Abstract
We used a fully immersive virtual reality environment to study whether actively interacting with objects would effect subsequent recognition, when compared with passively observing the same objects. We found that when participants learned object structure by actively rotating the objects, the objects were recognized faster during a subsequent recognition task than when object structure was learned through passive observation. We also found that participants focused their study time during active exploration on a limited number of object views, while ignoring other views. Overall, our results suggest that allowing active exploration of an object during initial learning can facilitate recognition of that object, perhaps owing to the control that the participant has over the object views upon which they can focus. The virtual reality environment is ideal for studying such processes, allowing realistic interaction with objects while maintaining experimenter control.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Christou, C. G., &Bülthoff, H. H. (1999). View dependence in scene recognition after active learning.Memory & Cognition,27, 996–1007.
Harman, K. L., Humphrey, G. K., &Goodale, M. A. (1999). Active manual control of object views facilitates visual recognition.Current Biology,9, 1315–1318.
Harries, M. H., Perrett, D. I., &Lavender, A. (1991). Preferential inspection of views of 3-D model heads.Perception,20, 669–680.
Held, R. (1965, November). Plasticity in sensory-motor systems.Scientific American,213, 84–94.
Humphrey, G. K., &Khan, S. C. (1992). Recognizing novel views of three-dimensional objects.Canadian Journal of Psychology,46, 170–190.
James, K. H. (2001).Controlling what we see: The effects of active exploration on object recognition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Western Ontario.
James, K. H., Humphrey, G. K., &Goodale, M. A. (2001). Manipulating and recognizing virtual objects: Where the action is.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology,55, 111–120.
Perrett, D. I., &Harries, M. H. (1988). Characteristic views and the visual inspection of simple faceted and smooth objects: “Tetrahedra and potatoes.”Perception,17, 703–720.
Perrett, D. I., Harries, M. H., &Looker, S. (1992). Use of preferential inspection to define the viewing sphere and characteristic views of an arbitrary machined tool part.Perception,21, 497–515.
Snodgrass, J. G., &Corwin, J. (1988). Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: Applications to dementia and amnesia.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,117, 34–50.
Tarr, M. J., &Kreigman, D. J. (2001). What defines a view?Vision Research,41, 1981–2004.
Tong, F. H., Marlin, S. G., & Frost, B. J. (1995, June).Cognitive map formation in a 3D visual virtual world. Poster presented at the IRIS/ PRECARN workshop, Vancouver, BC.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by a Canadian Institutes of Health Research Student Fellowship to K.H.J. and by research grants from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research to G.K.H., T.V., and M.A.G.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
James, K.H., Humphrey, G.K., Vilis, T. et al. “Active” and “passive” learning of three-dimensional object structure within an immersive virtual reality environment. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 34, 383–390 (2002). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195466
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195466