Abstract
In this article, we report a perceptual asymmetry for the two diagonals that is related to gender in that females prefer the diagonal spanning from top right to bottom left (/) whereas males prefer the opposite (∖). This relationship is observed in a variety of tasks, including aesthetic judgment of paintings, spotting differences between two paintings, and visual search for a tilted line among similarly tilted distractors. This article does not provide an explanation of the relationship between this asymmetry and gender but rules out several potential mediating factors, such as eye dominance, head tilt, handedness, and hemispheric differences. At the same time, the scope of the phenomenon is outlined: The asymmetry is found for both meaningful and meaningless stimuli and in both brief and extended presentations. Moreover, the asymmetry is found to be related to the tilt of the visual elements that require processing, not to their location in the visual field.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Arnheim, R. (1982).The power of the center: A theory of composition in the visual arts. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Arnold-Schulz-Gahmen, B. E., Selinski, S., &Ehrenstein, W. H. (1999). Eye, ear, hand, and foot: Gender differences of individual laterality profiles [Abstract]. InTwenty-seventh Göttingen Neurobiology Conference (Vol. 2, p. 877). Stuttgart: Thieme.
Avrahami, J. (1998). Presence and absence of top and right advantage as an indication of the attentional strategies underlying object selection.Perception,2, 431–438.
Avrahami, J. (1999). Objects of attention, objects of perception.Perception & Psychophysics,61, 1604–1612.
Christman, S. D. (1993). Local-global processing in the upper versus lower visual fields.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,31, 275–278.
Enns, J. T., &Rensink, R. A. (1992).VScope: A general purpose tachistoscope for the Macintosh. Vancouver: Micropsych Software.
Gaffron, M. (1950). Right and left in pictures.Art Quarterly,13, 312–331.
Greenberg, G. (1960). Eye-dominance and head-tilt.American Journal of Psychology,73, 149–151.
Hellige, J. B. (1993).Hemispheric asymmetry: What’s right and what’s left. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Jewell, G., &McCourt, M. E. (2000). Pseudoneglect: A review and meta-analysis of performance factors in line bisection tasks.Neuropsychologia,38, 93–110.
Kosslyn, S. M. (1987). Seeing and imaging in the cerebral hemispheres: A computational approach.Psychological Review,94, 148–175.
Levy, J. (1976). Lateral dominance and aesthetic preference.Neuropsychologia,14, 431–445.
McLaughlin, J. P. (1986). Aesthetic preference and lateral preferences.Neuropsychologia,24, 587–590.
McLaughlin, J. P., Dean, P., &Stanley, P. (1982). Aesthetic preference in dextrals and sinistrals.Neuropsychologia,21, 147–153.
McManus, I. C., Bryden, M. P., &Bourassa, D. C. (1996). Handedness and eye-dominance: Explaining the association.Brain & Cognition,30, 357–358.
Rubin, N., Nakayama, K., &Shapley, R. (1996). Enhanced percep tion of illusory contours in the lower versus upper visual hemifields.Science,271, 651–653.
Snodgrass, J. G., &Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,6, 174–215.
Yarbus, A. L. (1967).Eye movements and vision. New York: Plenum.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Avrahami, J., Argaman, T. & Weiss-Chasum, D. The mysteries of the diagonal: Gender-related perceptual asymmetries. Perception & Psychophysics 66, 1405–1417 (2004). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195007
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195007