Abstract
At what stage does semantic priming affect accuracy in target search? In two experiments, participants viewed two streams of stimuli, each including a target word among distractors. Stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs) between the targets (T1 and T2) ranged from 53 to 213 msec. A word semantically related to one or neither of the targets preceded each trial. In Experiment 1, participants were instructed to report both targets. Although more primed than unprimed targets were reported, there was no cost for unprimed words. A strong interaction between SOA and T1 versus T2 was found, but priming did not interact with either variable. In Experiment 2, only related targets were reported. Performance was similar to that for primed targets in Experiment 1. Semantic priming does not seem to modulate how attentional resources are initially allocated between targets, but instead affects a later stage of processing, the point at which a target word reaches lexical identification.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Broadbent, D. E., &Broadbent, M. H. (1987). From detection to identification: Response to multiple targets in rapid serial visual presentation.Perception & Psychophysics,42, 105–113.
Cohen, J. (1977).Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (rev. ed.). New York: Academic Press.
Chun, M. M., &Potter, M. C. (1995). A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,21, 109–127.
Dark, V. J., Vochatzer, K. G., &VanVoorhis, B. A. (1996). Semantic and spatial components of selective attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,22, 63–81.
Hunt, S. M. J. (1994). MacProbe: A Macintosh-based experimenter’s workstation for the cognitive sciences.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,26, 345–351.
Jolicoeur, P., &Dell’Acqua, R. (1998). The demonstration of shortterm consolidation.Cognitive Psychology,36, 138–202.
Juola, J. F., Duvuru, P., &Peterson, M. S. (2000). Priming effects in attentional gating.Memory & Cognition,28, 224–235.
Lawrence, D. H. (1971). Two studies of visual search for word targets with controlled rates of presentation.Perception & Psychophysics,10, 85–89.
Luck, S. J., Vogel, E. K., &Shapiro, K. L. (1996). Word meanings can be accessed but not reported during the attentional blink.Nature,383, 616–618.
Maki, W. S., Frigen, K., &Paulson, K. (1997). Associative priming by targets and distractors during rapid serial visual presentation: Does word meaning survive the attentional blink?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,23, 1014–1034.
Martens, S., Wolters, G., &van Raamsdonk, M. (2002). Blinks of the mind: Memory effects of attentional processes.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,28, 1275–1287.
Neely, J. H. (1991). Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. In D. Besner & G.W. Humphreys (Eds.),Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition (pp. 264–336). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L., & Schreiber, T. A. (1998).TheUniversity of South Florida word association, rhyme, and word fragment norms. Available at http://www.usf.edu/FreeAssociation/.
Potter, M. C. (1976). Short-term conceptual memory for pictures.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,2, 509–522.
Potter, M. C. (in press). Competition for attention in space and time: The first 200 ms. In H.Ogmen & B. G. Breitmeyer (Eds.),The first half second: The microgenesis and temporal dynamics of unconscious and conscious visual processes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Potter, M. C., Chun, M. M., Banks, B. S., &Muckenhoupt, M. (1998). Two attentional deficits in serial target search: The visual attentional blink and an amodal task-switch deficit.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 979–992.
Potter, M. C., Moryadas, A., Abrams, I., &Noel, A. (1993). Word perception and misperception in context.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 3–22.
Potter, M. C., Staub, A., &O’Connor, D. H. (2002). The time course of competition for attention: Attention is initially labile.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,28, 1149–1162.
Raymond, J. E., Shapiro, K. L., &Arnell, K. M. (1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,18, 849–860.
Rolke, B., Heil, M., Streb, J., &Hennighausen, E. (2001). Missed prime words within the attentional blink evoke an N400 semantic priming effect.Psychophysiology,38, 165–174.
Shapiro, K. L., Driver, J., Ward, R., &Sorensen, R. E. (1997). Priming from the attentional blink: A failure to extract visual tokens but not visual types.Psychological Science,8, 95–100.
Shapiro, K. L., Raymond, J. E., &Arnell, K. M. (1994). Attention to visual pattern information produces the attentional blink in RSVP.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 357–371.
Shih, S.-I. (2000). Recall of two visual targets embedded in RSVP streams of distractors depends on their temporal and spatial relationship.Perception & Psychophysics,62, 1348–1355.
Vogel, E. K., Luck, S. J., &Shapiro, K. L. (1998). Electrophysiological evidence for a postperceptual locus of suppression during the attentional blink.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 1656–1674.
Weichselgartner, E. &Sperling, G. (1987). Dynamics of automatic and controlled visual attention.Science,238, 778–780
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by Grants MH47432 and MH20007 from the National Institute of Mental Health.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Davenport, J.L., Potter, M.C. The locus of semantic priming in RSVP target search. Mem Cogn 33, 241–248 (2005). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195313
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195313