Abstract
In Arabic, there are two ways, differing in length, of pronouncing each digit. This feature of word pairs that are conceptually identical but of different length allows for a stricter test of the phonological loop hypothesis than has been reported previously. Libyan schoolchildren, both boys and girls, of two grades took part in a quasi-experimental study in which shorter and longer digits and shorter and longer words were presented in recall and pronunciation tasks. The results confirmed the validity of the phonological loop model in that memory span was longer for shorter stimuli. Analysis of the data with structural equation modeling showed that only 17% of the individual-level variation in memory span could be explained by pronunciation speed. In an analysis of covariance, it was determined that pronunciation speed could account for a substantial proportion of the variation found across age (8-year-olds vs. 10-year-olds), stimulus modality (digits vs. words), and stimulus length (short vs. long), but not for gender differences.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Baddeley, A. [D.] (1997).Human memory: Theory and practice (rev. ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Baddeley, A. D., &Hitch, G. J. (1974). Working memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 8, pp. 742–775). New York: Academic Press.
Baddeley, A. D., &Hitch, G. J. (1977). Recency re-examined. In S. Dornic (Ed.),Attention and performance VI (pp. 647–667). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Baddeley, A. D., Thomson, N., &Buchanan, M. (1975). Word length and the structure of short-term memory.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,14, 575–589.
Broadbent, D. E. (1984). The Maltese Cross: A new simplistic model for memory.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,7, 55–94.
Case, R., Kurland, D. M., &Goldberg, J. (1982). Operational efficiency and the growth of short-term memory span.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,33, 386–404.
Cheung, H., Kemper, S., &Leung, E. (2000). A phonological account for the cross-language variation in working memory processing.Psychological Record,50, 373–386.
Cohen, J. (1988).Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Ellis, N. C., &Hennelly, R. A. (1980). Bilingual word length effect: Implication for intelligence testing and the relative ease of mental calculation in Welsh and English.British Journal of Psychology,71, 43–51.
Gupta, P., &MacWhinney, B. (1995). Is the articulatory loop articulatory or auditory? Reexamining the effects of concurrent articulation on immediate serial recall.Journal of Memory & Language,34, 63–88.
Hitch, G. J., &Halliday, M. S. (1983). Working memory in children.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Series B,302, 325–340.
Hitch, G. J., Halliday, M. S., Dodd, A., &Littler, J. E. (1989). Development of rehearsal in short-term memory: Differences between pictorial and spoken stimuli.British Journal of Developmental Psychology,7, 347–362.
Hitch, G. J., Halliday, M. S., Schaafstal, A. M., &Heffernan, T. M. (1991). Speech, “inner speech” and the development of short-term memory: Effects of picture labelling on recall.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,51, 220–234.
Hoosain, R., &Salili, F. (1987). Language differences in pronunciation speed for numbers, digit span, and mathematical ability.Psychologia: An International Journal of Psychology in the Orient,30, 34–38.
Hulme, C., Silvester, J., Smith, S., &Muir, C. (1986). The effects of word length on memory for pictures: Evidence for speech coding in young children.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,41, 61–75.
Hulme, C., Thomson, N., Muir, C., &Lawrence, A. (1984). Speech rate and the development of short-term memory span.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,38, 241–253.
Landauer, T. K. (1962). Rate of implicit speech.Perceptual & Motor Skills,15, 646.
Naveh-Benjamin, M., &Ayres, T. J. (1986). Digit span, reading rate, and linguistic relativity.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,38A, 739–751.
Nicolson, R. (1981). The relationship between memory span and processing speed. In M. P. Friedman, J. P. Das, & N. O’Conner (Eds.),Intelligence and learning (pp. 179–184). New York: Plenum.
Noël, M. P., Désert, M., Aubrun, A., &Seron, X. (2001). Involvement of short-term memory in complex mental calculation.Memory & Cognition,29, 34–42.
Scheier, I. H. (1959). The method of natural variation in applied educational research.Journal of Educational Research,52, 167–170.
Schneider, W., &Pressley, M. (1997).Memory development between two and twenty (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Schweickert, R. (1993). A multinomial processing tree model for degradation and redintegration in immediate recall.Memory & Cognition,21, 168–175.
Schweickert, R., &Boruff, B. (1986). Short-term memory capacity: Magic number or magic spell?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition,12, 419–425.
Stigler, J. W., Lee, S. W., &Stevenson, H. W. (1986). Digit memory span in Chinese and English: Evidence for a temporary limited store.Cognition,23, 1–20.
Wechsler, D. (1991).Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children—Third Edition. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
Zhang, G., &Simon, H. A. (1985). STM capacity for Chinese words and idioms: Chunking and acoustical loop hypotheses.Memory & Cognition,13, 193–201.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shebani, M.F.A., Van De Vijver, F.J.R. & Poortinga, Y.H. A strict test of the phonological loop hypothesis with Libyan data. Mem Cogn 33, 196–202 (2005). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195308
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195308