Abstract
Studies of memories for the circumstances in which an emotional event was learned of have generally explored isolated, single-occurrence events—for example, the Kennedy assassination. Such factors as the event’s distinctiveness, its personal importance, its surprise, the elicited emotional change, and overt rehearsal have been posited as predictors of the memory’s vividness and elaborateness. We examined whether these predictor variables would apply to a repeated trauma, using the repeated nature of the trauma to test, in particular, the contribution of distinctiveness. Focusing on the multiple deaths of loved ones from AIDS that many gay men have experienced, we contrasted the vividness and elaborateness of the circumstantial memory of the first death encountered with that of the most recent death, treating distinctiveness as the number of intervening deaths. In an analysis of responses by 80 gay men to a survey, no support was found for the claim that distinctiveness predicts a circumstantial memory’s vividness or elaborateness. Only emotional change predicted these characteristics of the memories.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bell, A. P., &Weinberg, M. S. (1978).Homosexualities: A study of human diversity. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Bohannon, J. N., III (1988). Flashbulb memories for the space shuttle disaster: A tale of two theories.Cognition,29, 179–196.
Bohannon, J. N., III, &Symons, V. L. (1992). Flashbulb memories: Confidence, consistency, and quantity. In E. Winograd & U. Neisser (Eds.),Affect and accuracy in recall (pp. 65–90). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brown, R., &Kulik, J. (1977). Flashbulb memories.Cognition,5, 73–79.
Christianson, S.-Å. (1989). Flashbulb memories: Special, but not so special.Memory & Cognition,17, 435–443.
Christianson, S.-Å. (1992). Do flashbulb memories differ from other types of emotional memories? In E. Winograd & U. Neisser (Eds.),Affect and accuracy in recall (pp. 191–211). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Christianson, S.-Å, &Loftus, E. F. (1990). Some characteristics of people’s traumatic memories.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,28, 195–198.
Conway, M. A. (1995).Flashbulb memories. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Conway, M. A., Anderson, S. J., Larsen, S. F., Donnelly, C. M., McDaniel, M. A., McClelland, A. G. R., Rawles, R. E., &Logie, R. H. (1994). The formation of flashbulb memories.Memory & Cognition,22, 326–343.
Dean, L., Hall, W. E., &Martin, J. (1988). Chronic and intermittent AIDS: Related bereavement in a panel of homosexual men in New York City.Journal of Palliative Care,4, 54–57.
Dodson, C. S., &Schacter, D. L. (2002). When false recognition meets metacognition: The distinctiveness heuristic.Journal of Memory & Language,46, 782–803.
Finkenauer, C., Luminet, O., Gisle, L., El-Ahmadi, A., Van der Linden, M., &Philippot, P. (1998). Flashbulb memories and the underlying mechanisms of their formation: Toward an emotionalintegrative model.Memory & Cognition,26, 516–531.
Folkman, S. (1993). Psychosocial effects of HIV infection. In L. Goldberger & S. Breznitz (Eds. and Trans.),Handbook of stress (pp. 658–681). New York: Free Press.
Geraci, L., &Rajaram, S. (2002). The orthographic distinctiveness effect on direct and indirect tests of memory: Delineating the awareness and processing requirements.Journal of Memory & Language,47, 273–291.
Hunt, R. R., &Mitchell, D. B. (1982). Independent effects of semantic and nonsemantic distinctiveness.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,8, 81–87.
LeDoux, J. E. (2002).Synaptic self: How our brains become who we are. New York: Viking.
McCloskey, M., Wible, C. G., &Cohen, N. J. (1988). Is there a special flashbulb-memory mechanism?Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,117, 171–181.
Neisser, U. (1982). Snapshots or benchmarks? In U. Neisser (Ed.),Memory observed: Remembering in natural contexts (pp. 43–48). San Francisco: Freeman.
Neisser, U., &Harsch, N. (1992). Phantom flashbulbs: False recollections of hearing the news aboutChallenger. In E. Winograd & U. Neisser (Eds.),0Affect and accuracy in recall (pp. 9–31). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Neisser, U., Winograd, E., Bergman, E. T., Schreiber, C. A., Palmer, S. E., &Weldon, M. S. (1996). Remembering the earthquake: Direct experience vs. hearing the news.Memory,4, 337–357.
Odets, W. (1995).In the shadow of the epidemic: Being HIV-negative in the age of AIDS. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Pillemer, D. B. (1984). Flashbulb memories of the assassination attempt on President Reagan.Cognition,16, 63–80.
Reisberg, D., Heuer, F., McLean, J., &O’Shaughnessy, M. (1988). The quantity, not the quality, of affect predicts memory vividness.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,26, 100–103.
Rosaldo, R. (1993).Culture and truth: The remaking of social analysis. Boston: Beacon.
Rubin, D. C., &Kozin, M. (1984). Vivid memories.Cognition,16, 81–95.
Rubin, D. C., Rahhal, T. A., &Poon, L.W. (1998). Things learned in early adulthood are remembered best.Memory & Cognition,26, 3–19.
Schmolck, H., Buffalo, E. A., &Squire, L. R. (2000). Memory distortions developover time: Recollections of the O. J. Simpson trial verdict after 15 and 32 months.Psychological Science,11, 39–45.
Shilts, R. (1987).And the band played on. New York: St. Martin’s.
von Restorff, H. (1933). Über die Wirkung von Bereichsbildungen im Spurenfeld.Psychologische Forschung,18, 299–342.
Wallace, W. P. (1965). Review of the historical, empirical, and theoretical status of the von Restorff phenomenon.Psychological Bulletin,63, 410–424.
Winograd, E., &Killinger, W. A., Jr. (1983). Relating age at encoding in early childhood to adult recall: Development of flashbulb memories.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,112, 413–422.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mahmood, D., Manier, D. & Hirst, W. Memory for how one learned of multiple deaths from AIDS: Repeated exposure and distinctiveness. Memory & Cognition 32, 125–134 (2004). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195825
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195825