Abstract
The tip-of-the-tongue state (TOT) is the phenomenological experience that a word is on the verge of being recalled. Participants rated TOTs as either emotional or nonemotional. In Experiment 1, given general-information questions, participants spent more time attempting retrieval during emotional TOTs than during nonemotional TOTs or n-TOTs (retrieval failures not accompanied by TOTs). Experiment 2 replicated the effect that TOTs show longer retrieval times than n-TOTs. In Experiment 3, with word definitions as stimuli, retrieval times were longer for emotional TOTs. Experiment 4 showed the same relation between retrieval times and TOTs even when participants made retrospective decisions about whether they had experienced a TOT before they retrieved the correct target. Valence of emotion was correlated with correct resolution of the TOT. These results are discussed in the context of a metacognitive model, in which TOTs serve to monitor and control cognition.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Barnes, A. E., Nelson, T. O., Dunlosky, J., Mazzoni, G., &Narens, L. (1999). An integrative system of metamemory components involved in retrieval. In D. Gopher & A. Koriat (Eds.),Attention and performance XVII: Cognitive regulation of performance: Interaction of theory and application (pp. 287–314). Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
Benjamin, A. S., Bjork, R. A., &Schwartz, B. L. (1998). The mismeasure of memory: When retrieval fluency is misleading as a metamnemonic index.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,127, 55–68.
Bjork, R.A. (1999). Assessing our own competence: Heuristics and illusions. In D. Gopher & A. Koriat (Eds.),Attention and performance XVII: Cognitive regulation of performance: Interaction of theory and application (pp. 435–459). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Brennan, T., Baguley, T., Bright, J., &Bruce, V. (1990). Resolving semantically induced tip-of-the-tongue states for proper nouns.Memory & Cognition,18, 339–347.
Brown, A. S. (1991). A review of the tip-of-the-tongue experience.Psychological Bulletin,109, 204–223.
Brown, R., &McNeill, D. (1966). The “tip of the tongue” phenomenon.Journal of Verbal Learning & Behavior,5, 325–337.
Burke, D. M., MacKay, D. G., Worthley, J. S., &Wade, E. (1991). On the tip of the tongue: What causes word finding failures in young and older adults?Journal of Memory & Language,30, 542–579.
Costermans, J., Lories, G., &Ansay, C. (1992). Confidence level and the feeling of knowing in question answering: The weight of inferential processes.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 142–150.
Gardiner, J.M., Craik, F. I.M., &Bleasdale, F.A. (1973). Retrieval difficulty and subsequent recall.Memory & Cognition,1, 213–216.
Harley, T.A., &Bown, H. E. (1998). What causes a tip-of-the-tongue state? Evidence for lexical neighbourhood effects in speech production.British Journal of Psychology,89, 151–174.
Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory.Journal of Memory & Language,30, 513–541.
Koriat, A., &Goldsmith, M. (1996). Monitoring and control processes in the strategic regulation of memory accuracy.Psychological Review,103, 490–517.
Koriat, A., &Lieblich, I. (1974). What does a person in a “TOT” state know that a person in a “don’t know” state doesn’t know.Memory & Cognition,2, 647–655.
Krinsky, R., &Nelson, T. O. (1985). The feeling of knowing for different types of retrieval failure.Acta Psychologica,58, 141–158.
Mazzoni, G., Cornoldi, C., &Marchitelli, G. (1993). Do memorability ratings affect study-time allocation?Memory & Cognition,18, 196–204.
Metcalfe, J., Schwartz, B. L., &Joaquim, S. G. (1993). The cue-familiarity heuristic in metacognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 851–861.
Miozzo, M., &Caramazza, A. (1997). Retrieval of lexical-syntactic features in tip-of-the-tongue states.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 1410–1423.
Nelson, T. O. (1984). A comparison of current measures of the accuracy of feeling-of-knowing predictions.Psychological Bulletin,95, 109–133.
Nelson, T. O. (1996). Consciousness and metacognition.American Psychologist,51, 102–116.
Nelson, T.O., Gerler, D., &Narens, L. (1984). Accuracy of feeling-of-knowing judgments for predicting perceptual identification and relearning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,113, 282–300.
Nelson, T.O., &Narens, L. (1980). Norms of 300 general-information questions: Accuracy of recall, latency of recall, and feeling-of-knowing ratings.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,19, 338–368.
Nelson, T. O., &Narens, L. (1990). Metamemory: A theoretical framework and some new findings. In A. C. Graesser & G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation: Inferences and text comprehension (Vol. 25, pp. 125–173). San Diego: Academic Press.
Nelson, T. O., &Narens, L. (1994). Why investigate metacognition? In J. Metcalfe & A. P. Shimamura (Eds.),Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 1–25). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Perfect, T. J., &Hanley, J. R. (1992). The tip-of-the-tongue phenomenon: Do experimenter-presented interlopers have any effect?Cognition,45, 55–75.
Reason, J. T., &Lucas, D. (1984). Using cognitive diaries to investigate naturally occurring memory blocks. In J. E. Harris & P. E. Morris (Eds.),Everyday memory, actions and absent-mindedness (pp. 53–70). London: Academic Press.
Ryan, M. P., Petty, C. R., &Wenzlaff, R. M. (1982). Motivated remembering efforts during tip-of-the-tongue states.Acta Psychologica,51, 137–147.
Schwartz, B. L. (1998). Illusory tip-of-the-tongue states.Memory,6, 623–642.
Schwartz, B. L. (1999). Sparkling at the end of the tongue: The etiology of tip-of-the-tongue phenomenology.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,6, 379–393.
Schwartz, B. L., Travis, D.M., Castro, A.M., Smith, S.M. (2000). The phenomenology of real and illusory tip-of-the-tongue states.Memory & Cognition,28, 18–27.
Smith, S.M. (1994). Frustrated feelings of imminent recall: On the tip-of-the tongue. In J. Metcalfe & A. P. Shimamura (Eds.),Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 27–46). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Stevens, J. (1986).Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Thiede, K.W., &Dunlosky, J. (1999). Toward a general model of self-regulated study: An analysis of selection of items for study and self-paced study time.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,25, 1024–1037.
Tulving, E. (1989). Memory: Performance, knowledge, and experience.European Journal of Cognitive Psychology,1, 3–26.
Vigliocco, G., Antonini, T., &Garrett, M. F. (1997). Grammatical gender is on the tip of Italian tongues.Psychological Science,8, 314–317.
Widner, R. L., Smith, S.M., &Graziano, W. G. (1996). The effects of demand characteristics on the reporting of tip-of-the-tongue states and feeling-of-knowing states.American Journal of Psychology,109, 525–538.
Wilkinson, T. S., &Nelson, T. O. (1984). FACTRETRIEVAL2: A PASCAL program for assessing someone’s recall of generalinformation facts, confidence about recall correctness, feeling-of-knowing judgments for nonrecalled facts, and recognition of nonrecalled facts.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,16, 486–488.
Winer, B. J. (1971).Statistical principles in experimental design (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Yaniv, I., &Meyer, D. E. (1987). Activation and metacognition of inaccessible stored information: Potential bases for incubation effects in problem solving.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,13, 187–205.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schwartz, B.L. The relation of tip-of-the-tongue states and retrieval time. Memory & Cognition 29, 117–126 (2001). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195746
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195746