Advertisement

COR V2: Teaching observational research with multimedia courseware

  • Dawn G. BlaskoEmail author
  • Victoria A. Kazmerski
  • Carla N. Torgerson
Article

Abstract

Courseware for Observational Research (COR Version 2) is an interactive multimedia program designed to teach the foundation of the scientific method: systematic observation. COR uses digital video with interactive coding to teach basic concepts, such as creating precise operational definitions; using frequency, interval, and duration coding; developing sampling strategies; and analyzing and interpreting data. Through lessons, a case study, and laboratory exercises, it gradually scaffolds students from teacher-directed learning into self-directed learning. The newest addition to COR is a case study in which students work collaboratively, using their own observations to make recommendations about a child’s disruptive behavior in an after-school program. Evaluations of the lessons showed that classes using COR received better grades on their field observations than did those using methods that are more traditional. Students’ confidence and knowledge increased as they moved through each section of the program.

Keywords

Observational Research Metacognitive Awareness Quiz Score Lesson Module Code Sheet 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Alessi, S. M., &Trollip, S. R. (2001).Multimedia for learning: Methods and development (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  2. Alexander, J. M., &Schwanenflugel, P. J. (1994). Strategy regulation: The role of intelligence, metacognitive attributions, and knowledge base.Developmental Psychology,30,709–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blasko, D. G., Kazmerski, V. A., Corty, E. W., &Kallgren, C. A. (1998). Courseware for observational research (COR): A new approach to teaching naturalistic observation,Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,30,217–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Craik, F. I. M., &Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,12,599–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gardner, H. (1991).The unschooled mind: How children think and how schools should teach. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  6. Johnson, D. W., &Johnson, R. T. (1999).Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  7. Kazmerski, V. A., &Blasko, D. G. (1999). Teaching observational research in introductory psychology: Computerized and lecture-based methods.Teaching of Psychology,26, 295–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Miserandino, M. (1999). Those who can do: Implementing active learning. In B. Perlman, L. I. McCann, & S. H. McFadden (Eds.),Lessons learned: Practical advice for the teaching of psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 109–114). Washington, DC: American Psychological Society.Google Scholar
  9. Thompson, C. P., Skowronski, J. J., Larsen, S. F., &Betz, A. (1996).Autobiographical memory: Remembering what and remembering when. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dawn G. Blasko
    • 1
    Email author
  • Victoria A. Kazmerski
    • 1
  • Carla N. Torgerson
    • 1
  1. 1.Humanities and Social SciencesPenn State ErieErie

Personalised recommendations