Abstract
A dissociation between categorization and similarity was found by Rips (1989). In one experiment, Rips found that a stimulus halfway between a pizza and a quarter was categorized as a pizza but was rated as more similar to a quarter. Smith and Sloman (1994) discussed these results in terms of the role of necessary and characteristic features. In two experiments, participants had to learn to categorize novel artificial shapes composed of a nonsalient necessary feature combined with a salient characteristic feature. Participants categorized stimuli on the basis of a necessary feature, whereas their similarity judgments relied on characteristic features. The role of deep (essential) features in dissociations is considered. Results are discussed in terms of the differences between requirements of categorization and similarity judgments.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahn, W. K. (1998). Why are different features central for natural kinds and artifacts? The role of causal status in determining feature centrality.Cognition,69, 135–178.
Ahn, W. K., &Dennis, M. J. (2001) Dissociation between categorization and similarity judgement: Differential effect of causal status on feature weights. In U. Hahn, & M. Ramscar, (Eds),Similarity and categorization (pp. 87–107). New York: Oxford University Press.
Erickson, M. A., &Kruschke, J. K. (1998). Rules and exemplars in category learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,127, 107–140.
Estes, Z., & Hampton, J. A. (2002).Similarity and essentialism in category judgments of natural kinds. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Goldstone, R. (1994). The role of similarity in categorization: Providing a groundwork.Cognition,52, 125–157.
Hampton, J. A. (1995). Testing the prototype theory of concepts.Journal of Memory & Language,34, 686–708.
Hampton, J. A. (1998). Similarity-based categorization and fuzziness of natural categories.Cognition,65, 137–165.
Kalish, C. W. (1995). Essentialism and graded membership in animal and artifact categories.Memory & Cognition,23, 335–353.
Komatsu, L. K. (1992). Recent views of conceptual structure.Psychological Bulletin,112, 500–526.
Kroska, A., &Goldstone, R. L. (1996). Dissociations in the similarity and the categorization of emotions.Cognition & Emotion,10, 27–46.
Kruschke, J. K. (1992). ALCOVE: An exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning.Psychological Review,99, 22–44.
Malt, B. C. (1994). Water is not H2O.Cognitive Psychology,27, 41–70.
Medin, D. L., Goldstone, R. L., &Gentner, D. (1993). Respects for similarity.Psychological Review,100, 254–278.
Medin, D. L., &Ortony, A. (1989). Psychological essentialism. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.),Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 179–195). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Medin, D. L., &Schaffer, M. (1978). Context theory of classification learning.Psychological Review,85, 207–238.
Medin, D. L., Watenmaker, W. D., &Hampson, S. E. (1987). Family resemblance, conceptual cohesiveness, and category construction.Cognitive Psychology,19, 242–279.
Murphy, G. L. (2002).The big book of concepts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Murphy, G. L., &Medin, D. (1985). The role of theories in conceptual coherence.Psychological Review,92, 289–316.
Nosofsky, R. M. (1986). Attention, similarity, and the identificationcategorization relationship.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,115, 39–57.
Nosofsky, R. M., Palmeri, T. J., &McKinley, S. C. (1994). Rule-plusexception model of classification learning.Psychological Review,101, 53–79.
Rips, L. J. (1989). Similarity, typicality, and categorization. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.),Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 21–59). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rips, L. J., &Collins, A. (1993). Categories and resemblance.Journal of Experimental Psychology,122, 468–486.
Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch & B. B. Lloyd (Eds.),Cognition and categorization (pp. 27–48). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Sloman, S. A., Love, B. C., &Ahn, W. K. (1998). Feature centrality and conceptual coherence.Cognitive Science,22, 189–228.
Smith, E. E., &Medin, D. L. (1981).Categories and concepts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Smith, E. E., &Sloman, S. A. (1994). Similarity- versus rule-based categorization.Memory & Cognition,22, 377–386.
Spalding, T. L., &Murphy, G. L. (1996). Effects of background knowledge on category construction.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,22, 525–538.
Thibaut, J. P. (1997). Similarité et catégorisation.Année Psychologique,97, 701–736.
Thibaut, J. P., &Schyns, P. G. (1995). The development of feature spaces for similarity and categorization.Psychologica Belgica,35, 167–185.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Thibaut, JP., Dupont, M. & Anselme, P. Dissociations between categorization and similarity judgments as a result of learning feature distributions. Memory & Cognition 30, 647–656 (2002). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194966
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194966