Abstract
The processing of two-constituent 12- to 18-letter Finnish compound nouns was studied by using an eye-movement-contingent display change technique. In the display change condition, all but the first 2 letters of the second constituent were replaced by visually similar letters until the eyes moved across an invisible boundary. When the eyes crossed the boundary, the second constituent was changed to its intended form. In the control condition, there was no display change. The frequency of the first constituent was also varied. The major findings were that (1) fixation time on the first constituent was strongly affected by the frequency of the first constituent but was not at all affected by whether the second constituent was visible, but (2) fixation time on the word subsequent to the first constituent’s having been left was strongly affected by the display change. These results are most parsimoniously explained by the serial access of the two constituents for these long compound words.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Altarriba, J., Kambe, G., Pollatsek, A., &Rayner, K. (2001). Semantic codes are not used in integrating information across eye fixations in reading: Evidence from fluent Spanish-English bilinguals.Perception & Psychophysics,63, 875–890.
Andrews, S., Miller, B., &Rayner, K. (2004). Eye movements and morphological segmentation of compound words: There is a mouse in mousetrap.European Journal of Cognitive Psychology,16, 285–311.
Balota, D. A., Pollatsek, A., &Rayner, K. (1985). The interaction of contextual constraints and parafoveal visual information in reading.Cognitive Psychology,17, 364–390.
Bertram, R., &Hyönä, J. (2003). The length of a complex word modifies the role of morphological structure: Evidence from reading short and long Finnish compounds.Journal of Memory & Language,48, 615–634.
Briihl, D., &Inhoff, A.W. (1995). Integrating information across fixations during reading: The use of orthographic bodies and exterior letters.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 55–67.
de Jong, N. H., Feldman, L. B., Schreuder, R., Pastizzo, M., &Baayen, R. H. (2002). The processing and representation of Dutch and English compounds: Peripheral morphological and central orthographic effects.Brain & Language,81, 555–567.
Deutsch, A., Frost, R., Pelleg, S., Pollatsek, A., &Rayner, K. (2003). Early morphological effects in reading: Evidence from parafoveal preview benefit in Hebrew.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,10, 415–422.
Ehrlich, S. F., &Rayner, K. (1981). Contextual effects on word perception and eye movements during reading.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,20, 641–655.
Henderson, J. M., &Ferreira, F. (1990). Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: Implications for attention and eye movement control.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 417–429.
Hyönä, J. (2003).Morphological preprocessing of first constituents of long compounds. Manuscript in preparation.
Hyönä, J., &Pollatsek, A. (1998). Reading Finnish compound words: Eye fixations are affected by component morphemes.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 1612–1627.
Hyönä, J., &Pollatsek, A. (2000). Morphological processing of Finnish compound words in reading. In A. Kennedy, R. Radach, D. Heller, & J. Pynte (Eds.),Reading as a perceptual process (pp. 65–87). Oxford: Elsevier.
Inhoff, A. W. (1989a). Lexical access during eye fixations in reading: Are word access codes used to integrate lexical information across interword fixations?Journal of Memory & Language,28, 444–461.
Inhoff, A. W. (1989b). Parafoveal processing of words and saccade computation during eye fixations in reading.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,15, 544–555.
Inhoff, A.W., Briihl, D., &Schwartz, J. (1996). Compound word effects differ in reading, on-line naming, and delayed naming tasks.Memory & Cognition,24, 466–476.
Inhoff, A. W., Radach, R., &Heller, D. (2000). Complex compounds in German: Interword spaces facilitate segmentation but hinder assignment of meaning.Journal of Memory & Language,42, 23–50.
Inhoff, A.W., Starr, M., &Shindler, K. L. (2000). Is the processing of words during eye fixations in reading strictly serial?Perception & Psychophysics,62, 1474–1484.
Juhasz, B. J., Starr, M. S., Inhoff, A. W., &Placke, L. (2003). The effects of morphology on the processing of compound words: Evidence from naming, lexical decisions and eye fixations.British Journal of Psychology,94, 223–244.
Kennedy, A., Pynte, J., &Ducrot, S. (2002). Parafoveal-on-foveal interactions in word recognition.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,55A, 1307–1337.
Kennison, S. M., &Clifton.C. (1995). Determinants of parafoveal preview benefit in high and low working memory capacity readers: Implications for eye movement control.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 68–81.
Laine, M., &Virtanen, P. (1999).WordMill Lexical Search Program. Turku, Finland: University of Turku, Center for Cognitive Neuroscience.
Lima, S. D. (1987). Morphological analysis in sentence reading.Journal of Memory & Language,26, 84–99.
Moscoso del Prado Martín, F., Bertram, R., Häikiö, T., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (in press). Morphological family size in a morphologically rich language: The case of Finnish compared to Dutch and Hebrew.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition.
Pollatsek, A., & Hyonä, J. (in press). The role of semantic transparency in the processing of Finnish compound words.Language & Cognitive Processes.
Pollatsek, A. Hyönä, J., &Bertram, R. (2000). The role of morphological constituents in reading Finnish compound words.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,26, 820–833.
Pollatsek, A., Lesch, M., Morris, R. K., &Rayner, K. (1992). Phonological codes are used in integrating information across saccades in word identification and reading.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,18, 148–162.
Rayner, K. (1975). The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading.Cognitive Psychology,7, 65–81.
Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research.Psychological Bulletin,124, 372–422.
Rayner, K., Balota, D. A., &Pollatsek, A. (1986). Against parafoveal semantic preprocessing during eye fixations in reading.Canadian Journal of Psychology,40, 473–483.
Rayner, K., &Pollatsek, A. (1989).The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Rayner, K., &Well, A. D. (1996). Effects of contextual constraint on eye movements in reading: A further examination.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,3, 504–509.
Rayner, K., White, S. J., Kambe, G., Miller, B., &Liversedge, S. P. (2003). On the processing of meaning from parafoveal vision during eye fixations in reading. In J. Hyönä, R. Radach, & H. Deubel (Eds.),The mind’s eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research (pp. 213–234). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
Reichle, E. D., Pollatsek, A., Fisher, D. L., &Rayner, K. (1998). Toward a model of eye movement control in reading.Psychological Review,105, 125–157.
Reichle, E. D., Rayner, K., &Pollatsek, A. (2003). The E-Z reader model of eye movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,26, 445–526.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by an Academy of Finland grant to the first author and by Grant HD26765 from the National Institutes of Health to the third author.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hyönä, J., Bertram, R. & Pollatsek, A. Are long compound words identified serially via their constituents? Evidence from an eyemovement-contingent display change study. Memory & Cognition 32, 523–532 (2004). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195844
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195844