Abstract
In four experiments, we examined the impact of perceptual properties on the effectiveness of diagrams in analogical problem solving, using variants ofconvergence diagrams as source analogues for the radiation problem. Static diagrams representing the initial problematic state (one large line directed at a target) and the final state for a convergence solution (multiple converging lines) were not accessed spontaneously but were often used successfully once a hint to consider the diagram had been provided. The inaccessibility of static diagrams was not alleviated by adding additional diagrams to represent intermediate states (Experiment 1), but spontaneous access was improved by augmenting static diagrams with a verbal statement of the convergence principle (Experiment 3). Spontaneous retrieval and noticing were increased markedly by animating displays representing converging forces and thereby encouraging encoding of the lines as indicating motion toward a target (Experiments 3 and 4). However, neither static nor animated diagrams were effective when the arrows were reversed to imply divergence rather than convergence (Experiment 2). The results indicate that when animation encourages the interpretation of a diagram as a helpful source analogue, it can greatly enhance analogical transfer.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Beveridge, M., &Parkins, E. (1987). Visual representation in analogical problem solving.Memory & Cognition,15, 230–237.
Bishop, Y.M.M., Fienberg, S. E., &Holland, P.W. (1975).Discrete multivariate analysis: Theory and practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Catrambone, R., &Holyoak, K. J. (1989). Overcoming contextual limitations on problem-solving transfer.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 1147–1156.
Chen, Z. (1995). Analogical transfer: From schematic pictures to problem solving.Memory & Cognition,23, 255–269.
Duncker, K. (1945). On problem solving.Psychological Monographs,58 (Whole No. 270).
Ferguson, E. L., &Hegarty, M. (1995). Learning with real machines or diagrams: Application of knowledge to real-world problems.Cognition & Instruction,13, 129–160.
Funt, B. V. (1995). Problem solving with diagrammatic representations. In J. Glasgow, N. H. Narayanan, & B. Chandrasekaran (Eds.),Diagrammatic reasoning: Cognitive and computational perspectives (pp. 33–68). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gattis, M., &Holyoak, K. J. (1996). Mapping conceptual to spatial relations in visual reasoning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,22, 231–239.
Gentner, D., &Gentner, D. R. (1983). Flowing waters or teeming crowds: Mental models of electricity. In D. Gentner & A. L. Stevens (Eds.),Mental models (pp. 99–129). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Gick, M. L. (1985). The effect of diagram retrieval cue on spontaneous analogical transfer.Canadian Journal of Psychology,39, 460–466.
Gick, M. L., &Holyoak, K. J. (1980). Analogical problem solving.Cognitive Psychology,12, 306–355.
Gick, M. L., &Holyoak, K. J. (1983). Schema induction and analogical transfer.Cognitive Psychology,15, 1–28.
Hegarty, M. (1991). Knowledge and processes in mechanical problem solving. In R. J. Sternberg & P. A. Frensch (Eds.),Complex problem solving: Principles and mechanisms (pp. 253–285). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Hegarty, M. (1992). Mental animation: Inferring motion from static displays of mechanical systems.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 1084–1102.
Hegarty, M. (1995). Mental animation. In J. Glasgow, N. H. Narayanan, & B. Chandrasekaran (Eds),mmatic reasoning: Cognitive and computational perspectives (pp. 535–576). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hegarty, M., &Just, M. A. (1993). Constructing mental models of machines from text and diagrams.Journal of Memory & Language,32, 717–742.
Hegarty, M., Just, M. A., &Morrison, I. R. (1988). Mental models of mechanical systems: Individual differences in qualitative and quantitative reasoning.Cognitive Psychology,20, 191–236.
Holyoak, K. J., Junn, E. N., &Billman, D. (1984). Development of analogical problem-solving skill.Child Development,55, 2042–2055.
Holyoak, K. J., &Koh, K. (1987). Surface and structural similarity in analogical transfer.Memory & Cognition,15, 332–340.
Holyoak, K. J., &Thagard, P. (1995).Mental leaps: Analogy in creative thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hummel, J. E., &Holyoak, K. J. (1997). Distributed representations of structure: A theory of analogical access and mapping.Psychological Review,104, 427–466.
Keane, M. T. (1986). On retrieving analogues when solving problems.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,39A, 29–41.
Mayer, R. E., &Gallini, J. K. (1990). When is an illustration worth ten thousand words?Journal of Educational Psychology,82, 715–726.
Ross, B. (1987). This is like that: The use of earlier problems and the separation of similarity effects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,13, 629–639.
Ross, B. (1989). Distinguishing types of superficial similarities: Different effects on the access and use of earlier problems.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 456–468.
Shah, P., Hegarty, M., &Mayer, R. E. (1999). Graphs as aids to knowledge construction: Signaling techniques for guiding the process of graph comprehension.Journal of Educational Psychology,91, 690–702.
Spencer, R.M., &Weisberg, R.W. (1986). Context-dependent effects on analogical transfer.Memory & Cognition,14, 442–449.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by NSF Grant SBR-9729023.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pedone, R., Hummel, J.E. & Holyoak, K.J. The use of diagrams in analogical problem solving. Memory & Cognition 29, 214–221 (2001). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194915
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194915