Abstract
Unlike the visual stimuli used in most object identification experiments, melodies are organized temporally rather than spatially. Therefore, they may be particularly sensitive to manipulations of the order in which information is revealed. Two experiments examined whether the initial elements of a melody are differentially important for identification. Initial exposures to impoverished versions of a melody significantly decreased subsequent identification, especially when the early exposures did not include the initial notes of the melody. Analyses of the initial notes indicated that they are differentially important for melody identification because they help the listener detect the overall structure of the melody. Confusion errors tended to be songs that either were drawn from the same genre or shared similar phrasing. These data indicate that conceptual processing influences melody identification, that phrase-level information is used to organize melodies in semantic memory, and that phrase-level information is required to effectively search semantic memory.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Banich, M. T., &Heller, W. (1998). Evolving perspective on lateralization of function.Current Directions in Psychological Science,7, 1–2.
Bartlett, J. C., &Snelus, P. (1980). Lifespan memory for popular songs.American Journal of Psychology,93, 551–560.
Bever, T. G., &Chiarello, R. J. (1974). Cerebral dominance in musicians and nonmusicians.Science,185, 537–539.
Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding.Psychological Review,94, 115–147.
Bruner, J. S., &Potter, M. C. (1964). Interference in visual recognition.Science,144, 424–425.
Butler, D. (1992).The musician’s guide to perception and cognition. New York: Macmillan.
Cuddy, L. L. (1993). Melody comprehension and tonal structure. In T. J. Tighe & W. J. Dowling (Eds.),Psychology and music: The understanding of melody and rhythm (pp. 19–38). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Dowling, W. J. (1974). The perception of interleaved melodies.Cognitive Psychology,5, 322–337.
Dowling, W. J., Lung, K.-T. M., &Herrbold, S. (1987). Aiming attention in pitch and time in the perception of interleaved melodies.Perception & Psychophysics,41, 642–656.
Gates, A., &Bradshaw, J. L. (1977a). Music perception and cerebral asymmetries.Cortex,13, 390–401.
Gates, A., &Bradshaw, J. L. (1977b). The role of the cerebral hemispheres in music.Brain & Language,4, 403–431.
Gibson, J. M., &Watkins, M. J. (1991). An auditory cue-depreciation effect.American Journal of Psychology,104, 439–446.
Halpern, A. R. (1984). Organization in memory for familiar songs.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,10, 496–512.
HÉbert, S., &Peretz, I. (1997). Recognition of music in long-term memory: Are melodic and temporal patterns equal partners?Memory & Cognition,25, 518–533.
Jones, M. R., &Boltz, M. (1989). Dynamic attending and reactions to time.Psychological Review,96, 459–491.
Jusczyk, P. W., &Luce, P. A. (2002). Speech perception. In H. Pashler & S. Yantis (Eds.),Stevens’ Handbook of experimental psychology: Vol. 1. Sensation and perception (3rd ed., pp. 493–536). New York: Wiley.
Krumhansl, C. L. (1979). The psychological representation of musical pitch in a tonal context.Cognitive Psychology,11, 346–374.
Krumhansl, C. L. (1990).Cognitive foundations of musical pitch. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kubovy, M., &Van Valkenburg, D. (2001). Auditory and visual objects.Cognition,80, 97–126.
Laeng, B., Shah, J., &Kosslyn, S. (1999). Identifying objects in conventional and contorted poses: Contributions of hemisphere-specific mechanisms.Cognition,70, 53–85.
Lindfield, K. C., &Wingfield, A. (1999). An experimental and computational analysis of age differences in the recognition of fragmented pictures: Inhibitory connections versus speed of processing.Experimental Aging Research,25, 223–242.
Lindfield, K. C., Wingfield, A., &Bowles, N. L. (1994). Identification of fragmented pictures under ascending versus fixed presentation in young and elderly adults: Evidence for the inhibition-deficit hypothesis.Aging & Cognition,4, 1–10.
Luo, C. R., &Snodgrass, J. G. (1994). Competitive activation model of perceptual interference in picture and word identification.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 50–60.
Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1987). Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition.Cognition,25, 71–102.
Marslen-Wilson, W. [D.], Moss, H. E., &van Halen, S. (1996). Perceptual distance and competition in lexical access.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,22, 1376–1392.
Marslen-Wilson, W. [D.], &Tyler, L. K. (1980). The temporal structure of spoken language understanding.Cognition,8, 1–71.
Marslen-Wilson, W. [D.], &Zwitserlood, P. (1989). Accessing spoken words: The importance of word onsets.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,15, 576–585.
Narmour, E. (1990).The analysis and cognition of basic melodic structures: The implication-realization model. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Neuhoff, J. G. (2003). Pitch variation is unnecessary (and sometimes insufficient) for the formation of auditory objects.Cognition,87, 219–224.
Peretz, I., &Morais, J. (1987). Analytic processing in the classification of melodies as same or different.Neuropsychologia,25, 645–652.
Peretz, I., Morais, J., &Bertelson, P. (1987). Shifting ear differences in melody recognition through strategy inducement.Brain & Cognition,6, 202–215.
PeynircioĞlu, Z. F. (1987). Inhibition through incremental fragment cuing with primed items.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,13, 569–572.
PeynircioĞlu, Z. F. (1990). Trying harder may disrupt cue utilisation.European Journal of Cognitive Psychology,2, 363–373.
PeynircioĞlu, Z. F., &Watkins, M. J. (1986). Cue-depreciation: When word fragment completion is undermined by prior exposure to lesser fragments.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,12, 426–431.
Samson, S., &Zatorre, R. J. (1988). Melodic and harmonic discrimination following unilateral cerebral excision.Brain & Cognition,7, 348–360.
Schulkind, M. D. (2000). Perceptual interference decays over short unfilled intervals.Memory & Cognition,28, 949–956.
Schulkind, M. D. (2002). Feature modulation search: A novel memory search model that extends the perceptual interference effect to musical stimuli.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,28, 346–352.
Schulkind, M. D. (2004). Conceptual and perceptual information both influence melody identification.Memory & Cognition,32, 841–851.
Schulkind, M. D., Hennis, L. K., &Rubin, D. C. (1999). Music, emotion, and autobiographical memory: They’re playing your song.Memory & Cognition,27, 948–955.
Schulkind, M. D., Shulman, R. J., &Rubin, D. C. (2003). Musical features that facilitate melody identification: How do you know it’s “your” song when they finally play it?Music Perception,21, 217–249.
Smith, J. D., Kemler Nelson, D. G., &Appleton, T. (1994). What child is this? What interval was that? Familiar tunes and music perception in novice listeners.Cognition,52, 23–54.
Snodgrass, J. G., &Hirshman, E. (1991). Theoretical explorations of the Bruner-Potter (1964) interference effect.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,30, 273–293.
Warren, P., &Marslen-Wilson, W. [D.] (1987). Continuous uptake of acoustic cues in spoken word recognition.Perception & Psychophysics,41, 262–275.
Warren, P., &Marslen-Wilson, W. [D.] (1988). Cues to lexical choice: Discriminating place and voice.Perception & Psychophysics,43, 21–30.
White, B. W. (1960). Recognition of distorted melodies.American Journal of Psychology,73, 100–107.
Yalch, R. F. (1991). Memory in a jingle jungle: Music as a mnemonic device in communicating advertising slogans.Journal of Applied Psychology,76, 268–275.
Zatorre, R. J. (1979). Recognition of dichotic melodies by musicians and nonmusicians.Neuropsychologia,17, 607–617.
Zatorre, R. J. (1985). Discrimination and recognition of tonal melodies after unilateral cerebral excisions.Neuropsychologia,23, 31–41.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schulkind, M.D. Serial processing in melody identification and the organization of musical semantic memory. Perception & Psychophysics 66, 1351–1362 (2004). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195003
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195003