Ansburg, P. I. (2000). Individual differences in problem solving via insight.Current Psychology,19, 143–146.
Baba, Y. (1982). An analysis of creativity by means of the remote associates test for adults revised in Japanese (Jarat Form-A).Japanese Journal of Psychology,52, 330–336.
Beeman, M. J., &Bowden, E. M. (2000). The right hemisphere maintains solution-related activation for yet-to-be-solved problems.Memory & Cognition,28, 1231–1241.
Beeman, M. J., Bowden, E. M., & Haberman, J. (2002, April).The Aha!experience and semantic activation in the cerebral hemispheres. Poster presented at 9th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Neuroscience Society, San Francisco.
Beeman, M. J., Haberman, J., & Bowden, E. M. (2002, November).fMRI signal at the moment of insight, during insight-like verbal problems. Paper presented at the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Kansas City.
Ben-Zur, H. (1989). Automatic and directed search processes in solving simple semantic-memory problems.Memory & Cognition,17, 617–626.
Bowden, E. M., &Beeman, M. J. (1998). Getting the right idea: Semantic activation in the right hemisphere may help solve insight problems.Psychological Science,9, 435–440.
Bowden, E. M., &Jung-Beeman, M. J. (2003). Aha! Insight experience correlates with solution activation in the right hemisphere.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,10, 730–737.
Bowers, K. S., Regehr, G., Balthazard, C., &Parker, K. (1990). Intuition in the context of discovery.Cognitive Psychology,22, 72–110.
Dallob, P. I., & Dominowski, R. L. (1993, April).Erroneous solutions to verbal insight problems: Effects of highlighting critical material. Paper presented at the 73rd annual meeting of the Western Psychological Association, Portland, OR.
Dorfman, J., Shames, V. A., &Kihlstrom, J. F. (1996). Intuition, incubation, and insight: Implicit cognition in problem solving. In G. D. M. Underwood (Ed.),Implicit cognition (pp. 257–296). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fodor, E. M. (1999). Subclinical inclination toward manic-depression and creative performance on the Remote Associates Test.Personality & Individual Differences,27, 1273–1283.
Hamilton, M. A. (1982). “Jamaicanizing” the Mednick Remote Associates Test of creativity.Perceptual & Motor Skill,55, 321–322.
Kounios, J., Beeman, M. J., Liu, S., Frymiare, J., Angelakis, E., & Stathopoulou, T. (2003, March).The spark of insight: Electrophysiological correlates of the Aha!experience in problem solving. Poster presented at the 10th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Neuroscience Society, New York.
McFarlin, D. B., &Blascovich, J. (1984). On the Remote Associates Test (RAT) as an alternative to illusory performance feedback—A methodological note.Basic & Applied Social Psychology,5, 223–229.
Mednick, S. A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process.Psychological Review,69, 220–232.
Mednick, S. A. (1968). Remote Associates Test.Journal of Creative Behavior,2, 213–214.
Mednick, S. A., &Mednick, M. P. (1967).Examiner’s manual: Remote Associates Test. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Mikulincer, M., &Sheffi, E. (2000). Adult attachment style and cognitive reactions to positive affect: A test of mental categorization and creative problem solving.Motivation & Emotion,24, 149–174.
Nevo, B. &Levin, I. (1978). Remote Associates Test: Assessment of creativity in Hebrew.Megamot,24, 87–98.
Schooler, J. W., &Melcher, J. (1995). The ineffability of insight. In S. M. Smith, T. B. Ward, & R. A. Finke (Eds.),The creative cognition approach (pp. 249–268). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Shames, V. A. (1994).Is there such a thing as implicit problem-solving? Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Arizona.
Smith, S. M., &Blankenship, S. E. (1989). Incubation effects.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,27, 311–314.
Vohs, K. D., &Heatherton, T. F. (2001). Self-esteem and threats to self: Implications for self-construals and interpersonal perceptions.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,81, 1103–1118.