Abstract
Two experiments are reported in which the possibility that auditory attention may be controlled in a stimulus-driven manner by duration, intensity, and timbre cues was examined. In both experiments, listeners were presented with a cue followed, after a variable time period of a 150-, 450-, or 750-msec stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA), by a target. In three different conditions for each experiment, the duration, intensity, or timbre relation between the cue and the target was varied so that, on 50% of the trials, the two sounds were identical and, on 50% of the trials, the two sounds were different in the manipulated feature. The two experiments differed only in the judgment required, with listeners in Experiment 1 identifying the duration, intensity, or timbre of the target and listeners in Experiment 2 indicating whether the target incorporated a brief silent gap. In both experiments, performance was observed to depend on both the similarity of and the time between the cue and the target. Specifically, whereas at the 150-msec SOA performance was best when the target was identical to the preceding cue, at the 750-msec SOA performance was best when the cue and the target differed. This pattern establishes the existence of duration-, intensity-, and timbre-based auditory inhibition of return. The theoretical implications of these results are considered.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ashby, F. G., &Perrin, N. A. (1988). Toward a theory of similarity and recognition.Psychological Review,95, 124–150.
Baer, T., Moore, B. C. J., &Glasberg, B. R. (1999). Detection and intensity discrimination of Gaussian-shaped tone pulses as a function of duration.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,106, 1907–1916.
Bregman, A. S. (1990).Auditory scene analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bregman, A. S., Achim, A., &Ahad, P. D. (1992).The MAPLE software system. Montreal: McGill University, Department of Psychology.
Bregman, A. S., &Pinker, S. (1978). Auditory streaming and the building of timbre.Canadian Journal of Psychology,32, 19–31.
Broadbent, D. E. (1957). A mechanical model for human attention and immediate memory.Psychological Review,64, 205–215.
Broadbent, D. E. (1958).Perception and communication. London: Pergamon.
Carterette, E. C., Friedman, M. P., &Wyman, M. J. (1966). Feedback and psychophysical variables in signal detection.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,39, 1051–1055.
Cherry, E. C. (1953). Some experiments on the recognition of speech, with one and with two ears.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,25, 975–979.
Creelman, C. D. (1959). Detection of signals of uncertain frequency.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,32, 805–810.
Dai, H., Scharf, B., &Buus, S. (1991). Effective attenuation of signals in noise under focused attention.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,89, 2837–2842.
Danzinger, S., &Kingstone, A. (1999). Unmasking the inhibition of return phenomenon.Perception & Psychophysics,61, 1024–1037.
Green, D. M., McKey, M. J., &Licklider, J. C. R. (1959). Detection of a pulsed sinusoid in noise as a function of frequency.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,31, 1446–1452.
Greenberg, G. Z., &Larkin, W. D. (1968). Frequency-response characteristic of auditory observers detecting signals of a single frequency in noise: The probe-signal method.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,44, 1513–1523.
Hafter, E. R., &Carrier, S. C. (1972). Binaural interaction in lowfrequency stimuli: The inability to trade time and intensity completely.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,51, 1852–1862.
Handel, S. (1989).Listening: An introduction to the perception of auditory events. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Helmholtz, H. von (1954).On the sensation of tone as a physiological basis for the theory of music (2nd English ed.; A. J. Ellis, Trans.). New York: Dover. (Original work published 1885)
Henke, W. L. (1990).An interactive dialogue language for time signal processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT, Research Laboratory of Electronics.
Hirsh, I. J. &Watson, C. S. (1996). Auditory psychophysics and perception.Annual Review of Psychology,47, 461–484.
Huggins, W. H. (1952). A phase principle for complex frequency analysis and its implications in auditory theory.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,24, 582–589.
Hunt, R. R. (1995). The subtlety of distinctiveness: What von Restorff really did.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,2, 105–112.
Iverson, P. (1995). Auditory stream segregation by musical timbre: Effects of static and dynamic acoustic attributes.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,21, 751–763.
Iverson, P., &Krumhansl, C. L. (1993). Isolating the dynamic attributes of musical timbre.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,94, 2595–2603.
Jeffress, L. A. (1967). Stimulus-oriented approach to detection reexamined.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,41, 480–488.
Johnson, D. M., &Hafter, E. R. (1980). Uncertain-frequency detection: Cuing and condition of observation.Perception & Psychophysics,28, 143–149.
Johnston, W. A., &Heinz, S. P. (1978). Flexibility and capacity demands of attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,107, 420–435.
Kinchla, R. A. (1992). Attention.Annual Review of Psychology,43, 711–742.
Klein, R. M., &MacInnes, W. J. (1999). Inhibition of return is a foraging facilitator in visual search.Psychological Science,10, 346–352.
Klein, R. M., &Taylor, T. L. (1994). Categories of cognitive inhibition with reference to attention. In D. Dagenbach & T. H. Carr (Eds.),Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 113–150). San Diego: Academic Press.
Law, M. B., Pratt, J., &Abrams, R. A. (1995). Color-based inhibition of return.Perception & Psychophysics,57, 401–408.
Luce, R. D. (1963). Detection and recognition. In R. D. Luce, R. R. Bush, & E. Galanter (Eds.),Handbook of mathematical psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 103–190). New York: Wiley.
Macmillan, N. A., &Schwartz, M. (1975). A probe-signal investigation of uncertain-frequency detection.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,58, 1051–1058.
Maylor, A. M., &Hockey, R. (1985). Inhibitory component of externally controlled covert orienting in space.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,11, 777–787.
Mondor, T. A. (1999). Predictability of the cue-target relation and the time-course of auditory inhibition of return.Perception & Psychophysics,61, 1501–1509.
Mondor, T. A., &Amirault, K. J. (1998). Effect of same- and differentmodality spatial cues on auditory and visual target identification.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 745–755.
Mondor, T. A., &Breau, L. M. (1999). Facilitative and inhibitory effects of location and frequency cues: Evidence of a modulation in perceptual sensitivity.Perception & Psychophysics,61, 438–444.
Mondor, T. A., Breau, L. M., &Milliken, B. (1998). Inhibitory processes in auditory selective attention: Evidence of location-based and frequency-based inhibition of return.Perception & Psychophysics,60, 296–302.
Mondor, T. A., &Bregman, A. S. (1994). Allocating attention to frequency regions.Perception & Psychophysics,56, 268–276.
Mondor, T. A., Terrio, N. A., &Hurlburt, J. (2000). On the role of eye movements and voluntary saccade preparation in generating location-based auditory inhibition of return.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology,54, 326–338.
Moore, B. C. J. (1989).An introduction to the psychology of hearing. San Diego: Academic Press.
Moray, N. (1972).Listening and attention. Baltimore: Penguin Books.
Moray, N. (1974). A data base for theories of selective listening. In P. M. A. Rabbitt & S. Dornic (Eds.),Attention and performance V (pp. 119–135). New York: Academic Press.
Moray, N., Fitter, M., Ostry, D., Favreau, D., &Nagy, V. (1976). Attention to pure tones.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,28, 271–283.
Ortmann, O. (1935). What is tone-quality?Musical Quarterly,21, 442–450.
Penner, M. J. (1972). The effect of payoffs and cue tones on detection of sinusoids of uncertain frequency.Perception & Psychophysics,11, 198–202.
Posner, M. I., &Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orientating. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.),Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (pp. 531–555). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Rafal, R. D., Calabressi, P. A., Brennan, C. W., &Sciolto, T. K. (1989). Saccade preparation inhibits reorienting to recently attended locations.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,15, 673–685.
Reuter-Lorenz, P. A., Jha, A. P., &Rosenquist, J. N. (1996). What is inhibited in inhibition of return?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,22, 367–378.
Reuter-Lorenz, P. A., &Rosenquist, J. N. (1996). Auditory cues and inhibition of return: The importance of oculomotor activation.Experimental Brain Research,112, 119–126.
Sapir, A., Soroker, N., Berger, A., &Henik, A. (1999). Inhibition of return in spatial attention: Direct evidence for collicular generation.Nature Neuroscience,2, 1053–1054.
Scharf, B., Quigley, S., Aoki, C., Peachey, N., &Reeves, A. (1987). Focused auditory attention and frequency sensitivity.Perception & Psychophysics,42, 215–223.
Schlauch, R. S., &Hafter, E. R. (1991). Listening bandwidths and frequency uncertainty in pure-tone signal detection.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,90, 1332–1339.
Schmidt, W. C. (1996). Inhibition of return without visual input.Neuropsychologia,34, 943–952.
Shaw, M. L. (1978). A capacity allocation model for reaction time.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,4, 586–598.
Shaw, M. L. (1984). Division of attention among spatial locations: A fundamental difference between detection of letters and detection of luminance increments. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.),Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (pp. 109–121). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Sorkin, R. D., Pastore, R. E., &Gilliom, J. D. (1968). Signal probability and the listening band.Perception & Psychophysics,4, 10–12.
Spence, C., &Driver, J. (1997). Audiovisual links in exogenous covert spatial orienting.Perception & Psychophysics,59, 1–22.
Spence, C., &Driver, J. (1998). Auditory and audiovisual inhibition of return.Perception & Psychophysics,60, 125–139.
Swets, J. A. (1963). Central factors in auditory frequency selectivity.Psychological Bulletin,60, 429–440.
Taylor, T. L., &Klein, R. M. (1998a). Inhibition of return to color: A replication and nonextension of Law, Pratt, and Abrams (1995).Perception & Psychophysics,60, 1452–1456.
Taylor, T. L., &Klein, R. M. (1998b). On the causes and effects of inhibition of return.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,5, 625–643.
Tekman, H. G. (1997). Interactions of perceived intensity, duration, and pitch in pure tone sequences.Music Perception,14, 281–294.
Tipper, S. P., Weaver, B., Jerreat, L. M., &Burak, A. L. (1994). Object-based and environment-based inhibition of return of visual attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 478–499.
Treisman, A. M. (1960). Contextual cues in selective listening.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,12, 242–248.
Treisman, A. M. (1969). Strategies and models of selective attention.Psychological Review,76, 282–299.
Treisman, A. M. (1972). Detection of binaural tone stimuli: Time sharing or criterion change?Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,51, 625–631.
Turnbull, W. W. (1944). Pitch discrimination as a function of tonal duration.Journal of Experimental Psychology,34, 302–316.
Ward, L. M. (1994). Supramodal and modality-specific mechanisms for stimulus-driven shifts of auditory and visual attention.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology,48, 242–259.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by a grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada to T.A.M.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mondor, T.A., Lacey, T.E. Facilitative and inhibitory effects of cuing sound duration, intensity, and timbre. Perception & Psychophysics 63, 726–736 (2001). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194433
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194433