Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us Track your research
Search
Cart
  1. Home
  2. Perception & Psychophysics
  3. Article

The cost of expecting events in the wrong sensory modality

  • Published: February 2001
  • Volume 63, pages 330–336, (2001)
  • Cite this article
Download PDF
Perception & Psychophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript
The cost of expecting events in the wrong sensory modality
Download PDF
  • Charles Spence3,
  • Michael E. R. Nicholls1 &
  • Jon Driver2 
  • 2115 Accesses

  • 287 Citations

  • 1 Altmetric

  • Explore all metrics

Abstract

We examined the effects of modality expectancy on human performance. Participants judged azimuth (left vs. right location) for an unpredictable sequence of auditory, visual, and tactile targets. In some blocks, equal numbers of targets were presented in each modality. In others, the majority (75%) of the targets were presented in just one expected modality. Reaction times (RTs) for targets in an unexpected modality were slower than when that modality was expected or when no expectancy applied. RT costs associated with shifting attention from the tactile modality were greater than those for shifts from either audition or vision. Any RT benefits for the most likely modality were due to priming from an event in the same modality on the previous trial, not to the expectancy per se. These results show that stimulus-driven and expectancy-driven effects must be distinguished in studies of attending to different sensory modalities.

Article PDF

Download to read the full article text

Similar content being viewed by others

Probability-driven and stimulus-driven orienting of attention to time and sensory modality

Article 28 June 2019

Melisa Menceloglu, Marcia Grabowecky & Satoru Suzuki

Integrating modality-specific expectancies for the deployment of spatial attention

Article Open access 19 January 2018

Paola Mengotti, Frank Boers, … Simone Vossel

Stimulus expectation alters decision criterion but not sensory signal in perceptual decision making

Article Open access 06 December 2017

Ji Won Bang & Dobromir Rahnev

Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

References

  • Boulter, L. R. (1977). Attention and reaction times to signals of uncertain modality.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,3, 379–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciesielski, K. T., Knight, J. E., Prince, R. J., Harris, R. J., &Handmaker, S.D. (1995). Event-related potentials in cross-modal divided attention in autism.Neuropsychologia,33, 225–246.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dai, H., Scharf, B., &Buus, S. (1991). Effective attenuation of signals in noise under focused attention.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,98, 798–806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driver, J., &Spence, C. J. (1998). Crossmodal attention.Current Opinion in Neurobiology,8, 245–253.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, J. (1980). The demonstration of capacity limitation.Cognitive Psychology,12, 75–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eimer, M., &Driver, J. (2000). An event-related brain potential study of crossmodal links in spatial attention between vision and touch.Psychophysiology,37, 697–705.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, W., &Rock, I. (1960). Perceptual set as an artifact of recency.American Journal of Psychology,73, 214–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferstl, R., Hanewinkel, R., &Krag, P. (1994). Is the modality-shift effect specific for schizophrenia patients?Schizophrenia Bulletin,2, 367–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foxe, J. J., Simpson, G. V., &Ahlfors, S. P. (1998). Parieto-occipital ∼ 10Hz activity reflects anticipatory state of visual attention mechanisms.NeuoReport,9, 3929–3933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gawryszewski, L. De G., Riggio, L., Rizzolatti, G., &Umiltà, C. (1987). Movements of attention in the three spatial dimensions and the meaning of ‘neutral’ cues.Neuropsychologia,25, 19–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gescheider, G. A., Sager, L. C., &Ruffolo, L. J. (1975). Simultaneous auditory and tactile information processing.Perception & Psychophysics,18, 209–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, R. M. (1977). Attention and visual dominance: A chronometric analysis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,3, 365–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kornblum, S. (1967). Choice reaction time for repetitions and nonrepetitions: A reexamination of the information hypothesis.Acta Psychologica,27, 178–187.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • LaBerge, D. (1973). Identification of two components of the time to switch attention: A test of a serial and a parallel model of attention. In S. Kornblum (Ed.),Attention and performance IV (pp. 71–85). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, M. G. F. (1995). Bodily awareness: A sense of ownership. In J. L. Bermudez, A. Marcel, & N. Eilan (Eds.),The body and the self (pp. 267–289). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pashler, H. E. (1998).The psychology of attention. Cambridge: MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, M. I., Nissen, M. J., &Klein, R.M. (1976). Visual dominance: An information-processing account of its origins and significance.Psychological Review,83, 157–171.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Posner, M. I., Nissen, M. J., &Ogden, W.C. (1978). Attended and unattended processing modes: The role of set for spatial location. In H. I. Pick & E. Saltzman (Eds.),Modes of perceiving and processing information (pp. 137–157). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Post, L. J., &Chapman, C. E. (1991). The effects of cross-modal manipulations of attention on the detection of vibrotactile stimuli in humans.Somatosensory & Motor Research,8, 149–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roland, P. E. (1982). Cortical regulation of selective attention in man. A regional cerebral blood flow study.Journal of Neurophysiology,48, 1059–1078.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shiu, L.-P., &Pashler, H. (1994). Negligible effect of spatial precuing on identification of single digits.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 1037–1054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, C. J., &Driver, J. (1996). Audiovisual links in endogenous covert spatial attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,22, 1005–1030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, C. J., &Driver, J. (1997). On measuring selective attention to an expected sensory modality.Perception & Psychophysics,59, 389–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, C. J., Nicholls, M. E. R., Gillespie, N., &Driver, J. (1998). Cross-modal links in exogenous covert spatial orienting between touch, audition, and vision.Perception & Psychophysics,60, 544–557.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, C. J., Pavani, F., &Driver, J. (2000). Crossmodal links between vision and touch in covert endogenous spatial attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,26, 1298–1319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sprengelmeyer, R., Lange, H., &Hömberg, V. (1995). The pattern of attention deficits in Huntington’s disease.Brain,118, 145–152.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, J. F. (1989). Representation of egocentric space in the posterior parietal cortex.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Physiology,74, 583–606.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Steinmetz, P. N., Roy, A., Fitzgerald, P. J., Hsiao, S. S., Johnson, K. O., &Neibur, E. (2000). Attention modulates synchronized neuronal firing in primate somatosensory cortex.Nature & Neuroscience,404, 187–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahn, T. P., Pickar, D., &Haier, R. J. (1994). Effects of clozapine, fluphenazine, and placebo on reaction time measures of attention and sensory dominance in schizophrenia.Schizophrenia Research,13, 133–144.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zubin, J. (1975). Problems of attention in schizophrenia. In M. L. Kietzman, S. Sutton, & J. Zubin (Eds.),Experimental approaches to psychopathology (pp. 139–166). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia

    Michael E. R. Nicholls

  2. University College London, London, England

    Jon Driver

  3. Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, OX1 3UD, Oxford, England

    Charles Spence

Authors
  1. Charles Spence
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michael E. R. Nicholls
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jon Driver
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charles Spence.

Additional information

This work was supported by a Programme grant from the Medical Research Council (U.K.) and by a grant from the Australian Research Council. Our thanks to Nicole Gillespie for running the participants in the experiment.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Spence, C., Nicholls, M.E.R. & Driver, J. The cost of expecting events in the wrong sensory modality. Perception & Psychophysics 63, 330–336 (2001). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194473

Download citation

  • Received: 29 March 2000

  • Accepted: 23 June 2000

  • Issue Date: February 2001

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194473

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Visual Target
  • Reaction Time Data
  • Block Type
  • Target Modality
  • Auditory Target
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

Advertisement

Search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z

Publish with us

  • Publish your research
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our imprints

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support

5.135.140.155

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2024 Springer Nature