Abstract
The visual system processes object properties (such as shape and color) and spatial properties (such as location and spatial relations) in distinct systems, and neuropsychological evidence reveals that mental imagery respects this distinction. The findings reported in this article demonstrate that verbalizers typically perform at anintermediate level on imagery tasks, whereas visualizers can be divided into two groups. Specifically, scores on spatial and object imagery tasks, along with a visualizer-verbalizer cognitive style questionnaire, identified a group of visualizers who scored poorly on spatial imagery tasks but excelled on object imagery tasks. In contrast, a second group of visualizers scored high on spatial imagery tasks but poorly on object imagery tasks. The results also indicate that object visualizers encode and process images holistically, as a single perceptual unit, whereas spatial visualizers generate and process images analytically, part by part. In addition, we found that scientists and engineers excel in spatial imagery and prefer spatial strategies, whereas visual artists excel in object imagery and prefer object-based strategies.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aginsky, V., Harris, C., Rensink, R., &Beusmans, J. (1997). Two strategies for learning a route in a driving simulator.Journal of Environmental Psychology,17, 317–331.
Alesandrini, K. L. (1981). Pictorial-verbal and analytical-holistic learning strategies in science learning.Journal of Educational Psychology,73, 358–368.
Ausburn, L. J., &Ausburn, F. B. (1978). Cognitive styles: Some information and implications for instructional design.Educational Communications & Technology Journal,26, 337–354.
Baddeley, A. [D.] (1992). Is working memory working? The Fifteenth Bartlett Lecture.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,44A, 1–31.
Bartlett, F. C. (1932).Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Blajenkova, O., & Kozhevnikov, M. (2002, November).Two types of imagers: The new self-report questionnaire. Paper presented at the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Kansas City.
Campos, A., &Suerio, E. (1993). Sex and age differences in visual imagery vividness.Journal of Mental Imagery,17, 91–94.
Carpenter, P., Just, M. A., &Shell, P. (1990). What one intelligence test measures: A theoretical account for the processing in the Raven Progressive Matrices test.Psychological Review,97, 404–431.
Cohen J. D., MacWhinney B., Flatt M., &Provost J. (1993). PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,25, 257–271.
Collins, D. W., &Kimura, D. (1997). A large sex difference on a twodimensional mental rotation task.Behavioral Neuroscience,111, 845–849.
Edwards, J. E., &Wilkins, W. (1981). Verbalizer-visualizer questionnaire: Relationship with imagery and verbal-visual ability.Journal of Mental Imagery,5, 137–142.
Ekstrom, R. B., French, J. W., &Harman, H. H. (1976).Manual for kit of factor referenced cognitive tests. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Engle, R. W., Kane, M. J., &Tuholski, S. W. (1999). Individual differences in working memory capacity and what they tell us about controlled attention, general fluid intelligence, and functions of the prefrontal cortex. In A. Miyake & P. Shah (Eds.),Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 102–135). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Farah, M. J., Hammond, K. M., Levine, D. N., &Calvanio, R. (1988). Visual and spatial mental imagery: Dissociable systems of representations.Cognitive Psychology,20, 439–462.
Geary, D. C., Gilger, J. W., &Elliot-Miller, B. (1992). Gender differences in three-dimensional mental rotation: A replication.Journal of Genetic Psychology,153, 115–117.
Green, K. E., &Schroeder, D. H. (1990). Psychometric quality of the verbalizer-visualizer questionnaire as a measure of cognitive style.Psychological Reports,66, 939–945.
Haxby, J. V., Grady, C. L., Horwitz, B., Ungerleider, L. G., Mishkin, M., Carson, R. E., Herscovitch, P., Schapiro, M. B., &Rapoport, S. I. (1991). Dissociation of object and spatial visual processing pathways in human extrastriate cortex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,88, 1621–1625.
Hegarty, M., &Kozhevnikov, M. (1999). Types of visual-spatial representations and mathematical problem solving.Journal of Educational Psychology,91, 684–689.
Hunt, E. (1975). Quote the raven? Nevermore! In L. W. Gregg (Ed.),Knowledge and cognition (pp. 129–158). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kail, R., Carter, P., &Pellegrino, J. (1979). The locus of sex differences in spatial ability.Perception & Psychophysics,26, 182–186.
Keefe, J. W. (1979). Learning style: An overview. In J. W. Keefe (Ed.),Student learning styles: Diagnosing and prescribing programs (pp. 1–17). Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals.
Kirby, J., Moore, P., &Shofield, N. (1988). Verbal and visual learning styles.Contemporary Educational Psychology,13, 169–184.
Kosslyn, S. M. (1994).Image and brain: The resolution of the imagery debate. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kosslyn, S. M., Ganis, G., &Thompson, W. L. (2001). Neural foundations of imagery.Nature Reviews Neuroscience,2, 635–642.
Kosslyn, S. M., &Koenig, O. (1992).Wet mind: The new cognitive neuroscience. New York: Free Press.
Kozhevnikov, M., Hegarty, M., &Mayer, R. E. (2002). Revising the visualizer/verbalizer dimension: Evidence for two types of visualizers.Cognition & Instruction,20, 47–77.
Krutetskii, V. A. (1976).The psychology of mathematical abilities in schoolchildren. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lean, C., &Clements, M. A. (1981). Spatial ability, visual imagery, and mathematical performance.Educational Studies in Mathematics,12, 267–299.
Levine, D. N., Warach, J., &Farah, M. J. (1985). Two visual systems in mental imagery: Dissociation of “what” and “where” in imagery disorders due to bilateral posterior cerebral lesions.Neurology,35, 1010–1018.
Lohman, D. F. (1988). Spatial abilities as traits, processes, and knowledge. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.),Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (pp. 181–232). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Marks, D. F. (1972). Visual imagery differences in the recall of pictures.British Journal of Psychology,64, 17–24.
Messer, S. B. (1976). Reflection-impulsivity: A review.Psychological Bulletin,83, 1026–1053.
Messick, S. (1976).Individuality in learning: Implications of cognitive style and creativity for human development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Messick, S. (1984). The nature of cognitive styles: Problems and promise in educational practice.Educational Psychologist,19, 59–74.
Miller.A. (1996).Insights of genius: Imagery and creativity in science and art. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Milner, A. D., &Goodale, M. A. (1995).The visual brain in action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Moses, B. E. (1980, April).The relationship between visual thinking tasks and problem-solving performance. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Education Research Association, Boston.
O’Reilly, R. C., Braver, T. S., &Cohen, J. D. (1999). A biologically based computational model of working memory. In A. Miyake & P. Shah (Eds.),Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 102–135). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Paivio, A. (1971).Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Paivio, A., &Clark, J. M. (1991). Static versus dynamic imagery. In C. Cornoldi & M. A. McDaniels (Eds.),Imagery and cognition (pp. 221–245). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Paivio, A., &Harshman, R. A. (1983). Factor analysis of a questionnaire on imagery and verbal habits and skills.Canadian Journal of Psychology,37, 461–483.
Poltrock, S. E., &Agnoli, F. (1986). Are spatial visualization and visual imagery ability equivalent? In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.),Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (pp. 255–296). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Poltrock, S. E., &Brown, P. (1984). Individual differences in spatial ability.Intelligence,8, 93–138.
Prabhakaran, V., Smith, J. A. L., Desmond, J. E., Glover, G. H., &Gabrieli, J. D. E. (1997). Neural substrates of fluid reasoning: An f MRI study of neocortical activation during performance of the Raven’s progressive matrices test.Cognitive Psychology,33, 43–63.
Presmeg, N. C. (1986a). Visualization and mathematical giftedness.Educational Studies in Mathematics,17, 297–311.
Presmeg, N. C. (1986b). Visualization in high school mathematics.For the Learning of Mathematics,63, 42–46.
Raven, J., Raven.J. C., &Court, J. H. (1998).Manual for Raven’s Progressive Matrices and Vocabulary Scales: Section 4, Advanced Progressive Matrices, Sets I and II, 1998 Edition. Oxford: Oxford Psychologists Press.
Richardson, A. (1977). Verbalizer-visualizer: A cognitive style dimension.Journal of Mental Imagery,1, 109–126.
Richardson, J. T. E. (1999).Imagery. Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
Riding, R., &Cheema, I. (1991). Cognitive styles: An overview and integration.Educational Psychology,11, 193–215.
Rouw, R., Kosslyn, S., &Hamel, R. (1997). Detecting high-level and low-level properties in visual images and visual percepts.Cognition,63, 209–226.
Shepard, R. N., &Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of threedimensional objects.Science,191, 952–954.
Snodgrass, J. G., &Vanderwart, M. A. (1980). Standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity.Journal of Experimental Psychology,6, 174–215.
Strosahl, K. D., &Ascough, J. C. (1981). Clinical uses of mental imagery: Experimental foundations, theoretical misconceptions, and research issues.Psychological Bulletin,89, 422–438.
Uhl, F., Goldenberg, G., Lang, W., &Lindinger, G. (1990). Cerebral correlates of imagining colours, faces and a map: II. Negative cortical DC potentials.Neuropsychologia,28, 81–93.
Ungerleider, L. G., &Mishkin, M. (1982). Two cortical visual systems. In D. J. Ingle, M. A. Goodale, & R. J. W. Mansfield (Eds.),Analysis of visual behavior (pp. 549–586). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Wechsler, D. (1999).WASI: Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence. San Antonio: Psychological Corporation, Harcourt Brace.
Witkin, H. A., Moore, C. A., Goodenough, D. R., &Cox, P. W. (1977). Field-dependent and field-independent cognitive styles and their implications.Review of Educational Research,47, 1–64.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant REC-0106760.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kozhevnikov, M., Kosslyn, S. & Shephard, J. Spatial versus object visualizers: A new characterization of visual cognitive style. Mem Cogn 33, 710–726 (2005). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195337
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195337