Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us Track your research
Search
Cart
  1. Home
  2. Memory & Cognition
  3. Article

Timing conditions and the magnitude of gender differences on the Mental Rotations Test

  • Published: January 2004
  • Volume 32, pages 72–82, (2004)
  • Cite this article
Download PDF
Memory & Cognition Aims and scope Submit manuscript
Timing conditions and the magnitude of gender differences on the Mental Rotations Test
Download PDF
  • Daniel Voyer3,
  • Marguerite A. Rodgers1 &
  • Peter A. McCormick2 
  • 1028 Accesses

  • 45 Citations

  • 39 Altmetric

  • 6 Mentions

  • Explore all metrics

Abstract

In two experiments, we examined the effect of timing conditions on the magnitude of gender differences in performance on the Mental Rotations Test (MRT). In Experiment 1, each of 196 females and 119 males was administered the MRT via a Microsoft PowerPoint presentation in one of five timing conditions (15, 20, 25, 30, and 40 sec). The participants were exposed to each MRT item for the period specified in the assigned timing condition. Experiment 2 was conducted to address flaws found in Experiment 1. Accordingly, each of 105 females and 105 males was individually administered the task in one of three timing conditions (15 sec, 25 sec, or unlimited duration). The results of both experiments showed that the magnitude of gender differences was similar across timing conditions when a conventional scoring method was used. An analysis of guessing behavior generally indicated that men tend to show little effect of timing conditions, whereas women’s propensity to guess increases when they are given more time to respond. In general, the results supported an interpretation of gender differences on the MRT that relies on the joint operation of performance factors and level of spatial ability.

Article PDF

Download to read the full article text

Similar content being viewed by others

Sex Differences in Mental Rotation Ability Are a Consequence of Procedure and Artificiality of Stimuli

Article 07 September 2017

Maryanne L. Fisher, Tami Meredith & Melissa Gray

Gender Differences in Spatial Ability: a Critical Review

Article 27 January 2023

Kristin A. Bartlett & Jorge D. Camba

Ability and sex differences in spatial thinking: What does the mental rotation test really measure?

Article 14 August 2017

Mary Hegarty

Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

References

  • Allen, M. J., &Hogeland, R. (1978). Spatial problem-solving strategies as functions of sex.Perceptual & Motor Skills,47, 348–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychological Association (1992). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct.American Psychologist,47, 1597–1611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baenninger, M., &Newcombe, N. (1989). The role of experience in spatial test performance: A meta-analysis.Sex Roles,20, 327–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, P. J., MacPherson, G.M., &Tobin, P. (1985). Do sex-related differences in spatial abilities exist? A multilevel critique with new data.American Psychologist,40, 786–799.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, S. A. (1989). Predictors of SAT mathematics scores of gifted male and gifted female adolescents.Psychology of Women Quarterly,13, 191–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, S. A., &Johnson, E. S. (1992). The effect of time limits on performance of mental rotations by gifted adolescents.Gifted Child Quarterly,36, 19–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, D., Haldane, D., &Mitchell, C. (1990). Sex differences in visual-spatial ability: The role of performance factors.Memory & Cognition,18, 546–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, E., &Meade, A. (1987). Developmental patterns of spatial ability: An early sex difference.Child Development,58, 725–740.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, J. (1971). Lateral specialization of the human brain: Behavioral manifestations and possible evolutionary basis. In J. A. Kiger, Jr. (Ed.),The biology of behavior (pp. 159–180). Corvallis: Oregon State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linn, M. C., &Petersen, A. C. (1985). Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis.Child Development,56, 1479–1498.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lohman, D. F. (1986). The effect of speed-accuracy tradeoff on sex differences in mental rotation.Perception & Psychophysics,39, 427–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masters, M. S. (1998). The gender difference on the Mental Rotations Test is not due to performance factors.Memory & Cognition,26, 444–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGee, M. G. (1979). Human spatial abilities: Psychometric studies and environmental, genetic, hormonal, and neurological influences.Psychological Bulletin,86, 889–911.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, M., Laeng, B., Latham, K., Johnson, M., Zaiyouna, R., &Richardson, C. (1995). A redrawn Vandenberg and Kuse Mental Rotations Test: Different versions and factors that affect performance.Brain & Cognition,28, 39–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, S. M. (1993). Sex differences in mental rotations: An effect of time limits?Brain & Cognition,21, 71–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, B., &Soares, M. P. (1986). Sexual maturation and spatial ability in college students.Developmental Psychology,22, 199–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. N., &Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects.Science,171, 701–703.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Signorella, M. L., &Jamison, W. (1986). Masculinity, femininity, androgyny, and cognitive performance: A meta-analysis.Psychological Bulletin,100, 207–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stumpf, H. (1998). Gender-related differences in academically talented students’ scores and use of time on tests of spatial ability.Gifted Child Quarterly,42, 157–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, B. G., &Fidell, L. S. (1996).Using multivariate statistics (3rd ed.). New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandenberg, S. G. (1985).Answer Key for Mental Rotations Test. Boulder: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandenberg, S. G., &Kuse, A. R. (1978). Mental Rotation, a group test of three-dimensional spatial visualization.Perceptual & Motor Skills,47, 599–604.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voyer, D. (1997). Scoring procedure, performance factors, and magnitude of sex differences in spatial performance.American Journal of Psychology,110, 259–276.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Voyer, D., Voyer, S., &Bryden, M. P. (1995). Magnitude of gender differences in spatial abilities: A meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables.Psychological Bulletin,117, 250–271.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Waber, D. P. (1976). Sex differences in cognition: A function of maturation rate?Science,192, 572–574.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

    Marguerite A. Rodgers

  2. St. Francis Xavier University, Antigonish, Nova Scotia, Canada

    Peter A. McCormick

  3. Department of Psychology, University of New Brunswick, Bag Service #45444, E3B 6E4, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada

    Daniel Voyer

Authors
  1. Daniel Voyer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marguerite A. Rodgers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Peter A. McCormick
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Voyer.

Additional information

The study reported in this article was supported by grants from the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada to D.V. and P.A.M.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Voyer, D., Rodgers, M.A. & McCormick, P.A. Timing conditions and the magnitude of gender differences on the Mental Rotations Test. Memory & Cognition 32, 72–82 (2004). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195821

Download citation

  • Received: 30 May 2002

  • Accepted: 15 August 2003

  • Issue Date: January 2004

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195821

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Gender Difference
  • Mental Rotation
  • Performance Factor
  • Correct Choice
  • Spatial Ability
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

Advertisement

search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z

Publish with us

  • Publish your research
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our imprints

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support

95.216.99.153

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2024 Springer Nature