Abstract
In recognition tests, items presented in unusual ways (e.g., degraded, revealed in stages, or presented as anagrams) are often judged to be old more than are intact items. Thisrevelation effect has been observed only in episodic judgments about the occurrence or frequency of relatively recent events. The present work extends the boundary conditions of this effect. In three experiments, subjects unscrambled anagrams in the context of answering questions about their childhood (e.g.,broke a dwniwo playing ball) or while answering questions pertaining to world knowledge (e.g.,fastest animal—elpraod). In each case, a revelation effect was observed: Solving an anagram increased confidence in remote autobiographical memories and in memory for world facts. These results contradict claims that the effect is an episodic memory phenomenon and challenge existing explanations of the revelation effect.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Arkes, H. R., Hackett, C., &Boehm, L. (1989). The generality of the relation between familiarity and judged validity.Journal of Behavioral Decision Making,2, 81–94.
Bacon, F. T. (1979). Credibility of repeated statements: Memory for trivia.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,5, 241–252.
Begg, I., &Armour, V. (1991). Repetition and the ring of truth.Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science,23, 195–213.
Bernstein, D. M. (2001).Remembering and believing depend: A processing account. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC.
Bornstein, B. H., &Neely, C. B. (2001). The revelation effect in frequency judgment.Memory & Cognition,29, 209–213.
Cameron, T. E., &Hockley, W. E. (2000). The revelation effect for item and associative recognition: Familiarity versus recollection.Memory & Cognition,28, 176–183.
Frigo, L. C., Reas, D. L., &LeCompte, D. C. (1999). Revelation without presentation: Counterfeit study list yields robust revelation effect.Memory & Cognition,27, 339–343.
Garry, M., Manning, C. G., Loftus, E. F., &Sherman, S. J. (1996). Imagination inflation: Imagining a childhood event inflates confidence that it occurred.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,3, 208–214.
Gillund, G., &Shiffrin, R. M. (1984). A retrieval model for both recognition and recall.Psychological Review,91, 1–67.
Hasher, L., Goldstein, D., &Toppino, T. (1977). Frequency and the conference of referential validity.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,16, 107–112.
Heaps, C., &Nash, M. (1999). Individual differences in imagination inflation.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,6, 313–318.
Hicks, J. L., &Marsh, R. L. (1998). A decrement-to-familiarity interpretation of the revelation effect from forced-choice tests of recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 1105–1120.
Hintzman, D. L. (1988). Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model.Psychological Review,95, 528–551.
Horselenberg, R., Merckelbach, H., Muris, P., Rassin, E., Sijsenaar, M., &Spaan, V. (2000). Imagining fictitious childhood events.Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy,7, 128–137.
Kučera, H., &Francis, W. N. (1967).Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
Landau, J. D. (2001). Altering the balance of recollection and familiarity influences the revelation effect.American Journal of Psychology,114, 425–437.
LeCompte, D.C. (1995). Recollective experience in the revelation effect: Separating the contributions of recollection and familiarity.Memory & Cognition,23, 324–334.
Luo, R. (1993). Enhanced feeling of recognition: Effect of identifying and manipulating test items on recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 405–413.
Manning, C. G. (2000).Imagination inflation with posttest delays: How long will it last? Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle.
Mazzoni, G. A. L., Loftus, E. F., &Kirsch, I. (2001). Changing beliefs about implausible autobiographical events: A little plausibility goes a long way.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied,7, 51–59.
Nelson, T. O., &Narens, L. (1980). Norms of 300 general-information questions: Accuracy of recall, latency of recall, and feeling-of-knowing ratings.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,19, 338–368.
Niewiadomski, M. W., &Hockley, W. E. (2001). Interrupting recognition memory: Tests of familiarity-based accounts of the revelation effect.Memory & Cognition,29, 1130–1138.
Paddock, J. R., Joseph, A. L., Chan, F. M., Terranova, S., Manning, C., &Loftus, E. F. (1998). When guided visualization procedures may backfire: Imagination inflation and predicting individual differences in suggestibility.Applied Cognitive Psychology,12, S63-S75.
Peynircioĝlu, Z. F., &Tekcan, A. I. (1993). Revelation effect: Effort priming does not create the sense of familiarity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 382–388.
Watkins, M. J., &Peynircioĝlu, Z. F. (1990). The revelation effect: When disguising test items induces recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 1012–1020.
Westerman, D. L. (2000). Recollection-based recognition eliminates the revelation effect in memory.Memory & Cognition,28, 167–175.
Westerman, D. L., &Greene, R. L. (1996). On the generality of the revelation effect.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,22, 1147–1153.
Westerman, D. L., &Greene, R. L. (1998). The revelation that the revelation effect is not due to revelation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 377–386.
Whittlesea, B. W. A. (2002). False memory and the discrepancy-attribution hypothesis: The prototype-familiarity illusion.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,131, 96–115.
]Whittlesea, B. W. A., & Leboe, J. (2001). Fluency-based versus discrepancy-based attributions: Evidence from classification and remembering. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Whittlesea, B. W. A., &Williams, L. D. (1998). Why do strangers feel familiar, but friends don’t? The unexpected basis of feelings of familiarity.Acta Psychologica,98, 141–166.
Whittlesea, B. W. A., &Williams, L. D. (2000). The source of feelings of familiarity: The discrepancy-attribution hypothesis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 547–565.
Whittlesea, B. W. A., &Williams, L. D. (2001a). The discrepancy-attribution hypothesis: I. The heuristic basis of feelings of familiarity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,27, 3–13.
Whittlesea, B. W. A., &Williams, L. D. (2001b). The discrepancy-attribution hypothesis: II. Expectation, uncertainty, surprise, and feelings of familiarity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,27, 14–33.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
D.M.B. gratefully acknowledges NIH support from a National Research Service Award.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bernstein, D.M., Whittlesea, B.W.A. & Loftus, E.F. Increasing confidence in remote autobiographical memory and general knowledge: Extensions of the revelation effect. Memory & Cognition 30, 432–438 (2002). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194943
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194943