Advertisement

Presentation accuracy of Web animation methods

  • William C. SchmidtEmail author
Article

Abstract

Several Web animation methods were independently assessed on fast and slow systems running two popular Web browsers under MacOS and Windows. The methods assessed included those requiring programming (Authorware, Java, Javascript/Jscript), browser extensions (Flash and Authorware), or neither (animated GIF). The number of raster scans that an image in an animation was presented for was counted. This was used as an estimate of the minimum presentation time for the image when the software was set to update the animation as quickly as possible. In a second condition, the image was set to be displayed for 100 msec, and differences between observed and expected presentations were used to assess accuracy. In general, all the methods except Java deteriorated as a function of the speed of the computer system, with the poorest temporal resolutions and greatest variability occurring on slower systems. For some animation methods, poor performance was dependent on browser, operating system, system speed, or combinations of these.

Keywords

Behavior Research Method Slow System Screen Refresh White Frame Animation Frame 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Baron, J., &Siepman, M. (2000). Techniques for creating and using Web questionnaires in research and teaching. In M. H. Birnbaum (Ed.),Psychological experiments on the Internet (pp. 235–265). San Diego: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Eichstaedt, J. (2001). An inaccurate-timing filter for reaction time measurement by JAVA applets implementing Internet-based experiments.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,33, 179–186.Google Scholar
  3. Finney, S. A. (2001). Real-time data collection in Linux: A case study.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,33, 167–173.Google Scholar
  4. Francis, G., Neath, I., &Surprenant, A. M. (2000). The cognitive psychology online laboratory. In M. H. Birnbaum (Ed.),Psychological experiments on the Internet (pp. 267–283). San Diego: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Graves, R. E., &Bradley, R. (1991). Millisecond timing on the IBM PC/XT/AT and PS/2: A review of the options and corrections for the Graves and Bradley algorithm.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,23, 377–379.Google Scholar
  6. Hecht, H., Oesker, M., Kaiser, A., Civelek, H., &Stecker, T. (1999). A perception experiment with time-critical graphics animation on the World-Wide Web.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,31, 439–445.Google Scholar
  7. Horswill, M. S., &Coster, M. E. (2001). User-controlled photographic animations, photograph-based questions, and questionnaires: Three Internet-based instruments for measuring drivers’ risk-taking behavior.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,33, 46–58.Google Scholar
  8. Inside Web Development (2000). Are you trafficking in illegal GIFs?Inside Web Development,1, 6–8.Google Scholar
  9. Krantz, J. H. (2000). Tell me, what did you see? The stimulus on computers.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,32, 221–229.Google Scholar
  10. Krantz, J. H., Ballard, J., &Scher, J. (1997). Comparing the results of laboratory and World-Wide Web samples on the determinants of female attractiveness.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,29, 264–269.Google Scholar
  11. Macromedia, Inc. (2001).Macromedia Flashplayer adoption statistics [On-line], Available: http://www.macromedia.com/software/player_census/flashplayer/ [retrieved February 2, 2001].Google Scholar
  12. McGraw, K. O., Tew, M. D., &Williams, J. E. (2000a). The integrity of Web-delivered experiments: Can you trust the data?Psychological Science,11, 502–506.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. McGraw, K. O., Tew, M. D., &Williams, J. E. (2000b). PsychExps: An on-line psychology laboratory. In M. H. Birnbaum (Ed.),Psychological experiments on the Internet (pp. 219–233). San Diego: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. McKinney, C. J., MacCormac, E. R., &Welsh-Bohmer, K. A. (1999). Hardware and software for tachistoscopy: How to make accurate measurements on any PC utilizing the Microsoft Windows operating system.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,31, 129–136.Google Scholar
  15. Myors, B. (1999). Timing accuracy of PC programs runningunder DOS and Windows.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,31, 322–328.Google Scholar
  16. Schmidt, W. C., Hoffman, R., &MacDonald, J. (1997). Operate your own World-Wide Web server.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, &Computers,29, 189–193.Google Scholar
  17. Stevenson, A. K., Francis, G., &Kim, H. (1999). Java experiments for introductory cognitive psychology courses.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,31, 99–106.Google Scholar
  18. Welch, N., &Krantz, J. H. (1996). The World-Wide Web as amedium for psychoacoustical demonstrations and experiments: Experience and results.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,28, 192–196.Google Scholar
  19. Williams, J. E., McGraw, K. O., &Tew, M. D. (1999). Undergraduate labs and computers: The case for PsychExps.Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,31, 287–291.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyState University of New YorkBuffalo

Personalised recommendations