Abstract
It is widely assumed that the cerebral hemispheres differ in their capacity for processing the global and local levels of hierarchical stimuli.However, corresponding visual-field (VF) effects in response time studies did not show up under all circumstances. In the present article the role of response conflict between the levels for the occurrence of these effects is investigated.Three experiments with hierarchical letters are reported, in which the absolute and/or the relative interference between the stimulus levels was varied.It turned out that VF effects occurred only for conflicting stimuli and only when there was at least a certain amount of absolute interference, whereas variations of the relative interference had no effect in this respect.These results suggest that there is a qualitative relationship between interference and VF effects.A possible explanation is provided by the assumption that the hemispheres are functionally equivalent with respect to early stimulus representations, whereas they differ in their efficiency for integrating letter identity and stimulus level.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Banich, M.T., &Weissman, D.H. (2000). One of 20 questions for the twenty-first century: How do brain regions interact and integrate information?Brain & Cognition,42, 29–32.
Boer, L.C., &Keuss, P.J.G. (1982). Global precedence as a postperceptual effect: An analysis of speed-accuracy tradeoff functions.Perception & Psychophysics,31, 358–366.
Boles, D.B. (1984). Global versus local processing: Is there a hemispheric dichotomy?Neuropsychologia,22, 445–455.
Boles, D.B., &Karner, T.A. (1996). Hemispheric differences in global versus local processing: Still unclear.Brain & Cognition,30, 232–243.
Carter, C.S., Macdonald, A.M., Botvinick, M., Ross, L.L., Stenger, V.A., Noll, D., &Cohen, J.D. (2000). Parsing executive processes: Strategic vs.evaluative functions of the anterior cingulate cortex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,97, 1944–1948.
Fink, G.R., Halligan, P.W., Marshall, J.C., Frith, C.D., Frackowiak, R.S.J., &Dolan, R.J. (1996). Where in the brain does visual attention select the forest and the trees?Nature,382, 626–628.
Fink, G.R., Halligan, P.W., Marshall, J.C., Frith, C.D., Frackowiak, R.S.J., &Dolan, R.J. (1997). Neural mechanisms involved in the processing of global and local aspects of hierarchically organized visual stimuli.Brain,120, 1779–1791.
Fink, G.R., Marshall, J.C., Halligan, P.W., &Dolan, R.J. (1999). Hemispheric asymmetries in global/local processing are modulated by perceptual salience.Neuropsychologia,37, 31–40.
Fink, G.R., Marshall, J.C., Halligan, P.W., Frith, C.D., &Frackowiak, R. (1997). Hemispheric specialization for global and local processing: The effect of stimulus category.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: Series B,264, 487–494.
Han, S., He, X., Yund, E.W., &Woods, D.L. (2001). Attentional selection in the processing of hierarchical patterns: An ERP study.Biological Psychology,56, 113–130.
Heinze, H.J., Hinrichs, H., Scholz, M., Burchert, W., &Mangun, G.R. (1998). Neural mechanisms of global and local processing: A combined PET and ERP study.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,10, 485–498.
Hommel, B. (2000). The prepared reflex: Automaticity and control in stimulus-response translation. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.),Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 247–273). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hübner, R. (1997). The effect of spatial frequency on global precedence and hemispheric differences.Perception & Psychophysics,59, 187–201.
Hübner, R. (1998). Hemispheric differences in global/local processing revealed by same-different judgements.Visual Cognition,5, 457–478.
Humphreys, G.W., &Boucart, M. (1997). Selection by color and form in vision.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,23, 136–153.
Ivry, R.B., &Robertson, L.C. (1998).The two sides of perception. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kitterle, F.L., Christman, S., &Conesa, J. (1993). Hemispheric differences in the interference among components of compound gratings.Perception & Psychophysics,54, 785–793.
Lamb, M.R., &Robertson, L.C. (1988). The processing of hierarchical stimuli: Effects of retinal locus, locational uncertainty, and stimulus identity.Perception & Psychophysics,44, 172–181.
Lines, C.R., &Milner, A.D. (1983). Nasotemporal overlap in the human retina investigated by means of simple reaction time to lateralized light flash.Experimental Brain Research,50, 166–172.
Livingstone, M., &Hubel, D. (1988). Segregation of form, color, movement, and depth: Anatomy, physiology, and perception.Science,240, 740–749.
Malinowski, P., Hübner, R., Keil, A., &Gruber, T. (2002). The influence of response competition on cerebral asymmetries for processing hierarchical stimuli revealed by ERP recordings.Experimental Brain Research,144, 136–139.
Martinez, A., Moses, P., Frank, L., Buxton, R., Wong, E., &Stiles, J. (1997). Hemispheric asymmetries in global and local processing: Evidence from fMRI.NeuroReport,8, 1685–1689.
Miller, J. (1981). Global precedence in attention and decision.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,7, 1161–1174.
Navon, D. (1977). Forest before the trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception.Cognitive Psychology,9, 353–393.
Robertson, L.C., Egly, R., Lamb, M.R., &Kerth, L. (1993). Spatial attention and cuing to global and local levels of hierarchical structure.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,19, 471–487.
Robertson, L.C., &Lamb, M.R. (1991). Neuropsychological contributions to theories of part/whole organization.Cognitive Psychology,23, 299–330.
Treisman, A. (1988). Features and objects: The fourteenth Bartlett memorial lecture.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology [A],40, 201–237.
Van Kleeck, M.H. (1989). Hemispheric differences in global versus local processing of hierarchical visual stimuli by normal subjects: New data and a meta-analysis of previous studies.Neuropsychologia,27, 1165–1178.
Weissman, D.H., &Banich, M.T. (1999). Global-local interference modulated by communication between the hemispheres.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,128, 283–308.
Zaidel, E., &Rayman, J. (1994). Interhemispheric control in the normal brain: Evidence from redundant bilateral presentations.In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Eds.),Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (pp. 477–504). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Zeki, S., &Shipp, S. (1988). The functional logic of cortical connections.Nature,335, 311–317.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by a grant from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) to R.H.as part of a research group (Ro 805/11-1).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hübner, R., Malinowski, P. The effect of response competition on functional hemispheric asymmetries for global/local processing. Perception & Psychophysics 64, 1290–1300 (2002). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194772
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194772