Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us Track your research
Search
Cart
  1. Home
  2. Perception & Psychophysics
  3. Article

Nasal trigeminal chemosensitivity across the adult life span

  • Published: January 2003
  • Volume 65, pages 115–122, (2003)
  • Cite this article
Download PDF
Perception & Psychophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript
Nasal trigeminal chemosensitivity across the adult life span
Download PDF
  • Charles J. Wysocki1,
  • Beverly J. Cowart1 &
  • Tomas Radil2 
  • 876 Accesses

  • Explore all metrics

Abstract

Individuals can determine the side of the nose that receives an odorant during unilateral presentation (lateralize) if endings of the trigeminal nerve are stimulated. By using psychophysical methods, olfactory detection and trigeminal lateralization thresholds for l-butanol were obtained from 142 individuals ranging in age from 20 to 89 years. Sensitivity in both chemosensory pathways declined with advancing age, especially in people older than 60 years.

Article PDF

Download to read the full article text

Similar content being viewed by others

Correlation between olfactory function, trigeminal sensitivity, and nasal anatomy in healthy subjects

Article 06 March 2019

Chemosensory Function in Congenitally Blind or Deaf Teenagers

Article 14 November 2015

Olfactory Function

Chapter © 2020
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

References

  • American Society for Testing and Materials (1997).Standard Practices for Referencing Suprathreshold Odor Intensity [Standard E544-75 (1988) e1]. West Conshohocken, PA: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Békésy, G. von (1964). Olfactory analogue to directional hearing.Journal of Applied Physiology,19, 369–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellas, D., Novelly, R. A., &Eskenazi, B. (1989). Olfactory lateralization and identification in right hemisphere lesion and control patients.Neuropsychologia,27, 1187–1191.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cain, W. S. (1976). Olfaction and the common chemical sense: Some psychophysical contrasts.Sensory Processes,1, 57–67.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cain, W. S., &Murphy, C. L. (1980). Interactions between chemoreceptive modalities of odour and irritation.Nature,284, 255–257.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cain, W. S., &Stevens, J. C. (1989). Uniformity of olfactory loss in aging. In C. L. Murphy, W. S. Cain, & D. M. Hegsted (Eds.),Chemical senses and nutrition in aging (Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 561, pp. 29–38). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coates, E. L. (2001). Olfactory CO2 chemoreceptors.Respiration Physiology,129, 219–229.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cometto-Muñiz, J. E., Cain, W. S., Hiraishi, T., Abraham, M. H., &Gola, J. M. R. (2000). Comparison of two stimulus-delivery systems for measurement of nasal pungency thresholds.Chemical Senses,25, 285–291.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cometto-Muñiz, J. E., &Noriega, G. (1985). Gender differences in the perception of pungency.Physiology & Behavior,34, 385–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowart, B. J. (1989). Relationships between taste and smell across the adult life span. In C. L. Murphy, W. S. Cain, & D. M. Hegsted (Eds.),Chemical senses and nutrition in aging (Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 561, pp. 39–55). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowart, B. J. (1998). The addition of CO2 to traditional taste solutions alters taste quality.Chemical Senses,23, 397–402.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cui, L., &Evans, W. J. (1997). Olfactory event-related potentials to amyl acetate in congenital anosmia.Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology,102, 303–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doty, R. L., Brugger, W. E., Jurs, P. C., Orndorff, M. A., Snyder, P. J., &Lowry, L. D. (1978). Intranasal trigeminal stimulation from odorous volatiles: Psychometric responses from anosmic and normal humans.Physiology & Behavior,20, 175–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doty, R. L., Shaman, P., Applebaum, S. L., Giberson, R., Siksorski,L., &Rosenberg, L. (1984). Smell identification ability: Changes with age.Science,22, 1441–1443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hummel, T., Barz, S., Lötsch, J., Roscher, S., Kettenmann, B., &Kobal, G. (1996). Loss of olfactory function leads to a decrease of trigeminal sensitivity.Chemical Senses,21, 75–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hummel, T., Barz, S., Pauli, E., &Kobal, G. (1998). Chemosensory event-related potentials change with age.Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology,108, 208–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hummel, T., &Livermore, A. (2002). Intranasal chemosensory function of the trigeminal nerve and aspects of its relation to olfaction.International Archives of Occupational & Environmental Health,75, 305–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, T., &Rouby, C. (1992). Human capacity to localize mononarinal odor stimuli.Chemical Senses,17, 845–846.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendal-Reed, M., &Walker, J. C. (1997). Sensory and respiratory responses of normals and anosmics to CO2 presented by precision olfactometer.Chemical Senses,22, 717.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendal-Reed, M., Walker, J. C., Morgan, W. T., LaMacchio, M., &Lutz, R. W. (1998). Human responses to propionic acid: I. Quantification of within- and between-participant variation in perception by normosmics and anosmics.Chemical Senses,23, 71–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keverne, E. B., Murphy, C. L., Silver, W. L., Wysocki, C. J., &Meredith, M. (1986). Non-olfactory chemoreceptors of the nose: Recent advances in understanding the vomeronasal and trigeminal systems.Chemical Senses,11, 119–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kobal, G., &Hummel, T. (1991). Olfactory evoked potentials in humans. In T. V. Getchell, R. L. Doty, L. M. Bartoshuk, & J. B. Snow, Jr. (Eds.),Smell and taste in health and disease (pp. 255–275). New York: Raven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kobal, G., Van Toller, S., &Hummel, T. (1989). Is there directional smelling?Experientia,45, 130–132.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laska, M. (2001). Perception of trigeminal chemosensory qualities in the elderly.Chemical Senses,26, 681–689.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Medina, M. R. G., &Cain, W. S. (1982). Bilateral integration in the common chemical sense.Physiology & Behavior,29, 349–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prah, J. D., &Benignus, V. A. (1984). Trigeminal sensitivity to contact chemical stimulation: A new method and some results.Perception & Psychophysics,35, 65–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radil, T., &Wysocki, C. J. (2000). Butanol detection and lateralization: Conscious and unconscious mechanisms [Abstract].Chemical Senses,25, 624.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roscher, S., Glaser, C., Hummel, T., &Kobal, G. (1996). An easy method for separating olfactory from trigeminal stimulation.Chemical Senses,21, 492–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shusterman, D., &Balmes, J. (1997). Measurement of nasal irritant sensitivity to pulsed carbon dioxide: A pilot study.Archives of Environmental Health,52, 334–340.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Skramlik, E. von (1925). Über die Lokalisation der Empfindungen bei den niederen Sinnen [On the localization of sensation in the lower senses].Zeitschrift für Sinnesphysiologie,56, 69–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, J. C., &Cain, W. S. (1986). Aging and the perception of nasal irritation.Physiology & Behavior,37, 323–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, J. C., Plantinga, A., &Cain, W. S. (1982). Reduction of odor and nasal pungency associated with aging.Neurobiology of Aging,3, 125–132.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wysocki, C. J., Cowart, B. J., &Varga, E. (1997). Nasal-trigeminal sensitivity in normal aging and clinical populations [Abstract].Chemical Senses,22, 826.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wysocki, C. J., Dalton, P., Brody, M. J., &Lawley, H. J. (1997). Acetone odor and irritation thresholds obtained from acetone-exposed factory workers and from control (occupationally unexposed) subjects.American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal,58, 704–712.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wysocki, C. J., &Gilbert, A. N. (1989). National Geographic smell survey: Effects of age are heterogenous. In C. L. Murphy, W. S. Cain, & D. M. Hegsted (Eds.),Chemical senses and nutrition in aging(Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 561, pp. 12–28). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wysocki, C. J., Green, B. G., &Malia, T. P. (1992). Monorhinal stimulation as a method for differentiating between thresholds for irritation and odor.Chemical Senses,17, 722–723.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Monell Chemical Senses Center, 3500 Market Street, 19104, Philadelphia, PA

    Charles J. Wysocki & Beverly J. Cowart

  2. Institute of Physiology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic

    Tomas Radil

Authors
  1. Charles J. Wysocki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Beverly J. Cowart
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tomas Radil
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charles J. Wysocki.

Additional information

Financial support was obtained in part from the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (P50 DC00214 and RO1 DC00298), the Fogarty Center (F05 TW04839) at the National Institutes of Health, and the Eugene Garfield Foundation. Barry Green contributed to the development of the lateralization test protocol.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wysocki, C.J., Cowart, B.J. & Radil, T. Nasal trigeminal chemosensitivity across the adult life span. Perception & Psychophysics 65, 115–122 (2003). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194788

Download citation

  • Received: 02 September 1998

  • Accepted: 09 May 2002

  • Issue Date: January 2003

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194788

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Butanol
  • Detection Threshold
  • Dilution Step
  • Chemical Sens
  • Olfactory Sensitivity
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

Advertisement

Search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z

Publish with us

  • Journal finder
  • Publish your research
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our imprints

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support
  • Cancel contracts here

65.109.116.201

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature