., &Bryda, M. (1989). Dose-dependent and baseline-dependent conditioning withdamphetamine in the place conditioning paradigm.Psychopharmacology,99, 244–247.
Cromwell, H. C., &Berridge, K. C. (1993). Where does damage lead to enhanced food aversion: The ventral pallidum/substantia innominata or lateral hypothalamus?Brain Research,624, 1–110.
Cubero, I., Thiele, T. E., &Bernstein, I. L. (1999). Insular cortex lesions and taste aversion learning: Effects of conditioning method and timing of lesion.Brain Research,839, 323–330.
Cunningham, C. L. (1979). Flavor and location aversions produced by ethanol.Behavioral & Neural Biology,27, 362–367.
Cunningham, C. L., &Noble, D. (1992). Methamphetamine-induced conditioned place preference or aversion depending on dose and presence of drug. In P. B. Kalivas & H. W. Samson (Eds.),The neurobiology of drug and alcohol addiction (Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 654, pp. 431–433). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
Davies, A. M., &Parker, L. A. (1993). Fenfluramine-induced place aversion in a three-choice apparatus.Pharmacology, Biochemistry & Behavior,44, 595–600.
Davies, B. T., &Parker, L. A. (1990). Novel versus familiar ethanol: A comparison of aversive and rewarding properties.Alcohol,7, 523–529.
Davis, C. J., Harding, R. K., Leslie, R. A., &Andrews, P. L. R. (1986). The organisation of vomiting as a protective reflex. In C. J. Davis, G. V. Lake-Bakaar, & D. G. Grahame-Smith (Eds.),Nausea and vomiting: Mechanisms and treatment (pp. 65–75). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Domjan, M. (1998).The principles of learning and behavior (4th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Gadusek, F. J., &Kalat, J. W. (1975). Effects of scopolamine on retention of taste-aversion learning in rats.Physiological Psychology,3, 130–132.
Gamzu, E. (1977). The multifaceted nature of taste aversion inducing agents: Is there a single common factor? In L. Barker, M. Domjan, & M. Best (Eds.),Learning mechanisms of food selection (pp. 447–511). Waco, TX: Baylor University Press.
Garcia, J. (1989). Food for Tolman: Cognition and cathexis in concert. In T. Archer & L.-G. Nilsson (Eds.),Aversion, avoidance and anxiety (pp. 45–85). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Garcia, J., Hankins, W. G., &Rusiniak, K. W. (1974). Behavioral regulation of the milieu interne in man and rat.Science,185, 824–831.
Garcia, J., &Koelling, R. A. (1966). Relation of cue to consequence in avoidance learning.Psychonomic Science,4, 123–124.
Goudie, A. J., Stolerman, I. P., Demellweek, C., &D’Mello, G. D. (1982). Does conditioned nausea mediate drug-induced conditioned taste aversion?Psychopharmacology,78, 277–282.
Grant, V. L. (1987). Do conditioned taste aversions result from activation of emetic mechanisms?Psychopharmacology,93, 405–415.
Grigson, P. S. (1997). Conditioned taste aversions and drugs of abuse: A reinterpretation.Behavioral Neuroscience,111, 129–136.
Grill, H. C., &Norgren, R. (1978). The taste reactivity test: I. Mimetic responses to gustatory stimuli in neurologically normal rats.Brain Research,143, 263–279.
Grundy, D. (1998, June).Visceral afferents and their modulation in animal models of nausea and vomiting. Paper presented at the International Symposium on Nausea and Vomiting: A multidisciplinary approach. Tutzing, Germany.
Higgins, G. A., Kilpatrick, G. J., Bunce, K. T., Jones, B. J., &Tyers, M. B. (1989). 5-HT3 receptor antagonists injected into the area postrema inhibit cisplatin-induced emesis in the ferret.British Journal of Pharmacology,97, 247–255.
Hunt, T., &Amit, Z. (1987). Conditioned taste aversion induced by self-administered drugs: Paradox revisited.Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews,11, 107–130.
Jorenby, D. E., Steinpreis, R. E., Sherman, J. E., &Baker, T. B. (1990). Aversion instead of preference learning indicated by nicotine place conditioning in rats.Psychopharmacology,101, 533–538.
Konorski, J. (1967).Integrative activity of the brain: An interdisciplinary approach. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Levy, C. J., Carroll, M. E., Smith, J. C., &Hofer, K. G. (1974). Antihistamines block radiation-induced taste aversions.Science,186, 1044–1045.
Lew, G., &Parker, L. A. (1998). Pentobarbital-induced place aversion learning.Animal Learning & Behavior,26, 219–224.
Limebeer, C. L., &Parker, L. A. (1999). Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol interferes with the establishment and the expression of conditioned rejection reactions produced by cyclophosphamide: A rat model of nausea.NeuroReport,10, 3769–3772.
Limebeer, C. L., &Parker, L. A. (2000). Ondansetron interferes with lithium-induced conditioned rejection reactions, but not lithiuminduced taste avoidance.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,26, 371–384.
Malfait, A. M., Gallily, R., Sumariwalla, P. F., Malik, A. S., Andreakos, E., Mechoulam, R., &Feldmann, M. (2000). The nonpsychoactive cannabis constituent cannabidiol is an oral antiarthritic therapeutic in murine collagen-induced arthritis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,97, 9561–9566.
Mallet, P. E., &Beninger, R. J. (1998). D-9-tetrahydrocannabinol, but not the endogenous cannabinoid receptor ligand anandamide, produces conditioned place avoidance.Life Sciences,62, 2431–2439.
Martin-Iverson, M. T., Ortmann, R., &Fibiger, H. C. (1985). Place preference conditioning with methylphenidate and nomifensine.Brain Research,332, 59–67.
Mayer, L. A., &Parker, L. A. (1993). Rewarding and aversive properties of IP versus SC cocaine: Assessment by place and taste conditioning.Psychopharmacology,112, 189–194.
MCDonald, R. V., Parker, L. A., &Siegel, S. (1997). Conditioned sucrose aversions produced by naloxone-precipitated withdrawal from acutely administered morphine.Pharmacology, Biochemistry & Behavior,58, 1003–1007.
Mechoulam, R. (1970). Marihuana chemistry.Science,168, 1159–1163.
Mucha, R. F., van der Kooy, D., O’Shaughnessy, M., &Bucenieks, P. (1982). Drug reinforcement studied by the use of place conditioning in the rat.Brain Research,243, 91–105.
Ossenkopp, K.-P., Parker, L. A., Limebeer, C. L., Burton, P., Fudge, M. L., &Cross-Mellor, S. K. (2003). Vestibular lesions selectively abolish rotation-induced, but not lithium-induced, conditioned taste aversions (oral rejection responses) in rats.Behavioral Neuroscience,117, 105–114.
Parker, L. A. (1982). Nonconsummatory and consummatory behavioral CRs elicited by lithium- and amphetamine-paired flavors.Learning & Motivation,13, 281–303.
Parker, L. A. (1984). Behavioral conditioned responses across multiple conditioning/testing trials elicited by lithium- and amphetamine-paired flavors.Behavioral & Neural Biology,41, 190–199.
Parker, L. A. (1988). Positively reinforcing drugs may produce a different kind of CTA than drugs which are not positively reinforcing.Learning & Motivation,19, 207–220.
Parker, L. A. (1991). Taste reactivity responses elicited by reinforcing drugs: A dose-response analysis.Behavioral Neuroscience,105, 955–964.
Parker, L. A. (1992). Place conditioning in a three- or four-choice apparatus: Role of stimulus novelty in drug-induced place conditioning.Behavioral Neuroscience,106, 294–307.
Parker, L. A. (1993). Taste reactivity responses elicited by cocaine-, phencyclidine-, and methamphetamine-paired sucrose solutions.Behavioral Neuroscience,107, 118–129.
Parker, L. A. (1995). Rewarding drugs produce taste avoidance, but not taste aversion.Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews,19, 143–151.
Parker, L. A. (1996). LSD produces a place preference and taste avoidance, but does not produce taste aversion.Behavioral Neuroscience,109, 503–508.
Parker, L. A. (1998). Emetic drugs produce conditioned rejection reactions in the taste reactivity test.Journal of Psychophysiology,12, 3–13.
Parker, L. A., &Brosseau, L. (1990). Apomorphine-induced flavordrug associations: A dose-response analysis by the taste reactivity test and the conditioned taste avoidance test.Pharmacology, Biochemistry & Behavior,35, 583–587.
Parker, L. A., Corrick, M. L., Limebeer, C. L., &Kwiatkowska, M. (2002). Amphetamine and morphine produce a conditioned taste and place preference in the house musk shrew (Suncus murinus).Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,28, 75–82.
Parker, L. A., &Gillies, T. (1995). THC-induced place and taste aversions in Lewis and Sprague-Dawley rats.Behavioral Neuroscience,109, 71–78.
Parker, L. A., &Joshi, A. (1998). Naloxone-precipitated morphine withdrawal induced place aversion: Effects of naloxone at 24 hours postmorphine.Pharmacology, Biochemistry & Behavior,61, 331–333.
Parker, L. A., Limebeer, C., &Simpson, G. (1998). Chlordiazepoxideinduced conditioned place and taste aversion learning in rats.Pharmacology, Biochemistry & Behavior,59, 33–37.
Parker, L. A., &MCLeod, K. B. (1991). Chin rub CRs may reflect conditioned sickness elicited by a lithium-paired sucrose solution.Pharmacology, Biochemistry & Behavior,40, 983–986.
Parker, L. A., Mechoulam, R., &Schlievert, C. (2002). Cannabidiol, a non-psychoactive component of cannabis, and its synthetic dimethylheptyl homolog suppress nausea in an experimental model with rats.NeuroReport,13, 567–570.
Parker, L. A., Mechoulam, R., Schlievert, C., Abbott, L. A., Fudge, M. L., &Burton, P. (2003). Cannabinoid agonists attenuate and a cannabinoid antagonist potentiates lithium-induced conditioned rejection reactions in a rat model of nausea.Psychopharmacology,166, 156–162.
Parker, L. A., &Rennie, M. (1992). Naltrexone-induced aversions: Assessment by the place conditioning taste reactivity and taste avoidance paradigms.Pharmacology, Biochemistry & Behavior,41, 559–565.
Pelchat, M. L., Grill, H. J., Rozin, P., &Jacobs, J. (1983). Quality of acquired responses to tastes byRattus norvegicus depends on type of associated discomfort.Journal of Comparative Psychology,97, 140–153.
Pelchat, M. L., &Rozin, P. (1982). The special role of nausea in the acquisition of food dislikes by humans.Appetite,3, 341–355.
Rabin, B. M., &Hunt, W. A. (1983). Effects of antiemetics on the acquisition and recall of radiation and lithium chloride induced conditioned taste aversions.Pharmacology, Biochemistry & Behavior,18, 629–636.
Reicher, M. A., &Holman, E. W. (1977). Location preference and flavor aversion reinforced by amphetamine in rats.Animal Learning & Behavior,5, 343–346.
Reid, L. D., Hunter, G. A., Beaman, C. M., &Hubbel, C. L. (1985). Toward understanding ethanol’s capacity to be reinforcing: A conditioned place preference following injections of ethanol.Pharmacology, Biochemistry & Behavior,22, 483–487.
Robinson, T. E., &Berridge, K. C. (1993). The neural basis of drug craving: An incentive-sensitization theory of addiction.Brain Research Reviews,18, 247–291.
Rudd, J. A., Ngan, M. P., &Wai, M. K. (1998). 5-HT3 receptors are not involved in conditioned taste aversions induced by 5-hydroxytryptamine, ipecacuanha or cisplatin.European Journal of Pharmacology,352, 143–149.
Schafe, G. E., Thiele, T. E., &Bernstein, I. L. (1998). Conditioning method dramatically alters the role of amygdala in taste aversion learning.Learning & Memory,5, 481–492.
Schwartz, M. D., Jacobsen, P. B., &Bjovberg, D. H. (1996). Role of nausea in the development of aversions to a beverage paired with chemotherapy treatment in cancer patients.Physiology & Behavior,59, 659–663.
Smith, J. E., Friedman, M. I., &Andrews, P. L. R. (2001). Conditioned food aversion inSuncus murinus (house musk shrew): A new model for the study of nausea in a species with an emetic reflex.Physiology & Behavior,73, 593–598.
Smith, R., &Parker, L. A. (1985). Chin rub CRs are elicited by flavors paired with apomorphine, physostigmine, neostigmine, scopolamine and methylscopolamine.Pharmacology, Biochemistry & Behavior,23, 583–589.
Travers, J. B., &Norgren, R. (1986). Electromyographic analysis of the ingestion and rejection of spid stimuli in the rat.Behavioral Neuroscience,100, 544–555.
Wise, R., Yokel, P., &DeWitt, H. (1976). Both positive reinforcement and conditioned aversion from amphetamine and from apomorphine in rats.Science,191, 1273–1274.
Zalaquett, C., &Parker, L. A. (1989). Further evidence that CTAs produced lithium and amphetamine are qualitatively different.Learning & Motivation,20, 413–427.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by Grant OGP-92057 from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada to L.A.P.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Parker, L.A. Taste avoidance and taste aversion: Evidence for two different processes. Learning & Behavior 31, 165–172 (2003). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195979
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195979