Abstract
We analyzed detection asymmetry, using open and closed squares as target and context elements. It was found that varying density, regularity, and target eccentricity not only can modulate the amount of asymmetry, but also can produce a reversal in the direction of the asymmetry. The results suggest that the different stimuli are processed with different grains of analysis, consisting of in some cases, single elements and their properties and, in other cases, larger units of the stimulus array and more global properties. A detection task that can utilize the properties that are available with a given grain of analysis would show an advantage over a task for which the given grain of analysis is not as favorable, resulting in detection asymmetry in one direction or another.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Appelle, S. (1972). Perception and discrimination as a function of stimulus orientation: The oblique effect in man and animals.Psychological Bulletin,78, 266–278.
Bacon, W. F., &Egeth, H. E. (1991). Local processes in preattentive feature detection.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,17, 77–90.
Beck, J. (1973). Similarity of curves.Perceptual & Motor Skills,36, 1331–1341.
Beck, J. (1982). Textural segmentation. In J. Beck (Ed.),Organization and representation in perception (pp. 285–317), Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bouma, H. (1970). Interaction effects in parafoveal letter recognition.Nature,226, 177–178.
Carrasco, M., &Frieder, K. S. (1997). Cortical magnification neutralizes the eccentricity effect in visual search.Vision Research,37, 63–82.
Carrasco, M., McLean, T. L., Katz, S. M., &Frieder, K. S. (1998). Feature asymmetries in visual search: Effects of display duration, target eccentricity, orientation and spatial frequency.Vision Research,38, 347–374.
De Valois, R. L., &De Valois, K. K. (1988).Spatial vision. New York: Oxford University Press.
Foster, D. H., &Ward, P. A. (1991). Horizontal-vertical filters in early vision predict anomalous line-orientation identification frequencies.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: Series B,243, 83–86.
Gurnsey, R., &Browse, R. A. (1987). Micropattern properties and presentation conditions influencing visual texture discrimination.Perception & Psychophysics,41, 239–252.
Gurnsey, R., &Browse, R. A. (1989). Asymmetries in visual texture discrimination.Spatial Vision,4, 31–44.
Gurnsey, R., Pearson, P., &Day, D. (1996). Texture segmentation along the horizontal meridian: Nonmonotonic changes in performance with eccentricity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,22, 738–757.
Joffe, K. M., &Scialfa, C. T. (1995). Texture segmentation as a function of eccentricity, spatial frequency and target size.Spatial Vision,9, 325–342.
Julesz, B. (1981). Figure and ground perception in briefly presentedisodipole textures. In M. Kubovy & J. R. Pomerantz (Eds.),Perceptual organization (pp. 27–54). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Julesz, B., &Bergen, J. R. (1983). Textons, the fundamental elements in preattentive vision and perception of textures.Bell System Technical Journal,62, 1619–1645.
Kehrer, L. (1987). Perceptual segregation and retinal position.Spatial Vision,2, 247–261.
Kehrer, L. (1989). Central performance drop on perceptual segregation tasks.Spatial Vision,4, 45–62.
Kimchi, R., &Navon, D. (2000). Relative judgment seems to be the key: Revisiting the Beck effect.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,26, 789–805.
Meinecke, C. (1989). Retinal eccentricity and the detection of targets.Psychological Research,51, 107–116.
Meinecke, C. (1995). How early is early vision? Familiarity effects in texture segmentation and their relation to retinal eccentricity.Perception,24, 131–132.
Meinecke, C. (1997). Texture segmentation and the familiarity effect [Abstract].Perception,26, 111.
Meinecke, C., &Donk, M. (2002). Detection performance in pop-out tasks: Nonmonotonic changes with display size and eccentricity.Perception,31, 531–602.
Meinecke, C., &Kehrer, L. (1994). Peripheral and foveal segmentation of angle textures.Perception & Psychophysics,56, 326–334.
Neyman, J., &Pearson, E. S. (1933). On the problem of the most efficient tests of statistical hypotheses.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Series A,231, 289–337.
Nothdurft, H. C. (1985). Sensitivity for structure gradient in texture discrimination tasks.Vision Research,25, 1957–1968.
Nothdurft, H. C. (1990). Texton segregation by associated differences in global and local luminance distribution.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: Series, B,239, 295–320.
Nothdurft, H. C. (1991). Different effects from spatial frequency masking in texture segregation and texton detection tasks.Vision Research,31, 299–320.
Poirier, F. J. A., &Gurnsey, R. (1998). The effects of eccentricity and spatial frequency on the orientation discrimination asymmetry.Spatial Vision,11, 349–366.
Rubenstein, B. S., &Sagi, D. (1996). Preattentive texture segmentation: The role of line terminations, size, and filter wavelength.Perception & Psychophysics,58, 489–509.
Sagi, D., &Julesz, B. (1987). Short-range limitation on detection of feature differences.Spatial Vision,2, 39–49.
Strasburger, H., Harvey, L. O., Jr., &Rentschler, I. (1991). Contrast thresholds for identification of numeric characters in direct and eccentric view.Perception & Psychophysics,49, 495–508.
Treisman, A. M., &Gormican, S. (1988). Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence from search asymmetries.Psychological Review,95, 15–48.
Treisman, A. M., &Souther, J. (1985). Search asymmetry: A diagnostic for preattentive processing of separable features.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,114, 285–310.
Treisman, M., &Watts, T. R. (1966). Relation between signal detectability theory and the traditional procedures for measuring sensory thresholds: Estimatingd’ from results given by the method of constant stimuli.Psychological Bulletin,66, 438–454.
Wang, Q., Cavanagh, P., &Green, M. (1994). Familiarity and pop-out in visual search.Perception & Psychophysics,56, 495–500.
Williams, D. W. (1992). Cooperative parallel processing in depth, motion and texture perception. In J. Brannan (Ed.),Applications of parallel processing in vision (pp. 167–225). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Wolfe, J. M. (1992). “Effortless” texture segmentation and “parallel” visual search arenot the same thing.Vision Research,32, 757–763.
Yeshurun, Y., &Carrasco, M. (1998). Attention improves or impairs visual performance by enhancing spatial resolution.Nature,396, 72–75.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Meinecke, C., Kimchi, R. & Grandegger, C. A reversal in the direction of detection asymmetry: Effects of spatial density, spatial regularity, and retinal eccentricity. Perception & Psychophysics 64, 829–843 (2002). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194749
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194749