Skip to main content
Download PDF

On the use of metacontrast to assess magnocellular function in dyslexic readers

Perception & Psychophysics volume 63, pages 1271–1274 (2001)Cite this article

Abstract

It has been proposed that dyslexia is the result of a deficit in the magnocellular system. Reduced metacontrast masking in dyslexic readers has been taken as support for this view. In metacontrast, a masking stimulus reduces the visibility of a spatially adjacent target stimulus when the target stimulus precedes the masking stimulus by about 30–100 msec. Recent evidence indicates that the latency difference between the magnocellular and parvocellular subcortical pathways is at most 20 msec and may be as small as only 5 msec, or even less. This makes it difficult to attribute the latency in metacontrast to the latency differences between the magnocellular and parvocellular systems. It is therefore problematic to attribute reduced metacontrast masking to a deficit in the magnocellular system.

References

  • Ahmad, A., &Spear, P. D. (1993). Effect of aging on the size, density, and number of rhesus monkey lateral geniculate neurons.Journal of Comparative Neurology,334, 631–643.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Alpern, M. (1953). Metacontrast.Journal of the Optical Society of America,29, 631–646.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breitmeyer, B. G. (1993). The roles of sustained (P) and transient (M) channels in reading and reading disability. In S. F. Wright & R. Groner (Eds.),Facets of dyslexia and its remediation (pp. 13–31). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breitmeyer, B. G., &Ganz, L. (1976). Implications of sustained and transient channels for theories of visual pattern masking, saccadic suppression, and information processing.Psychological Review,83, 1–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Breitmeyer, B. G., &Williams, M. C. (1990). Effects of isoluminant background color on metacontrast and stroboscopic motion: Interactions between sustained (P) and transient (M) channels.Vision Research,30, 1069–1075.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, V. T., Hogben, J. H., Clark, G. D., &Pratt, C. (1996). Effects of a red background on magnocellular functioning in average and specifically disabled readers.Vision Research,36, 1037–1045.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrera, V. P., Nealey, T. A., &Maunsell, J. H. R. (1994). Responses in macaque visual area V4 following inactivation of the parvocellular and magnocellular LGN pathways.Journal of Neuroscience,14, 2080–2088.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hogben, J. H. (1997). How does a visual transient deficit affect reading? In C. Hulme & M. Snowling (Eds.),Dyslexia: Biology, cognition and intervention (pp. 59–71). London: Whurr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefton, L. A. (1973). Metacontrast: A review.Perception & Psychophysics,13(1B), 161–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, M. S., Rosen, G. D., Drislane, F. W., &Galaburda, A. M. (1991). Physiological and anatomical evidence for a magnocellular defect in developmental dyslexia.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,88, 7943–7947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovegrove, W. (1991). Spatial frequency processing in dyslexic and normal readers. In J. F. Stein (Ed.),Vision and visual dyslexia (pp. 148–154). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovegrove, W. J., Garzia, R. P., &Nicholson, S. B. (1990). Experimental evidence for a transient system deficit in specific reading disability.American Optometric Association Journal,61, 137–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovegrove, W., Martin, F., &Slaghuis, W. (1986). A theoretical and experimental case for a visual deficit in specific reading disability.Cognitive Neuropsychology,3, 225–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malpelli, J. G., Schiller, P. H., &Colby, C. L. (1981). Response properties of single cells in monkey striate cortex during reversible inactivation of individual lateral geniculate laminae.Journal of Neurophysiology,46, 1102–1119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marrocco, R. T. (1976). Sustained and transient cells in monkey lateral geniculate nucleus: Conduction velocities and response properties.Journal of Neurophysiology,39, 340–353.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maunsell, J. H. R. (1987). Physiological evidence for two visual subsystems. In L. M. Vaina (Ed.),Matters of intelligence (pp. 59–87). Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maunsell, J. H. R., Ghose, G. M., Assad, J. A., McAdams, C. J., Boudreau, C. E., &Noerager, B. D. (1999). Visual response latencies of magnocellular and parvocellular neurons in macaque monkeys.Visual Neuroscience,6, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maunsell, J. H. R., &Gibson, J. R. (1992). Visual response latencies in striate cortex of the macaque monkey.Journal of Neurophysiology,68, 1332–1344.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maunsell, J. H. R., Nealey, T. A., &DePriest, D. D. (1990). Magnocellular and parvocellular contributions to responses in the middle temporal visual area (MT) of the macaque monkey.Journal of Neuroscience,10, 3323–3334.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Merigan, W. H., &Maunsell, J. H. R. (1993). How parallel are the primate visual pathways?Annual Review of Neuroscience,16, 369–402.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mitzdorf, U., &Singer, W. (1979). Excitatory synaptic ensemble properties in the visual cortex of the macaque monkey: A current source density analysis of electrically evoked potentials.Journal of Comparative Neurology,187, 71–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Movshon, J. A., &Newsome, W. T. (1996). Visual response properties of striate cortical neurons projecting to area MT in macaque monkeys.Journal of Neuroscience,16, 7733–7741.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nealey, T. A., &Maunsell, J. H. R. (1994). Magnocellular and parvocellular contributions to the responses of macaque striate cortex.Journal of Neuroscience,14, 2069–2079.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nowak, L. G., &Bullier, J. (1997). The timing of information transfer in the visual system. In K. Rockland, J. Kaas, & A. Peters (Eds.),Cerebral cortex (pp. 205–241). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowak, L. G., Munk, M. H. J., Girard, P., &Bullier, J. (1995). Visual latencies in areas V1 and V2 of the macaque monkey.Visual Neuroscience,12, 371–384.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, A., Payne, B. R., &Budd, J. (1994). A numerical analysis of the geniculocortical input to striate cortex in the monkey.Cerebral Cortex,4, 215–229.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Purushothaman, G., Ögmen, H., &Bedell, H. E. (2000). Gammarange oscillations in backward-masking functions and their putative neural correlates.Psychological Review,107, 556–577.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Raiguel, S. E., Lagae, L., Gulyàs, B., &Orban, G. A. (1989). Response latencies of visual cells in macaque areas V1, V2 and V5.Brain Research,493, 155–159.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sawatari, A., &Callaway, E. M. (1996). Convergence of magno- and parvocellular pathways in layer 4B of macaque primary visual cortex.Nature,380, 442–446.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schiller, P. H., &Logothetis, N. K. (1990). The color-opponent and broad-band channels of the primate visual system.Trends in Neurosciences,13, 392–398.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, C. E., Tenke, C. E., Arezzo, J. C., &Vaughan, H. G. (1989). Timing and distribution of flash-evoked activity in the lateral geniculate nucleus of the alert monkey.Brain Research,477, 183–195.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shapley, R. (1990). Visual sensitivity and parallel retinocortical channels.Annual Review of Psychology,41, 635–658.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shapley, R., &Perry, V. H. (1986). Cat and monkey retinal ganglion cells and their visual functional roles.Trends in Neurosciences,9, 229–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skottun, B. C. (2000). The magnocellular deficit theory of dyslexia: The evidence from contrast sensitivity.Vision Research,40, 111–127.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Skottun, B. C., &Parke, L. A. (1999). The possible relationship between visual deficits and dyslexia: Examination of a critical assumption.Journal of Learning Disabilities,32, 2–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, J., &Walsh, V. (1997). To see but not to read: The magnocellular theory of dyslexia.Trends in Neurosciences,20, 147–152.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ungerleider L. G., &Mishkin, M. (1982). Two cortical visual systems. In D. J. Ingle, M. A. Goodale, & R. J. W. Mansfield (Eds.),Analysis of visual behavior (pp. 549–585). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisstein, N., &Haber, R. N. (1965). A U-shaped backward masking function in vision.Psychonomic Science,2, 75–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, H. (1935). Studies on contour: I. Qualitative analysis.American Journal of Psychology,47, 40–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M. C., Molinet, K., &LeCluyse, K. (1989). Visual masking as a measure of temporal processing in normal and disabled readers.Clinical Vision Science,4, 137–144.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Skottun Research, 273 Mather Street, 94611-5154, Piedmont, CA

    Bernt Christian Skottun

Authors
  1. Bernt Christian Skottun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bernt Christian Skottun.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Skottun, B.C. On the use of metacontrast to assess magnocellular function in dyslexic readers. Perception & Psychophysics 63, 1271–1274 (2001). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194540

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194540

Keywords

  • Latency Difference
  • Lateral Geniculate Nucleus
  • Dyslexia
  • Middle Temporal
  • Slow Pathway