Abstract
This article reexamines the theory and data concerning two opposing views of episodic association. The independent association hypothesis (IAH) sees associations as unidirectional and separately modifiable links between individual item representations. The associative symmetry hypothesis (ASH) sees an association as a holistic conjunction of the constituent items, blending the elements of their representations into a new one. In early tests of these hypotheses, experimenters compared forward and backward recall of paired associates, looking for asymmetries. Although some studies showed significant differences between forward and backward recall, the vast majority did not. The author of this study used a mathematical analysis of distributed memory models to reexamine this classic question. These analyses revealed that symmetric and asymmetric models can mimic each other, offering identical predictions regarding forward and backward recall. To distinguish these models, the author examined the correlation between forward and backward recall at the level of individual pairs of items. Both this correlation and the correlation between recall of pairs tested in the same direction were near unity. These results provide new evidence favoring the ASH over the IAH.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, J. A., Silverstein, J. W., Ritz, S. A., &Jones, R. S. (1977). Distinctive features, categorical perception, and probability learning: Some applications of a neural model.Psychological Review,84, 413–451.
Asch, S. E. (1968). The doctrinal tyranny of associationism: Or what is wrong with rote learning. In T. R. Dixon & D. L. Horton (Eds.),Verbal behavior and general behavior theory (pp. 214–228). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Asch, S. E., &Ebenholtz, S. M. (1962). The principle of associative symmetry.Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society,106, 135–163.
Bartling, C. A., &Thompson, P. (1977). Encoding specificity: Retrieval asymmetry in the recognition failure paradigm.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,3, 690–700.
Begg, I. (1979). Trace loss and the recognition failure of unrecalled words.Memory & Cognition,7, 113–123.
Bishop, Y. M. M., Fienberg, S. E., &Holland, P. W. (1975).Discrete multivariate analysis: Theory and practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Brown, D. A., Dalloz, P., &Hulme, C. (1995). Mathematical and connectionist models of human memory: A comparison.Memory,2, 113–145.
Brown, T. H., &Chattarji, S. (1995). Hebbian synaptic plasticity. In M. A. Arbib (Ed.),The handbook of brain theory and neural networks (pp. 454–459). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Buhmann, J., Divko, R., &Schulten, K. (1989). Associative memory with high information content.Physical Review A,39, 2689–2692.
Chappell, M., &Humphreys, M. S. (1994). An auto-associative neural network for sparse representations: Analysis and application to models of recognition and cued recall.Psychological Review,101, 103–128.
Cieutat, V. J., Stockwell, F. E., &Noble, C. E. (1958). The interaction of ability and amount of practice with stimulus and response meaningfulness (m, m’) in paired-associate learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology,56, 193–202.
Donnelly, R. E. (1988). Priming effects in successive episodic tests.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,14, 256–265.
Ebbinghaus, H. (1885/1913).Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology (H. A. Ruge & C. A. Bussenius, Trans.). New York: Teachers College, Columbia University. (Original work published 1885)
Ekstrand, B. R. (1966). Backward associations.Psychological Bulletin,65, 50–64.
Estes, W. K. (1960). Learning theory and the new “mental chemistry.”Psychological Review,67, 207–223.
Flexser, A. J. (1981). Homogenizing the 2 3 2 contingency table: A method for removing dependencies due to subject and item differences.Psychological Review,88, 327–339.
Friendly, M., Franklin, P. E., Hoffman, D., &Rubin, D. C. (1982). The Toronto Word Pool: Norms for imagery, concreteness, orthographic variables, and grammatical usage for 1,080 words.Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation,14, 375–399.
Gardiner, J. M., Gregg, V. H., &Hampton, J. A. (1988). Word frequency and generation effects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,14, 687–693.
Gillund, G., &Shiffrin, R. M. (1984). A retrieval model for both recognition and recall.Psychological Review,91, 1–67.
Greeno, J. G., James, C. T., &DaPolito, F. J. (1971). A cognitive interpretation of negative transfer and forgetting of paired associates.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,10, 331–345.
Hertz, J., Krogh, A., &Palmer, R. G. (1991).Introduction to the theory of neural computation. Redwood City, CA: Addison-Wesley.
Hintzman, D. (1987). Recognition and recall in MINERVA 2: Analysis of the “recognition-failure” paradigm. In P. Morris (Ed.),Modelling cognition (pp. 215–229). New York: Wiley.
Hopfield, J. J. (1982). Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,84, 8429–8433.
Horowitz, L. M., Brown, Z. M., &Weissbluth, S. (1964). Availability and the direction of associations.Journal of Experimental Psychology,68, 541–549.
Horowitz, L. M., Norman, S. A., &Day, R. S. (1966). Availability and associative symmetry.Psychological Review,73, 1–15.
Howard, M. W., &Kahana, M. J. (1999). Contextual variability and serial position effects in free recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,25, 923–941.
Howard, M. W., &Kahana, M. J. (2002). A distributed representation of temporal context.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,46, 269–299.
Humphreys, M. S., Bain, J. D., &Pike, R. (1989). Different ways to cue a coherent memory system: A theory for episodic, semantic, and procedural tasks.Psychological Review,96, 208–233.
Humphreys, M. S., &Bowyer, P. A. (1980). Sequential testing effects and the relationship between recognition and recognition failure.Memory & Cognition,8, 271–277.
Humphreys, M. S., Pike, R., Bain, J. D., &Tehan, G. (1989). Global matching: A comparison of the SAM, Minerva II, Matrix, and TODAM models.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,33, 36–67.
Jordan, M. I. (1986). An introduction to linear algebra in parallel distributed processing. In D. E. Rumelhart & J. L. McClelland (Eds.),Parallel distributed processing: Exploration in the microstructure of cognition. Vol 1: Foundations (pp. 365–422). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kahana, M. J. (1996). Associative retrieval processes in free recall.Memory & Cognition,24, 103–109.
Kahana, M. J. (2000). Contingency analyses of memory. In E. Tulving & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.),The Oxford handbook of human memory (pp. 323–384). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kahana, M. J., &Caplan, J. B. (2002). Associative asymmetry in probed recall of serial lists.Memory & Cognition,30, 841–849.
Kahana, M. J., Howard, M. W., Zaromb, F., &Wingfield, A. (2002). Age dissociates recency and lag-recency effects in free recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,28, 530–540.
Kahana, M. J., Rizzuto, D. S., & Schneider, A. (2002).An analysis of the recognition-recall relation in four distributed memory models. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Köhler, W. (1947).Gestalt psychology. New York: Liveright.
Levy, C. M., &Nevill, D. D. (1974). B-A learning as a function of degrees of A-B learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology,102, 327–329.
Lockhart, R. S. (1969). Retrieval asymmetry in the recall of adjectives and nouns.Journal of Experimental Psychology,79, 12–17.
Mandler, G. (1959). Stimulus variables and subject variables: A caution.Psychological Review,66, 145–149.
Mandler, G., Rabinowitz, J. C., &Simon, R. A. (1981). Coordinate organization: The holistic representation of word pairs.American Journal of Psychology,92, 209–222.
Martin, E. (1971). Verbal learning theory and independent retrieval phenomena.Psychological Review,78, 314–332.
Martin, E., &Greeno, J. G. (1972). Independence of associations tested.Psychological Review,79, 265–267.
McNaughton, B. L., &Morris, R. G. (1987). Hippocampal synaptic enhancement and information storage within a distributed memory system.Trends in Neurosciences,10, 408–415.
Metcalfe, J. (1985). Levels of processing, encoding specificity, elaboration, and CHARM.Psychological Review,92, 1–38.
Metcalfe, J. (1991). Recognition failure and the composite memory trace in CHARM.Psychological Review,98, 529–553.
Metcalfe, J. (1993). Novelty monitoring, metacognition, and control in a composite holographic associative recall model: Implications for Korsakoff amnesia.Psychological Review,100, 3–22.
Murdock, B. B. (1956). Backward learning in paired associates.Journal of Experimental Psychology,51, 213–215.
Murdock, B. B. (1962). The serial position effect of free recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology,64, 482–488.
Murdock, B. B. (1965). Associative symmetry and dichotic presentation.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,4, 222–226.
Murdock, B. B. (1966). Forward and backward associations in paired associates.Journal of Experimental Psychology,71, 732–737.
Murdock, B. B. (1979). Convolution and correlation in perception and memory. In L.-G. Nilsson (Ed.),Perspectives in memory research: Essays in honor of Uppsala University’s 500th anniversary (pp. 105–119). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Murdock, B. B. (1982). A theory for the storage and retrieval of item and associative information.Psychological Review,89, 609–626.
Murdock, B. B. (1985). Convolution and matrix systems: A reply to Pike.Psychological Review,92, 130–132.
Murdock, B. B. (1989). Learning in a distributed memory model. In C. Izawa (Ed.),Current issues in cognitive processes: The Floweree Symposium on Cognition (pp. 69–106). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Murdock, B. B. (1995). Similarity in a distributed memory model.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,39, 251–264.
Murdock, B. B. (1997). Context and mediators in a theory of distributed associative memory (TODAM2).Psychological Review,104, 839–862.
Nairne, J. S., &Widner, R. L. (1988). Familiarity and lexicality as determinants of the generation effect.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,14, 694–699.
Nilsson, L.-G., &Gardiner, J. M. (1993). Identifying exceptions in a database of recognition failure studies from 1973 to 1992.Memory & Cognition,21, 397–410.
Pike, R. (1984). Comparison of convolution and matrix distributed memory systems for associative recall and recognition.Psychological Review,91, 281–294.
Primoff, E. (1938). Backward and forward associations as an organizing act in serial and in paired-associate learning.Journal of Psychology,5, 375–395.
Raaijmakers, J. G. W., &Shiffrin, R. M. (1980). SAM: A theory of probabilistic search of associative memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 14, pp. 207–262). New York: Academic Press.
Rizzuto, D. S., &Kahana, M. J. (2001). An autoassociative model of paired associate learning.Neural Computation,13, 2075–2092.
Robinson, E. S. (1932).Association theory to-day; an essay in systematic psychology. New York: Century.
Rock, I. (1957). The role of repetition in associative learning.American Journal of Psychology,70, 186–193.
Rock, I., &Ceraso, J. (1964). Toward a cognitive theory of associative learning. In C. Scheerer (Ed.),Cognition: Theory, research and promise (pp. 110–146). New York: Harper & Row.
Slamecka, N. J. (1976). An analysis of double-function lists.Memory & Cognition,4, 581–585.
Treves, A., &Rolls, E. T. (1994). Computational analysis of the role of the hippocampus in memory.Hippocampus,4, 374–391.
Tulving, E. (1964). Intratrial and intertrial retention: Notes towards a theory of free recall verbal learning.Psychological Review,71, 219–237.
Tulving, E. (1983).Elements of episodic memory. New York: Oxford University Press.
Tulving, E., &Arbuckle, T. Y. (1966). Input and output interference in short-term associative memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology,72, 145–150.
Tulving, E., &Thompson, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory.Psychological Review,80, 352–373.
Tulving, E., &Wiseman, S. (1975). Relation between recognition and recognition failure of recallable words.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,6, 79–82.
Ward, G., & Woodward, G. (2002).Three factors that cause the word frequency effect in free recall. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Waugh, N. C. (1970). Associative symmetry and recall latencies: A distinction between learning and performance.Acta Psychologica,33, 326–337.
Weber, E. U. (1988). Expectation and variance of item resemblance distributions in a convolution-correlation model of distributed memory.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,32, 1–43.
Wolford, G. (1971). Function of distinct associations for paired-associate performance.Psychological Review,78, 303–313.
Wollen, K. A., Fox, R. A., &Lowry, D. H. (1970). Variations in asymmetry as a function of degree of forward learning.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,86, 416–419.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was funded by National Institutes of Health Grant MH55687 and by APA Grant 146 from the National Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada.
—Accepted by previous editorial team
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kahana, M.J. Associative symmetry and memory theory. Memory & Cognition 30, 823–840 (2002). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195769
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195769