Abstract
The present experiments adapt a memory framework (source monitoring) to the study of closure processes. Closure processes are invoked as explanatory mechanisms underlying the ability to identify objects under conditions of incomplete visual information. If closure processes are activated, filling in missing pieces of visual information, intriguing memory predictions follow. When making source judgments about the way in which visual information was experienced initially (e.g., complete or incomplete in form), a particular kind of memory error should be evident. Incomplete visual information should be remembered as complete in form, and indeed, this error is observed. The present experiments test alternative interpretations for the initial reports of this memory error in the context of a search task modeled after theWhere’s Waldo? children’s books. The effects of several new factors (e.g., familiarity) are reported, and alternative interpretations for the bias to reportcomplete are eliminated. Findings, therefore, have implications for understanding the mechanisms of closure processes, as well as for the source-monitoring framework itself.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Akins, K. A. (Ed.) (1996).Perception. New York: Oxford University Press.
Akins, K. A., &Winger, S. (1996). Ships in the night: Churchland and Ramachandran on Dennett’s theory of consciousness. In K. A. Akins (Ed.),Perception (pp. 173–197). New York: Oxford University Press.
Batchelder, W. H., &Riefer, D. M. (1990). Multinomial processing models of source monitoring.Psychological Review,97, 548–564.
Behrmann, M., Zemel, R. S., &Mozer, M. C. (1998). Object-based attention and occlusion: Evidence from normal participants and a computational model.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 1011–1036.
Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding.Psychological Review,94, 115–147.
Bregman, A. (1981). Asking the “what for” question in auditory perception. In M. Kobovy & J. R. Pomerantz (Eds.),Perceptual Organization (pp. 99–119). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Brown, J. M., &Koch, C. (1993). Influences of closure, occlusion and size on the perception of fragmented pictures.Perception & Psychophysics,53, 436–442.
Churchland, P. S., &Ramachandran, V. S. (1996). Filling in: Why Dennett is wrong. In K. A. Akins (Ed.),Perception (pp. 132–157). New York: Oxford University Press.
Dennett, D. C. (1992). “Filling in” versus finding out: A ubiquitous confusion in cognitive science. In H. L. Pick, Jr., P. van den Broek, & D. C. Knill (Eds.),Cognition: Conceptual and methodological issues (pp. 33–49). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Dennett, D. C. (1996). Seeing is believing—or is it? In K. A. Akins (Ed.),Perception (pp. 158–172). New York: Oxford University Press.
Durgin, F. H. (1995). On the filling in of the visual blind spot: Some rules of thumb.Perception,24, 827–840.
Durso, F. T., &Johnson, M. K. (1980). The effects of orienting tasks on recognition, recall and modality confusion of pictures and words.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,19, 416–429.
Finke, R. A., Johnson, M. K., &Shyi, G. (1988). Memory confusions for real and imagined completions of symmetrical visual patterns.Memory & Cognition,16, 133–137.
Foley, M. A., Durso, F. T., Wilder, A., &Friedman, R. (1991). Developmental comparisons of the effects of explicit vs. implicit imagery generation on reality monitoring.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,51, 1–13.
]Foley, M. A., Foley, H. J., Durley, J., & Maitner, A. (2002).Source monitoring and cognitive operations: Memory for problem type, operations and solution source. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Foley, M. A., Foley, H. J., Durso, F. T., &Smith, N. K. (1997). Investigations of closure processes: What source-monitoring judgments suggest about what is “closing.”Memory & Cognition,25, 140–155.
]Foley, M. A., Foley, H. J., Scheye, R., Manning, A., & Smith, S. (2002).Implicit processing and source monitoring errors: A study of memory for the way in which objects are experienced. Manuscript in preparation.
Foley, M. A., &Ratner, H. H. (2001). The role of action-based structures in activity memory. In H. D. Zimmer, R. L. Cohen, M. J. Guynn, J. Engelkamp, R. Kormi-Nouri, & M. A. Foley (Eds.),Memory for action (pp. 112–135). New York: Oxford University Press.
Gollin, E. S. (1962). Factors affecting the visual recognition of incomplete objects: A comparative investigation of children and adults.Perceptual & Motor Skills,15, 583–590.
Hearst, E. (1991). Psychology and nothing.American Scientist,79, 432–443.
Henkel, L. A., Franklin, N., &Johnson, M. K. (2000). Cross-modal source monitoring confusions between perceived and imagined events.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 321–335.
Hoffman, H. G. (1997). Role of memory strength in reality monitoring decisions: Evidence from source attribution biases.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 371–383.
Johnson, M. K., Foley, M. A., &Leach, K. (1988). The consequences for memory of imagining in another person’s voice.Memory & Cognition,16, 337–342.
Johnson, M. K., Foley, M. A., Suengas, A., &Raye, C. L. (1988). Phenomenal characteristics of memories for perceived and imagined autobiographical events.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,117, 371–376.
Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., &Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring.Psychological Bulletin,114, 3–28.
Johnson, M. K., &Raye, C. L. (1981). Reality monitoring.Psychological Review,88, 67–85.
Johnson, M. K. &Raye, C. L. (2000). Cognitive and brain mechanisms of false memories and beliefs. In D. L. Schacter & E. Scarry (Eds.),Memory, brain and belief (pp. 35–86). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Johnson, M. K., Raye, C. L., Foley, H. J., &Foley, M. A. (1981). Cognitive operations and decision bias in reality monitoring.American Journal of Psychology,94, 37–64.
Johnson, M. K., Raye, C. L., Foley, M. A., &Kim, J. (1982). Pictures and images: Spatial and temporal information compared.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,19, 23–26.
Kanizsa, G., &Gerbino, W. (1982). Amodal completion: Seeing or thinking? In J. Beck (Ed.),Organization and representation in perception (pp. 167–190). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kellman, P. J., &Shipley, T. F. (1991). A theory of visual interpolation in object perception.Cognitive Psychology,23, 141–2211.
Kimchi, R. (1992). Primacy of wholistic processing and global/local paradigm: A critical review.Psychological Bulletin,112, 24–38.
Leeper, R. (1935). A study of a neglected portion of the field of learning: The development of sensory organization.Journal of Genetic Psychology,46, 41–75.
McClelland, J. L., &Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Pt. 2. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests of the extension of the model.Psychological Review,89, 60–94.
Nakayama, K., Shimojo, S., &Ramachandran, V. S. (1990). Transparency: Relation to depth, subjective contours, luminance, and neon color spreading.Perception,19, 497–513.
Pessoa, L., Thompson, E., &Noe, A. (1998). Finding out about filling-in: A guide to perceptual completion for visual science and the philosophy of perception.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,21, 723–802.
Sekuler, A. B. (1994). Local and global minima in visual completion: Effects of symmetry and orientation.Perception,23, 529–545.
Sekuler, A. B., &Palmer, S. E. (1992). Perception of partly occluded objects: A microgenetic analysis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,121, 95–111.
Sekuler, A. B., Palmer, S. E., &Flynn, C. (1994). Local and global processes in visual completion.Psychological Science,5, 260–267.
Snodgrass, J. G., &Feenan, K. (1990). Priming effects in picture fragment completion: Support for the perceptual closure hypothesis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,119, 276–296.
Snodgrass, J. G., &Kinjo, H. (1998). On the generality of the perceptual closure effect.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 645–658.
Snodgrass, J. G., &Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,6, 174–215.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
—Accepted by previous editorial team
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Foley, M.A., Foley, H.J. & Korenman, L.M. Adapting a memory framework (source monitoring) to the study of closure processes. Memory & Cognition 30, 412–422 (2002). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194941
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194941