Abstract
We have developed a method for studying list learning in animals and humans, and we use variants of the task to examine list learning in rats, mice, and humans. This method holds several advantages over other methods. It has been found to be easily learned without lengthy pretraining. The data gathered with this procedure provide a measure of correct response rates, of incorrect responses and the locations of these responses, and of response latency on a trial-by-trialbasis. We have examined mouse, rat, and human list acquisition of patterns ranging from 12 to 48 items in length. This procedure has also been used to examine many aspects of list learning, such as the effects of the placement of phrasing cues that are either consistent or inconsistent with the structure of the list in rats and mice, the effects of phrasing cues of differing modalities in mice, the sensitivity of subjects to violations of list structure in rats, subjects’ abilities to “chunk” from nonadjacent serial positions in structured lists in rats, and subjects’ sensitivity to serial patterns with multiple levels of hierarchical organization. The procedure has also been used to examine the effects of drugs on sequential learning.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Fountain, S. B. (1990). Rule abstraction, item memory, and chunking in rat serial-pattern tracking.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,16, 96–105.
Fountain, S. B., &Annau, Z (1984). Chunking, sorting, and rule-learning from serial patterns of brain-stimulation reward by rats.Animal Learning & Behavior,12, 265–274.
Fountain, S. B., Krauchunas, S. M., &Rowan, J. D. (1999). Serial-pattern learning in mice: Pattern structure and phrasing.Psychological Record,2, 173–192.
Fountain, S. B., &Rowan, J. D. (1995a). Coding of hierarchical versus linear pattern structure in rats and humans.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,3, 187–202.
Fountain, S. B., &Rowan, J. D. (1995b). Pattern coding in a nonverbal species: Sensitivity to violations of “runs” and “trills” structure in rats.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,1, 78–81.
Fountain, S. B., &Rowan, J. D. (2000). Differential impairments of rat serial pattern learning and retention induced by MK-801, an NMDA receptor antagonist.Psychobiology,28, 32–44.
Fountain, S. B., Rowan, J. D., &Benson, D. M. (1999). Rule learning in rats: Serial tracking in interleaved patterns.Animal Cognition,2, 41–54.
Fountain, S. B., Wallace, D. G., Carman, H. M., Rowan, J. D., Stempowski, N. K., & Benson, A. M. (in press). Discrimination learning, rule learning, and hippocampal versus nonhippocampal processes in sequential behavior. In S. B. Fountain, M. Bunsey, J. H. Danks, & M. K. McBeath (Eds.),Animal cognition and sequential behavior: Behavioral, biological, and computational perspectives. Norwell, MA: Kluwer.
Hulse, S. H., &Dorsky, N. P. (1977). Structural complexity as a determinant of serial pattern learning.Learning & Motivation,8, 488–506.
Lashley, K. S. (1951). Theproblem of serial order in behavior. In L. A. Jeffress (Ed.),Cerebral mechanisms in behavior (pp. 112–146). New York: Wiley.
Restle, F., &Brown, E. R. (1970). Serial pattern learning: Pretraining of runs and trills.Psychonomic Science,19, 321–322.
Restle, F., &Burnside, B. L. (1972). Tracking of serial patterns.Journal of Experimental Psychology,95, 299–307.
Wallace, D. G., Rowan, J. D., & Fountain, S. B. (2001).Determinants of phrasing effects in rat serial pattern learning. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was supported by National Institute of Mental Health Grant MH48402 and in part by National Institutes of Health Extramural Associates Program Grant HD32814.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rowan, J.D., Fountain, S.B., Kundey, S.M.A. et al. A multiple species approach to sequential learning: Are you a man or a mouse?. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 33, 435–439 (2001). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195398
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195398