Abstract
Generating stimuli at encoding typically improves memory for occurrence (item memory) but might disrupt memory for order. In three experiments, the relationship between generation and order memory was examined by using familiar stimuli, which give rise to the standard generation advantage in item memory, and unfamiliar stimuli, which do not. The participants generated or read words and nonwords in Experiments 1 and 2 and familiar and unfamiliar word compounds in Experiment 3. For the familiar stimuli, generation enhanced item memory (as measured by recognition) but disrupted performance on the order-reconstruction test. For the unfamiliar stimuli, generation produced no recognition advantage and yet persisted in disrupting order reconstruction. Thus, the positive effects of generation on item memory were dissociated from its negative impact on order memory
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Asch, S. E., &Ebenholtz, S. M. (1962). The process of free recall: Evidence for nonassociative factors in acquisition and retention.Journal of Psychology,54, 3–31.
Auble, P. M., &Franks, J. J. (1978). The effects of effort toward comprehension on recall.Memory & Cognition,6, 20–25.
Burns, D. J. (1992). The consequences of generation.Journal of Memory & Language,31, 615–633.
Burns, D. J. (1996). The item-order distinction and the generation effect: The importance of order information in long-term memory.American Journal of Psychology,109, 567–580.
Burns, D. J., Curti, E. T., &Lavin, J. C. (1993). The effects of generation on item and order retention in immediate and delayed recall.Memory & Cognition,21, 846–852.
Cohen, J. (1988).Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
DeLosh, E. L., &McDaniel, M. A. (1996). The role of order information in free recall: Application to the word-frequency effect.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,22, 1136–1146.
DeWinstanley, P. A., Bjork, E. L., &Bjork, R. A. (1996). Generation effects and the lack thereof: The role of transfer-appropriate processing.Memory,4, 31–48.
Engelkamp, J., &Dehn, D. A. (2000). Item and order information in subject-performed tasks and experimenter-performed tasks.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 671–682.
Engelkamp, J., &Zimmer, H. D. (1994).The human memory: A multimodal approach. Seattle: Hogrefe & Huber.
Gardiner, J. M., Gregg, V. H., &Hampton, J. A. (1988). Word frequency and generation effects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,14, 687–693.
Gardiner, J. M., &Hampton, J. A. (1985). Semantic memory and the generation effect: Some tests of the lexical activation hypothesis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,11, 732–741.
Greene, R. L. (1992).Human memory: Paradigms and paradoxes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Greene, R. L., Thapar, A., &Westerman, D. L. (1998). Effects of generation on memory for order.Journal of Memory & Language,38, 255–264.
Hirshman, E., &Bjork, R. A. (1988). The generation effect: Support for a two-factor theory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,14, 484–494.
Hirshman, E., &Mulligan, N. W. (1991). Perceptual interference improves explicit memory but does not enhance data-driven processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 507–513.
Hirshman, E., Trembath, D., &Mulligan, N. W. (1994). Theoretical implications of the mnemonic benefits of perceptual interference.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 608–620.
Hunt, R. R., &McDaniel, M. A. (1993). The enigma of organization and distinctiveness.Journal of Memory & Language,32, 421–445.
Inhoff, A. W., Briihl, D., &Schwartz, J. (1996). Compound word effects differ in reading, on-line naming, and delayed naming tasks.Memory & Cognition,24, 466–476.
Johns, E. E., &Swanson, L. C. (1988). The generation effect with nonwords.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,14, 180–190.
Kelley, M. R., &Nairne, J. S. (2001). von Restorff revisited: Isolation, generation, and memory for order. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,27, 54–66.
Kinoshita, S. (1989). Generation enhances semantic processing? The role of distinctiveness in the generation effect.Memory & Cognition,17, 563–571.
KuČera, H., &Francis, W. N. (1967).Computational analysis of presentday American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
Masson, M. E. J., &MacLeod, C. M. (1992). Reenacting the route to interpretation: Enhanced perceptual identification without prior perception.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,121, 145–176.
Masson, M. E. J., &MacLeod, C. M. (1997). Episodic enhancement of processing fluency. In D. L. Medin (Ed.),The psychology of learning and memory (Vol. 37, pp. 155–210). San Diego: Academic Press.
McDaniel, M. A., DeLosh, E. L., &Merritt, P. S. (2000). Order information and retrieval distinctiveness: Recall of common versus bizarre material.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 1045–1056.
McDaniel, M. A., Einstein, G. O., DeLosh, E. L., May, C. P., &Brady, P. (1995). The bizarreness effect: It’s not surprising, it’s complex.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 422–435.
McDaniel, M. A., Wadill, P. J., &Einstein, G. O. (1988). A contextual account of the generation effect: A three-factor theory.Journal of Memory & Language,27, 521–536.
McElroy, L. A., &Slamecka, N. J. (1982). Memorial consequences of generating nonwords: Implications for semantic-memory interpretations of the generation effect.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,21, 243–259.
Mulligan, N. W. (1996). The effects of perceptual interference at encoding on implicit memory, explicit memory, and memory for source.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,22, 1067–1087.
Mulligan, N. W. (1998). Perceptual interference at encoding enhances recall for high- but not low-imageability words.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,5, 464–469.
Mulligan, N. W. (1999). The effects of perceptual interference at encoding on organization and order: Investigating the roles of itemspecific and relational information.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,25, 54–69.
Mulligan, N. W. (2000a). Perceptual interference and memory for order.Journal Memory & Language,43, 680–697.
Mulligan, N. W. (2000b). Perceptual interference at encoding enhances item-specif ic encoding and disrupts relational encoding: Evidence from multiple recall tests.Memory & Cognition,28, 539–546.
Mulligan, N. W. (2001a). Generation and hypermnesia.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,27, 436–450.
Mulligan, N. W. (2001b). Word frequency and memory: Effects on absolute versus relative order memory and on item memory versus order memory.Memory & Cognition,29, 977–985.
Nairne, J. S. (1988). The mnemonic value of perceptual identification.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,14, 244–255.
Nairne, J. S., Pusen, C., &Widner, R. L. Jr. (1985). Representation in the mental lexicon: Implications for theories of the generation effect.Memory & Cognition,13, 183–191.
Nairne, J. S., Reigler, G. L., &Serra, M. (1991). Dissociative effects of generation on item and order retention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 702–709.
Nairne, J. S., &Widner, R. L. (1987). Generation effects with nonwords: The role of test appropriateness.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,13, 164–171.
Payne, D. G., Neely, J. H., &Burns, D. J. (1986). The generation effect: Further tests of the lexical activation hypothesis.Memory & Cognition,14, 246–252.
Reinitz, M. T., &Demb, J. B. (1994). Implicit and explicit memory for compound words.Memory & Cognition,22, 687–694.
Serra, M., &Nairne, J. S. (1993). Design controversies and the generation effect: Support for an item-order hypothesis.Memory & Cognition,21, 34–40.
Slamecka, N. J., &Graf, P. (1978). The generation effect: Delineation of a phenomenon.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,4, 592–604.
Slamecka, N. J., &Katsaiti, L. T. (1987). The generation effect as an artifact of selective displaced rehearsal.Journal of Memory & Language,26, 589–607.
Steffens, M. C., &Erdfelder, E. (1998). Determinants of positive and negative generation effects in free recall.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,51A, 705–733.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was partially supported by Grant 1-R03-MH61324-01 from NIMH.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mulligan, N.W. The generation effect: Dissociating enhanced item memory and disrupted order memory. Memory & Cognition 30, 850–861 (2002). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195771
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195771