Abstract
The irrelevant-speech effect refers to the finding of impaired recall performance in the presence of irrelevant auditory stimuli. Two broad classes of theories exist for the effect, both allowing automatic entry of the distracting sounds into the processing system but differing in how attention is involved. As one source of evidence in the discussion of existing theories of the irrelevant-speech effect, the performance of children and adults on a visual serial recall task with irrelevant sounds (speech and tones) was examined. The magnitude of the effects of irrelevant sounds on performance decreased with age. The developmental differences were marked in the conditions with the greatest need for attentional control (words and especially changing words). The findings were interpreted with respect to current models of memory. Theories of the irrelevant-speech effect that include a role for attentional control were better suited to handle the results than those without a specified role for attention.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Baddeley, A. D. (1986).Working memory. New York: Oxford University Press.
Baddeley, A. D. (2000a). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory?Trends in Cognitive Sciences,4, 417–423.
Baddeley, A. D. (2000b). The phonological loop and the irrelevant speech effect: Some comments on Neath (2000).Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,7, 544–549.
Baddeley, A. D., &Hitch, G. J. (2000). Development of working memory: Should the Pascual-Leone and the Baddeley and Hitch models be merged?Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,77, 128–137.
Bjorklund, D. F., &Douglas, R. N. (1997). The development of memory strategies. In N. Cowan (Ed.),The development of memory in childhood (pp. 201–246). Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
Boyle, R., &Coltheart, V. (1996). Effects of irrelevant sounds on phonological coding in reading comprehension and short-term memory.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,49A, 398–416.
Carroll, J. B., Davies, P., &Richman, B. (1971).The American heritage word frequency book. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Case, R. (1992). The role of the frontal lobes in the regulation of cognitive development.Brain & Cognition,20, 51–73.
Chi, M. T. (1977). Age differences in memory span.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,23, 266–281.
Colle, H. A., &Welsh, A. (1976). Acoustic masking in primary memory.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,15, 17–31.
Cowan, N. (1995).Attention and memory: An integrated framework (Oxford Psychology Series, No. 26). New York: Oxford University Press.
Cowan, N. (1997). The development of working memory. In N. Cowan (Ed.),The development of memory in children (pp. 163–199). Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
Cowan, N., Nugent, L. D., Elliott, E. M., Ponomarev, I., &Saults, J. S. (1999). The role of attention in the development of shortterm memory: Age differences in the verbal span of apprehension.Child Development,70, 1082–1097.
Cowan, N., Saults, J. S., &Elliott, E. M. (2002). Some methods to examine the development of basic parameters of working memory. In R. Kail & H. Reese (Eds.),Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 29, pp. 1–49). San Diego: Academic Press.
Dempster, F. N. (1993). Resistance to interference: Developmental changes in a basic processing mechanism. In M. L. Howe & R. Pasnak (Eds.),Emerging themes in cognitive development (pp. 3–27). New York: Springer-Verlag.
D’Esposito, M., Detre, J. A., Alsop, D. C., Shin, R. K., Atlas, S., &Grossman, M. (1995). The neural basis of the central executive system of working memory.Nature,378, 279–281.
Doyle, A. (1973). Listening to distraction: A developmental study of selective attention.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,15, 100–115.
Ellermeier, W., &Hellbrück, J. (1998). Is level irrelevant in “irrelevant speech”? Effects of loudness, signal-to-noise ratio, and binaural masking.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 1406–1414.
Elliott, E. M., &Cowan, N. (2001). Habituation to auditory distractors in a cross-modal, color-word interference task.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,27, 654–667.
Engle, R. W., Kane, M. J., &Tuholski, S. W. (1999). Individual differences in working memory capacity and what they tell us about controlled attention, general fluid intelligence, and functions of the prefrontal cortex. In A. Miyake & P. Shah (Eds.),Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 102–134). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Flavell, J., Beach, D., &Chinsky, J. (1966). Spontaneous verbal rehearsal in a memory task as a function of age.Child Development,37, 283–299.
Guttentag, R. (1984). The mental effort requirement of cumulative rehearsal: A developmental study.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,37, 92–106.
Hale, S., Bronik, M. D., &Fry, A. F. (1997). Verbal and spatial working memory in school-age children: Developmental differences in susceptibility to interference.Developmental Psychology,33, 364–371.
Harnishfeger, K. K., &Pope, R. S. (1996). Intending to forget: The development of cognitive inhibition in directed forgetting.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,62, 292–315.
Hasher, L., Stoltzfus, E., Zacks, R. T., &Rypma, B. (1991). Age and inhibition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 163–169.
Hellbrück, J., Kuwano, S., &Namba, S. (1996). Irrelevant background speech and human performance: Is there long-term habituation?Journal of the Acoustical Society of Japan,17, 239–247.
Jones, D. M. (1993). Objects, streams, and threads of auditory attention. In A. D. Baddeley & L. Weiskrantz (Eds.),Attention: Selection, awareness, and control: A tribute to Donald Broadbent (pp. 87–104). Oxford: Oxford University Press, Clarendon Press.
Jones, D. M., &Macken, W. J. (1993). Irrelevant tones produce an irrelevant speech effect: Implications for phonological coding in working memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 369–381.
Jones, D. M., &Macken, W. J. (1995). Phonological similarity in the irrelevant speech effect: Within- or between-stream similarity?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 103–115.
Jones, D. M., Macken, W. J., &Murray, A. C. (1993). Disruption of visual short-term memory by changing-state auditory stimuli: The role of segmentation.Memory & Cognition,21, 318–328.
Jones, D. M., Madden, C., &Miles, C. (1992). Privileged access by irrelevant speech to short-term memory: The role of changing state.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,44A, 645–669.
Jones, D. M., &Tremblay, S. (2000). Interference in memory by process or content? A reply to Neath (2000).Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,7, 550–558.
Lane, D. M., &Pearson, D. A. (1982). The development of selective attention.Merrill-Palmer Quarterly,28, 317–337.
LeCompte, D. C. (1994). Extending the irrelevant speech effect beyond serial recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 1396–1408.
LeCompte, D. C. (1995). An irrelevant speech effect with repeated and continuous background speech.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,2, 391–397.
LeCompte, D. C., Neely, C. B., &Wilson, J. R. (1997). Irrelevant speech and irrelevant tones: The relative importance of speech to the irrelevant sound effect.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 472–483.
Lorch, E. P., Anderson, D. R., &Well, A. D. (1984). The effects of irrelevant information on speeded classification tasks: Interference is reduced by habituation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,10, 850–864.
Macken, W. J., Mosdell, N., &Jones, D. M. (1999). Explaining the irrelevant-sound effect: Temporal distinctiveness or changing-state?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,25, 810–814.
McCormack, T., Brown, G. D. A., &Vousden, J. I. (2000). The development of serial recall: Implications for short-term memory development.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,76, 222–252.
Miles, C., Jones, D. M., &Madden, C. A. (1991). Locus of the irrelevant speech effect in short-term memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 578–584.
Nairne, J. S. (1990). A feature model of immediate memory.Memory & Cognition,18, 251–269.
Neath, I. (2000). Modeling the effects of irrelevant speech on memory.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,7, 403–423.
Neath, I., &Nairne, J. S. (1995). Word-length effects in immediate memory: Overwriting trace decay theory.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,2, 429–441.
Ornstein, P. A., Naus, M. J., &Liberty, C. (1975). Rehearsal and organizational processes in children’s memory.Child Development,46, 818–830.
Rouleau, N., &Belleville, S. (1996). Irrelevant speech effect in aging: An assessment of inhibitory processes in working memory.Journal of Gerontology,51, 356–363.
Salamé, P., &Baddeley, A. D. (1982). Disruption of short-term memory by unattended speech: Implications for the structure of working memory.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,21, 150–164.
Salamé, P., &Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Phonological factors in STM: Similarity and the unattended speech effect.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,24, 263–265.
Schneider, W. (1988). Micro-Experimental laboratory: An integrated system for the IBM-PC compatibles.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,20, 206–217.
Sokolov, E. N. (1963).Perception and the conditioned reflex. Elmsford, NY: Pergamon.
Tipper, S. P., Bourque, T. A., Anderson, S. H., &Brehaut, J. C. (1989). Mechanisms of attention: A developmental study.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,48, 353–378.
Towse, J. N., Hitch, G. J., &Hutton, U. (1998). A reevaluation of working memory capacity in children.Journal of Memory & Language,39, 195–217.
Tremblay, S., &Jones, D. M. (1998). Role of habituation in the irrelevantsound effect: Evidence from the effects of token set size and rate of transition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 659–671.
Tremblay, S., &Jones, D. M. (1999). Change of intensity fails to produce an irrelevant sound effect: Implications for the representation of unattended sound.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,25, 1005–1015.
Waters, W. F., McDonald, D. G., &Koresko, R. L. (1977). Habituation of the orienting response: A gating mechanism subserving selective attention.Psychophysiology,14, 228–236.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Elliott, E.M. The irrelevant-speech effect and children: theoretical implications of developmental change. Memory & Cognition 30, 478–487 (2002). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194948
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194948