Abstract
Five search experiments investigated whether the apparent size of objects is, like their retinal size, coded in preattentive vision. Observers searched for a target circle that was either larger or smaller than distractor circles, with both types of test circles surrounded by context circles modulating apparent size (i.e., the Ebbinghaus illusion). The size ratio between the test and the context circles was manipulated in such a way that the test circles were surrounded by, for example, smaller context circles (making the larger target appear even larger) or by larger context circles (making the smaller distractors appear even smaller). Under optimal conditions, the detection reaction times were independent of the number of test circles in the display, and the Ebbinghaus illusion facilitated the detection of the target even in comparison with control conditions without any context circles. This finding is consistent with preattentive, spatially parallel processing of apparent size.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Aks, D. J., &Enns, J. T. (1996). Visual search for size is influenced by a background texture gradient.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,22, 1467–1481.
Cave, K. R., &Wolfe, J. M. (1990). Modeling the role of parallel processing in visual search.Cognitive Psychology,22, 225–271.
Cooper, L. A., &Weintraub, D. J. (1970). Delboeuf-type circle illusion: Interactions among luminance, temporal characteristics, and inducingfigure variation.Journal of Experimental Psychology,85, 75–82.
Coren, S. (1971). A size-contrast illusion without physical size differences.American Journal of Psychology,84, 565–566.
Duncan, J., &Humphreys, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity.Psychological Review,96, 433–458.
Ebbinghaus, H. (1913).Grundzüge der Psychologie. Leipzig: Veit.
Egeth, H. E., Virzi, R. A., &Garbart, H. (1984). Searching for conjunctively defined targets.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,10, 32–39.
Found, A. (1997).Visual search: Process and representation. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of London.
Found, A., &Müller, H. J. (2001). Efficient search for size targets on a background texture gradient: Is detection guided by discontinuities in the retinal-size gradient of items?Perception,30, 21–48.
Franz, V. H., Bülthoff, H. H., &Fahle, M. (2003). Grasp effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion: Obstacle avoidance is not the explanation.Experimental Brain Research,149, 470–477.
Haffenden, A. M., Schiff, K. C., &Goodale, M. A. (2001). The dissociation between perception and action in the Ebbinghaus illusion: Nonillusory effects of pictorial cues on grasp.Current Biology,11, 177–181.
Hodsoll, J. P. (2002).The role of top-down processes in visual search for targets defined by linear and categorical separability. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Birmingham, U.K.
Humphreys, G. W., Keulers, N., &Donnelly, N. (1994). Parallel visual coding in three dimensions.Perception,23, 453–470.
Jaeger, T., &Pollack, R. H. (1977). Effect of contrast level and temporal order on the Ebbinghaus circles illusion.Perception & Psychophysics,21, 83–87.
Kaptein, N. A., Theeuwes, J., &van der Heijden, A. H. C. (1995). Search for a conjunctively defined target can be selectively limited to a color-defined subset of elements.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,21, 1053–1069.
Massaro, D. W., &Anderson, N. H. (1971). Judgmental model of the Ebbinghaus illusion.Journal of Experimental Psychology,89, 147–151.
Müller, H. J., & Busch, A. (2004).Visual search for size-defined target objects is modulated by the Ebbinghaus illusion: Facilitatory and inhibitory effects of the context objects. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Müller, H. J., Heller, D., &Ziegler, J. (1995). Visual search for singleton feature targets within and across feature dimensions.Perception & Psychophysics,57, 1–17.
Olivers, C. N. L., Watson, D. G., &Humphreys, G. W. (1999). Visual marking of locations and feature maps: Evidence from withindimension defined conjunctions.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,52A, 679–715.
Papathomas, T. V., Feher, A., Julesz, B., &Zeevi, Y. (1996). Interactions of monocular and cyclopean components and the role of depth in the Ebbinghaus illusion.Perception,25, 783–795.
Pashler, H. (1987). Detecting conjunctions of color and form: Reassessing the serial search hypothesis.Perception & Psychophysics,41, 191–201.
Segalowitz, S. J., &Graves, R. E. (1990). Suitability of the IBM XT, AT, and PS/2 keyboard, mouse, and game port as response devices in reaction time paradigms.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,22, 283–289.
Treisman, A. (1988). Features and objects: The Fourteenth Bartlett Memorial Lecture.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,40A, 201–237.
Treisman, A. M., &Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention.Cognitive Psychology,12, 97–136.
Treisman, A., &Gormican, S. (1988). Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence from search asymmetries.Psychological Review,95, 15–48.
Treisman, A., &Sato, S. (1990). Conjunction search revisited.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 459–478.
Watson, D. G., &Humphreys, G. W. (1997). Visual marking: Prioritizing selection for new objects by top-down attentional inhibition of old objects.Psychological Review,104, 90–122.
Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided Search 2.0: A revised model of visual search.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,1, 202–238.
Wolfe, J. M. (1998). Visual search. In H. Pashler (Ed.),Attention (pp. 13–73). Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by a grant from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (MU 773/2-3).
Note—This article was accepted by the previous editorial team, headed by Neil Macmillan.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Busch, A., Müller, H.J. The Ebbinghaus illusion modulates visual search for size-defined targets: Evidence for preattentive processing of apparent object size. Perception & Psychophysics 66, 475–495 (2004). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194895
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194895